World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
7520
World Ranking
7540
National Ranking
4062

Colin Martindale publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colin Martindale sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Colin Martindale D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colin Martindale sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Colin Martindale was affiliated with the University of Maine in the United States during their academic career. They contributed to research primarily documented in the Journal of Literary Theory, which featured prominently as a publication venue for their work.

Martindale's recent papers included the following:

  • "Titelseiten," published in 2022 in the Journal of Literary Theory
  • "Titelseiten," published in 2020 in the Journal of Literary Theory

Frequent collaborators in their research network included Jan Borkowski, Els Andringa, Karin Bauer, Vladimir Biti, and Vienna Csúri. Each of these co-authors collaborated with Martindale on multiple occasions, indicating ongoing scholarly partnerships.

Their publication record was closely associated with the Journal of Literary Theory, reflecting a consistent focus in that domain. This connection suggests engagement with topics related to literary analysis and theory, although specific subfields or main study topics were not specified in the available data.

Martindale's body of work did not include book publications registered with major publishers in the provided data, nor were there recorded awards or recognitions listed. The research emphasis appeared concentrated on journal contributions.

Best Publications

  • Biological bases of creativity.

    Colin Martindale

  • Personality, situation, and creativity.

    Colin Martindale

  • Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne's psychobiological theory.

    Colin Martindale;Kathleen Moore;Jonathan Borkum

  • The Clockwork Muse: The Predictability of Artistic Change.

    Remi Clignet;Colin Martindale

  • Priming, prototypicality, and preference.

    Colin Martindale;Kathleen Moore

  • Cognition and consciousness

    Colin Martindale

  • Creativity and connectionism.

    Colin Martindale

  • Creativity, primary process cognition and personality

    Colin Martindale;Audrey Dailey

  • EEG differences as a function of creativity, stage of the creative process, and effort to be original.

    Colin Martindale;Nancy Hasenfus

  • Creativity and cortical activation during creative, intellectual and eeg feedback tasks

    Colin Martindale;Dwight Mines

  • Romantic Progression: The Psychology of Literary History

    Colin Martindale

  • Cognitive Psychology: A Neural-network Approach

    Colin Martindale

  • Relationship of Preference Judgments to Typicality, Novelty, and Mere Exposure:

    Colin Martindale;Kathleen Moore;Alan West

  • EEG alpha asymmetry and creativity

    Colin Martindale;Dwight Hines;Linda Mitchell;Edward Covello

  • The pleasures of thought: A theory of cognitive hedonics.

    Colin Martindale

  • The Differential Effect of Increased Arousal on Creative and Intellectual Performance

    Colin Martindale;James Greenough

  • Creative potential, attention, and speed of information processing

    Oshin Vartanian;Colin Martindale;Jonna Kwiatkowski

  • Creativity and speed of information processing: A double dissociation involving elementary versus inhibitory cognitive tasks

    Leonid Dorfman;Colin Martindale;Vera Gassimova;Oshin Vartanian

  • On the Utility of Content Analysis in Author Attribution: The Federalist

    Colin Martindale;Dean McKenzie

  • Creativity, Synesthesia, and Physiognomic Perception

    Audrey Dailey;Colin Martindale;Jonathan Borkum

  • Genius. The natural history of creativity: Hans Eysenck: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1995). Hardback. pp. 1–344. ISBN 0 521 48014 0. Price £37.50 (US $69.95). Paperback ISBN 0 521 48508 8. Price £17.95 (US $27.95)

    Colin Martindale

  • Romantic Progression: The Psychology of Literary History by Colin Martindale

    Ellen Winner;Colin Martindale

Frequent Co-Authors

Dean Philip McKenzie
Dean Philip McKenzie Monash University
Andrew Mackinnon
Andrew Mackinnon University of New South Wales
Ivan W. Miller
Ivan W. Miller Brown University
Ellen Winner
Ellen Winner Boston College
Stephen E. Fienberg
Stephen E. Fienberg Carnegie Mellon University
Lee Sigelman
Lee Sigelman George Washington University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology degree is a major step toward a rewarding career in mental health, education, or research. There are many options available across the United States, including renowned online offerings. When considering your studies, it’s important to compare programs based on accreditation, faculty expertise, cost, and specialization tracks.

Nationally, there are comprehensive resources like the best psychology degree programs ranking in America to help you evaluate top institutions and online pathways. If you're interested in a specific region, you can also explore resources such as the best psychology degree programs ranking in South Dakota, or focus on the best psychology degree programs ranking in Virginia.

Localized guides like the best psychology degree programs ranking in Shreveport are especially helpful for students seeking flexible learning or planning future employment in specific areas.

Graduates with psychology degrees can pursue roles as counselors, therapists, HR specialists, researchers, or case managers. Online degrees can offer the flexibility needed for working adults or those balancing other commitments. No matter your goals, researching your options can help ensure a strong start in the diverse field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Colin Martindale

Recently Published Articles