World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
28456
World Ranking
12245
National Ranking
1153

Colin J Morley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colin J Morley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 426 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Colin J Morley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colin J Morley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Colin J Morley is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. The main field of study is Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. The research work spans multiple interconnected subfields within medical science.

The scientist's primary topics of research cover various aspects of neonatal and respiratory health, including:

  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Ear Surgery and Otitis Media

Colin J Morley has contributed numerous publications, with frequent appearances in well-established venues such as:

  • Resuscitation
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal
  • Notfall + Rettungsmedizin
  • Acta Paediatrica

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Colin J Morley are:

  • European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Newborn resuscitation and support of transition of infants at birth (2021, Resuscitation)
  • Sustained versus standard inflations during neonatal resuscitation to prevent mortality and improve respiratory outcomes (2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)
  • A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of respiratory function monitoring during stabilisation of very preterm infants at birth (2021, Resuscitation)
  • Versorgung und Reanimation des Neugeborenen nach der Geburt (2021, Notfall + Rettungsmedizin)
  • Resuscitators' opinions on using a respiratory function monitor during neonatal resuscitation (2022, Acta Paediatrica)

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Arjan B. te Pas
  • Peter G. Davis
  • John Madar
  • Charles Christoph Roehr
  • Sean Ainsworth

Best Publications

  • Nasal CPAP or Intubation at Birth for Very Preterm Infants

    Colin J. Morley;Colin J. Morley;Colin J. Morley;Peter G. Davis;Peter G. Davis;Lex W. Doyle;Lex W. Doyle;Luc P. Brion

  • Part 11: Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

    Jeffrey M. Perlman;Jonathan Wyllie;John Kattwinkel;Dianne L. Atkins

  • Whole-Body Hypothermia for Term and Near-Term Newborns With Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Susan E. Jacobs;Colin J. Morley;Terrie E. Inder;Michael J. Stewart

  • Prophylactic versus selective use of surfactant in preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants

    Maria Ximena Rojas-Reyes;Colin J Morley;Roger Soll

  • Defining the reference range for oxygen saturation for infants after birth.

    Jennifer A Dawson;Jennifer A Dawson;C Omar F Kamlin;C Omar F Kamlin;Maximo Vento;Connie Wong

  • Neonatal Resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

    Jeffrey M Perlman;Jonathan Wyllie;John Kattwinkel;Dianne L Atkins

  • Delaying cord clamping until ventilation onset improves cardiovascular function at birth in preterm lambs.

    Sasmira Bhatt;Sasmira Bhatt;Beth J. Alison;Euan M. Wallace;Euan M. Wallace;Kelly J. Crossley;Kelly J. Crossley

  • Oxygen Saturation and Outcomes in Preterm Infants

    Ben J. Stenson;William O. Tarnow-Mordi;Brian A. Darlow;John Simes

  • European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Executive summary.

    Gavin D. Perkins;Jan-Thorsen Gräsner;Federico Semeraro;Theresa Olasveengen

  • Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates

    Antonio G De Paoli;Peter G Davis;Brenda Faber;Colin J Morley

  • Endotracheal Intubation Attempts During Neonatal Resuscitation: Success Rates, Duration, and Adverse Effects

    Colm P.F. O'Donnell;Colm P.F. O'Donnell;C. Omar F. Kamlin;Peter G. Davis;Peter G. Davis;Colin J. Morley

  • European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Newborn resuscitation and support of transition of infants at birth.

    John Madar;Charles C. Roehr;Sean Ainsworth;Hege Ersdal

  • Low-Dose Dexamethasone Facilitates Extubation Among Chronically Ventilator-Dependent Infants: A Multicenter, International, Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Lex W. Doyle;Peter G. Davis;Colin J. Morley;Andy McPhee

  • Association Between Oxygen Saturation Targeting and Death or Disability in Extremely Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration.

    Lisa M Askie;Brian A Darlow;Neil Finer;Barbara Schmidt;Barbara Schmidt

  • Probiotic Effects on Late-onset Sepsis in Very Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Susan E. Jacobs;Jacinta M. Tobin;Gillian F. Opie;Susan Donath

  • Clinical assessment of infant colour at delivery

    Colm Patrick Finbarr O'Donnell;C. Omar Farouk Kamlin;Peter Graham Davis;John B Carlin

  • The physical properties of an effective lung surfactant

    A.D. Bangham;C.J. Morley;M.C. Phillips

  • Oxygen saturation in healthy infants immediately after birth.

    C. Omar F. Kamlin;C. Omar F. Kamlin;Colm P.F. O’Donnell;Colm P.F. O’Donnell;Peter G. Davis;Peter G. Davis;Colin J. Morley;Colin J. Morley

  • Volume‐targeted versus pressure‐limited ventilation in neonates

    Claus Klingenberg;Kevin I Wheeler;Naomi McCallion;Colin J Morley

  • The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: Neonatal resuscitation

    Jeffrey M. Perlman;John Kattwinkel;Sam Richmond;David Boyle

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter G Davis
Peter G Davis University of Melbourne
Stuart B. Hooper
Stuart B. Hooper Hudson Institute of Medical Research
Lex W. Doyle
Lex W. Doyle University of Melbourne
Susan Donath
Susan Donath University of Melbourne
Anne Greenough
Anne Greenough King's College London
Tim J. Cole
Tim J. Cole University College London
John B. Carlin
John B. Carlin University of Melbourne
Suzanne M. Garland
Suzanne M. Garland University of Melbourne
Richard Harding
Richard Harding King's College London
Ola Didrik Saugstad
Ola Didrik Saugstad Oslo University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to many allied health and administrative roles. If direct patient care or clinical work isn’t your sole focus, an online healthcare administration degree can provide leadership training for roles in hospitals, clinics, and insurance organizations.

Nurses seeking advanced practice opportunities can explore rn to np programs, which allow RNs to become nurse practitioners through flexible bridge programs. This is a fast-growing pathway for those committed to clinical practice.

The demand for nutrition experts is also rising across healthcare and wellness industries. Earning the best online food science degree can launch careers in research, food service management, public health, and more.

For those aiming for executive healthcare roles, completing a cahme (Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Management Education) accredited master's program ensures rigorous, industry-recognized training for top-level positions.

Each of these career pathways complements a medical education, offering flexible online options for professional advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Colin J Morley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles