World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Earth Science
Italy
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 87 345 296 14 12 444 24428

Claudio Faccenna publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Claudio Faccenna between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Claudio Faccenna published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 15.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2010. 48 of the 531 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2010. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 33 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 21 publications
1991 2025

531 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Claudio Faccenna: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 5
1995 4
1996 4
1997 4
1998 4
1999 9
2000 10
2001 10
2002 8
2003 12
2004 14
2005 9
2006 9
2007 9
2008 23
2009 20
2010 33
2011 14
2012 32
2013 29
2014 18
2015 11
2016 27
2017 19
2018 25
2019 23
2020 24
2021 23
2022 27
2023 23
2024 27
2025 21
Total 531
Download as CSV

Claudio Faccenna publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio Faccenna sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 438–447 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 444 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36 444
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Claudio Faccenna D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio Faccenna sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26 87
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Earth Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Earth Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Earth Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2017 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)
  • 2008 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Subduction
  • Plate tectonics
  • Tectonics

His primary scientific interests are in Subduction, Seismology, Slab, Mantle and Mantle convection. His studies in Subduction integrate themes in fields like Lithosphere, Plate tectonics and Crust. His work in Seismology is not limited to one particular discipline; it also encompasses Paleontology.

His Slab study combines topics in areas such as Metamorphic rock, Geometry, Viscosity, Mechanics and North Anatolian Fault. His study in Mantle is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Denudation, Volcanism, Ocean surface topography and Mantle flow. His research integrates issues of Mediterranean climate, Mantle wedge and Transition zone in his study of Mantle convection.

His most cited work include:

  • Mediterranean extension and the Africa‐Eurasia collision (714 citations)
  • Lateral slab deformation and the origin of the western Mediterranean arcs (687 citations)
  • History of subduction and back‐arc extension in the Central Mediterranean (465 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Claudio Faccenna mostly deals with Subduction, Seismology, Mantle, Slab and Tectonics. His Subduction research includes themes of Petrology, Lithosphere, Geophysics and Plate tectonics. His Neogene research extends to Seismology, which is thematically connected.

Claudio Faccenna interconnects Ocean surface topography, Mantle convection and Mantle flow in the investigation of issues within Mantle. His research in Slab intersects with topics in Seismic tomography, Eclogitization, Volcanism and Slab suction. In his study, Blueschist is inextricably linked to Metamorphic rock, which falls within the broad field of Tectonics.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Subduction (43.91%)
  • Seismology (33.65%)
  • Mantle (26.73%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Subduction (43.91%)
  • Paleontology (23.39%)
  • Mantle (26.73%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Claudio Faccenna focuses on Subduction, Paleontology, Mantle, Tectonics and Slab. His Subduction study is associated with Seismology. Claudio Faccenna combines subjects such as Drainage system and Atlas with his study of Paleontology.

The various areas that Claudio Faccenna examines in his Mantle study include Ocean surface topography, Lithosphere, Mantle convection and Plate tectonics. The study incorporates disciplines such as Granular material, Mediterranean climate and Mineralogy in addition to Tectonics. His Slab research incorporates elements of Volcanism, Mantle wedge and Transition zone.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Initiation of the Andean orogeny by lower mantle subduction (46 citations)
  • Mantle Flow and Deforming Continents: From India-Asia Convergence to Pacific Subduction. (34 citations)
  • Dynamics of the Ryukyu/Izu-Bonin-Marianas double subduction system (29 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Subduction
  • Plate tectonics
  • Tectonics

Claudio Faccenna spends much of his time researching Paleontology, Mantle, Subduction, Tectonics and Lithosphere. Claudio Faccenna focuses mostly in the field of Paleontology, narrowing it down to topics relating to Atlas and, in certain cases, Strain partitioning and Transpression. The concepts of his Mantle study are interwoven with issues in Paleomagnetism, Mantle convection, Sedimentary rock, Paleogene and Neogene.

His Subduction study introduces a deeper knowledge of Seismology. Many of his research projects under Tectonics are closely connected to Outlier with Outlier, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. His Lithosphere research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Petrology, Passive margin, Geophysics and Rift zone.

Best Publications

  • Mediterranean extension and the Africa‐Eurasia collision

    Laurent Jolivet;Claudio Faccenna

  • Lateral slab deformation and the origin of the western Mediterranean arcs

    Claudio Faccenna;Claudia Piromallo;Ana Crespo-Blanc;Laurent Jolivet

  • History of subduction and back‐arc extension in the Central Mediterranean

    Claudio Faccenna;Thorsten W. Becker;Francesco Pio Lucente;Laurent Jolivet

  • Aegean tectonics: Strain localisation, slab tearing and trench retreat

    Laurent Jolivet;Claudio Faccenna;Benjamin Huet;Loïc Labrousse

  • Midcrustal shear zones in postorogenic extension: Example from the northern Tyrrhenian Sea

    Laurent Jolivet;Claudio Faccenna;Bruno Goffé;Massimo Mattei

  • Mantle dynamics in the Mediterranean

    Claudio Faccenna;Thorsten W Becker;Ludwig Auer;Andrea Billi

  • Subduction tectonics and exhumation of high pressure metamorphic rocks in the Mediterranean orogens

    Laurent Jolivet;Claudio Faccenna;Bruno Goffé;Evgenii Burov

  • Slab detachment beneath eastern Anatolia: A possible cause for the formation of the North Anatolian fault

    Claudio Faccenna;Olivier Bellier;Joseph Martinod;Claudia Piromallo

  • Exhumation of high-pressure rocks driven by slab rollback

    Jean-Pierre Brun;Claudio Faccenna

  • A benchmark comparison of spontaneous subduction models – towards a free surface

    H. Schmeling;Andrey Babeyko;A. Enns;C. Faccenna

  • Vertical GPS ground motion rates in the Euro-Mediterranean region: New evidence of velocity gradients at different spatial scales along the Nubia-Eurasia plate boundary

    Enrico Serpelloni;Claudio Faccenna;Giorgio Spada;Danan Dong

  • Episodic Back-arc extension during restricted mantle convection in the Central Mediterranean

    Claudio Faccenna;Francesca Funiciello;Francesca Funiciello;Domenico Giardini;Pio Lucente

  • The dynamics of back‐arc extension: an experimental approach to the opening of the Tyrrhenian Sea

    Claudio Faccenna;Philippe Davy;Jean-Pierre Brun;Renato Funiciello

  • Subduction and the depth of convection in the Mediterranean mantle

    Claudio Faccenna;Laurent Jolivet;Claudia Piromallo;Andrea Morelli

  • Dynamics of retreating slabs : 2. Insights from three-dimensional laboratory experiments

    Francesca Funiciello;Claudio Faccenna;Domenico Giardini;Klaus Regenauer-Lieb

  • Flat subduction dynamics and deformation of the South American plate: Insights from analog modeling

    Nicolas Espurt;Nicolas Espurt;Francesca Funiciello;Joseph Martinod;Benjamin Guillaume

  • Subduction-triggered magmatic pulses: A new class of plumes?

    Claudio Faccenna;Thorsten W. Becker;Serge Lallemand;Yves Lagabrielle

  • From mantle to crust: Stretching the Mediterranean

    Laurent Jolivet;Claudio Faccenna;Claudia Piromallo

  • Mapping mantle flow during retreating subduction: Laboratory models analyzed by feature tracking

    Francesca Funiciello;M Moroni;C Piromallo;C Faccenna

  • Shaping mobile belts by small-scale convection

    Claudio Faccenna;Thorsten W. Becker

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesca Funiciello
Francesca Funiciello Roma Tre University
Thorsten W. Becker
Thorsten W. Becker The University of Texas at Austin
Federico Rossetti
Federico Rossetti Roma Tre University
Renato Funiciello
Renato Funiciello Roma Tre University
Laurent Jolivet
Laurent Jolivet Sorbonne University
Andrea Billi
Andrea Billi National Research Council (CNR)
Laurent Husson
Laurent Husson Grenoble Alpes University
Claudia Piromallo
Claudia Piromallo National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology
Massimo Mattei
Massimo Mattei Roma Tre University
Giorgio Ranalli
Giorgio Ranalli Carleton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science through online degrees opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. Many students enhance their skill sets by combining Earth Science with complementary fields such as language, art, and multimedia. For those interested in expanding communication skills alongside scientific knowledge, pursuing an online Spanish degree programs for veterans offers a practical route, blending cultural insights with global environmental issues.

Additionally, creative professionals looking to engage with environmental themes opt for degrees like a master of fine arts online, which can enrich storytelling and visual representation skills relevant to public outreach and education. Veterans particularly benefit from tailored programs such as veteran friendly online photography degree programs, where skills in imagery and spatial awareness complement Earth Science applications like geographic information systems (GIS) and field documentation.

For those prioritizing affordability and timely graduation, options highlighted in online Spanish degree programs provide a cost-effective, valued credential that pairs well with environmental studies focused on bilingual communication and policy. Combining these diverse skill sets can significantly enhance career prospects in fields such as environmental consulting, education, conservation, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Claudio Faccenna

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles