World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Earth Science
Italy
2025

Claudio Faccenna publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio Faccenna sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Claudio Faccenna D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudio Faccenna sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Earth Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Earth Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Earth Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2017 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)
  • 2008 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Subduction
  • Plate tectonics
  • Tectonics

His primary scientific interests are in Subduction, Seismology, Slab, Mantle and Mantle convection. His studies in Subduction integrate themes in fields like Lithosphere, Plate tectonics and Crust. His work in Seismology is not limited to one particular discipline; it also encompasses Paleontology.

His Slab study combines topics in areas such as Metamorphic rock, Geometry, Viscosity, Mechanics and North Anatolian Fault. His study in Mantle is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Denudation, Volcanism, Ocean surface topography and Mantle flow. His research integrates issues of Mediterranean climate, Mantle wedge and Transition zone in his study of Mantle convection.

His most cited work include:

  • Mediterranean extension and the Africa‐Eurasia collision (714 citations)
  • Lateral slab deformation and the origin of the western Mediterranean arcs (687 citations)
  • History of subduction and back‐arc extension in the Central Mediterranean (465 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Claudio Faccenna mostly deals with Subduction, Seismology, Mantle, Slab and Tectonics. His Subduction research includes themes of Petrology, Lithosphere, Geophysics and Plate tectonics. His Neogene research extends to Seismology, which is thematically connected.

Claudio Faccenna interconnects Ocean surface topography, Mantle convection and Mantle flow in the investigation of issues within Mantle. His research in Slab intersects with topics in Seismic tomography, Eclogitization, Volcanism and Slab suction. In his study, Blueschist is inextricably linked to Metamorphic rock, which falls within the broad field of Tectonics.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Subduction (43.91%)
  • Seismology (33.65%)
  • Mantle (26.73%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Subduction (43.91%)
  • Paleontology (23.39%)
  • Mantle (26.73%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Claudio Faccenna focuses on Subduction, Paleontology, Mantle, Tectonics and Slab. His Subduction study is associated with Seismology. Claudio Faccenna combines subjects such as Drainage system and Atlas with his study of Paleontology.

The various areas that Claudio Faccenna examines in his Mantle study include Ocean surface topography, Lithosphere, Mantle convection and Plate tectonics. The study incorporates disciplines such as Granular material, Mediterranean climate and Mineralogy in addition to Tectonics. His Slab research incorporates elements of Volcanism, Mantle wedge and Transition zone.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Initiation of the Andean orogeny by lower mantle subduction (46 citations)
  • Mantle Flow and Deforming Continents: From India-Asia Convergence to Pacific Subduction. (34 citations)
  • Dynamics of the Ryukyu/Izu-Bonin-Marianas double subduction system (29 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Subduction
  • Plate tectonics
  • Tectonics

Claudio Faccenna spends much of his time researching Paleontology, Mantle, Subduction, Tectonics and Lithosphere. Claudio Faccenna focuses mostly in the field of Paleontology, narrowing it down to topics relating to Atlas and, in certain cases, Strain partitioning and Transpression. The concepts of his Mantle study are interwoven with issues in Paleomagnetism, Mantle convection, Sedimentary rock, Paleogene and Neogene.

His Subduction study introduces a deeper knowledge of Seismology. Many of his research projects under Tectonics are closely connected to Outlier with Outlier, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. His Lithosphere research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Petrology, Passive margin, Geophysics and Rift zone.

Best Publications

  • Mediterranean extension and the Africa‐Eurasia collision

    Laurent Jolivet;Claudio Faccenna

  • Lateral slab deformation and the origin of the western Mediterranean arcs

    Claudio Faccenna;Claudia Piromallo;Ana Crespo-Blanc;Laurent Jolivet

  • History of subduction and back‐arc extension in the Central Mediterranean

    Claudio Faccenna;Thorsten W. Becker;Francesco Pio Lucente;Laurent Jolivet

  • Aegean tectonics: Strain localisation, slab tearing and trench retreat

    Laurent Jolivet;Claudio Faccenna;Benjamin Huet;Loïc Labrousse

  • Midcrustal shear zones in postorogenic extension: Example from the northern Tyrrhenian Sea

    Laurent Jolivet;Claudio Faccenna;Bruno Goffé;Massimo Mattei

  • Mantle dynamics in the Mediterranean

    Claudio Faccenna;Thorsten W Becker;Ludwig Auer;Andrea Billi

  • Subduction tectonics and exhumation of high pressure metamorphic rocks in the Mediterranean orogens

    Laurent Jolivet;Claudio Faccenna;Bruno Goffé;Evgenii Burov

  • Slab detachment beneath eastern Anatolia: A possible cause for the formation of the North Anatolian fault

    Claudio Faccenna;Olivier Bellier;Joseph Martinod;Claudia Piromallo

  • Exhumation of high-pressure rocks driven by slab rollback

    Jean-Pierre Brun;Claudio Faccenna

  • A benchmark comparison of spontaneous subduction models – towards a free surface

    H. Schmeling;Andrey Babeyko;A. Enns;C. Faccenna

  • Vertical GPS ground motion rates in the Euro-Mediterranean region: New evidence of velocity gradients at different spatial scales along the Nubia-Eurasia plate boundary

    Enrico Serpelloni;Claudio Faccenna;Giorgio Spada;Danan Dong

  • Episodic Back-arc extension during restricted mantle convection in the Central Mediterranean

    Claudio Faccenna;Francesca Funiciello;Francesca Funiciello;Domenico Giardini;Pio Lucente

  • The dynamics of back‐arc extension: an experimental approach to the opening of the Tyrrhenian Sea

    Claudio Faccenna;Philippe Davy;Jean-Pierre Brun;Renato Funiciello

  • Subduction and the depth of convection in the Mediterranean mantle

    Claudio Faccenna;Laurent Jolivet;Claudia Piromallo;Andrea Morelli

  • Dynamics of retreating slabs : 2. Insights from three-dimensional laboratory experiments

    Francesca Funiciello;Claudio Faccenna;Domenico Giardini;Klaus Regenauer-Lieb

  • Flat subduction dynamics and deformation of the South American plate: Insights from analog modeling

    Nicolas Espurt;Nicolas Espurt;Francesca Funiciello;Joseph Martinod;Benjamin Guillaume

  • Subduction-triggered magmatic pulses: A new class of plumes?

    Claudio Faccenna;Thorsten W. Becker;Serge Lallemand;Yves Lagabrielle

  • From mantle to crust: Stretching the Mediterranean

    Laurent Jolivet;Claudio Faccenna;Claudia Piromallo

  • Mapping mantle flow during retreating subduction: Laboratory models analyzed by feature tracking

    Francesca Funiciello;M Moroni;C Piromallo;C Faccenna

  • Shaping mobile belts by small-scale convection

    Claudio Faccenna;Thorsten W. Becker

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesca Funiciello
Francesca Funiciello Roma Tre University
Thorsten W. Becker
Thorsten W. Becker The University of Texas at Austin
Federico Rossetti
Federico Rossetti Roma Tre University
Renato Funiciello
Renato Funiciello Roma Tre University
Laurent Jolivet
Laurent Jolivet Sorbonne University
Andrea Billi
Andrea Billi National Research Council (CNR)
Laurent Husson
Laurent Husson Grenoble Alpes University
Claudia Piromallo
Claudia Piromallo National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology
Massimo Mattei
Massimo Mattei Roma Tre University
Giorgio Ranalli
Giorgio Ranalli Carleton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science through online degrees opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. Many students enhance their skill sets by combining Earth Science with complementary fields such as language, art, and multimedia. For those interested in expanding communication skills alongside scientific knowledge, pursuing an online Spanish degree programs for veterans offers a practical route, blending cultural insights with global environmental issues.

Additionally, creative professionals looking to engage with environmental themes opt for degrees like a master of fine arts online, which can enrich storytelling and visual representation skills relevant to public outreach and education. Veterans particularly benefit from tailored programs such as veteran friendly online photography degree programs, where skills in imagery and spatial awareness complement Earth Science applications like geographic information systems (GIS) and field documentation.

For those prioritizing affordability and timely graduation, options highlighted in online Spanish degree programs provide a cost-effective, valued credential that pairs well with environmental studies focused on bilingual communication and policy. Combining these diverse skill sets can significantly enhance career prospects in fields such as environmental consulting, education, conservation, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Claudio Faccenna

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles