World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
6637
World Ranking
6770
National Ranking
192

Clare L. Parish publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clare L. Parish sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 128 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Clare L. Parish D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clare L. Parish sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clare L. Parish is affiliated with the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health in Australia. Their research spans key areas in both biomedical and neuroscience fields, focusing primarily on molecular and cellular mechanisms underpinning neural functions and regeneration.

The main fields of study in Parish's work include Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Neuroscience. Subfields cover Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Developmental Neuroscience, and Biomedical Engineering. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in their diverse research topics such as Pluripotent Stem Cells Research, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, Nerve Injury and Regeneration, Neurogenesis and Neuroplasticity Mechanisms, RNA Interference and Gene Delivery, 3D Printing in Biomedical Research, and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering.

Parish has contributed to multiple papers across prominent publication venues. Their frequent publication outlets include:

  • Cell stem cell
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Communications
  • Stem Cell Reports

Among their recent notable publications are:

  • "A reference human induced pluripotent stem cell line for large-scale collaborative studies," 2022, published in Cell stem cell
  • "Identification of cell barcodes from long-read single-cell RNA-seq with BLAZE," 2023, published in Genome biology
  • "Viral Delivery of GDNF Promotes Functional Integration of Human Stem Cell Grafts in Parkinson's Disease," 2020, published in Cell stem cell
  • "Spontaneous formation of β-sheet nano-barrels during the early aggregation of Alzheimer's amyloid beta," 2021, published in Nano Today
  • "A combined cell and gene therapy approach for homotopic reconstruction of midbrain dopamine pathways using human pluripotent stem cells," 2022, published in Cell stem cell

Collaborations are a significant part of Parish's research landscape. Frequent coauthors include Lachlan H. Thompson, Niamh Moriarty, Cameron J. Hunt, Deniz Kirik, and Richard J. Williams, with dozens of joint publications indicating ongoing cooperative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Macrophages and Microglia Produce Local Trophic Gradients That Stimulate Axonal Sprouting Toward but Not beyond the Wound Edge

    Peter Egerton Batchelor;Michelle J Porritt;P Martinello;C L Parish

  • Axonal sprouting following lesions of the rat substantia nigra.

    David I Finkelstein;Davor Stanic;Clare L Parish;Doris Tomas

  • Wnt5a-treated midbrain neural stem cells improve dopamine cell replacement therapy in parkinsonian mice

    Clare L. Parish;Gonçalo Castelo-Branco;Nina Rawal;Jan Tonnesen

  • Three-Dimensional Nanofibrous Scaffolds Incorporating Immobilized BDNF Promote Proliferation and Differentiation of Cortical Neural Stem Cells

    Malcolm K. Horne;Malcolm K. Horne;David R. Nisbet;David R. Nisbet;John S. Forsythe;Clare L. Parish

  • Inhibition of amyloid beta toxicity in zebrafish with a chaperone-gold nanoparticle dual strategy

    Ibrahim Javed;Guotao Peng;Yanting Xing;Tianyu Yu

  • Liver X Receptors and Oxysterols Promote Ventral Midbrain Neurogenesis In Vivo and in Human Embryonic Stem Cells

    Paola Sacchetti;Kyle M. Sousa;Kyle M. Sousa;Anita C. Hall;Anita C. Hall;Isabel Liste

  • The Role of Dopamine Receptors in Regulating the Size of Axonal Arbors

    C L Parish;David Finkelstein;John Drago;Emilliano Borrelli

  • Midbrain dopaminergic neurogenesis and behavioural recovery in a salamander lesion-induced regeneration model.

    Clare L. Parish;Anna Beljajeva;Ernest Arenas;András Simon

  • An efficient method for the derivation of mouse embryonic stem cells.

    Vitezslav Bryja;Sonia Bonilla;Lukas Cajanek;Clare L. Parish

  • Biomaterials for Brain Tissue Engineering

    Jerani T. S. Pettikiriarachchi;Clare L. Parish;Molly S. Shoichet;John S. Forsythe

  • The role of interleukin-1, interleukin-6, and glia in inducing growth of neuronal terminal arbors in mice.

    Clare L. Parish;David I. Finkelstein;Wanida Tripanichkul;Abhay R. Satoskar

  • Functionalized composite scaffolds improve the engraftment of transplanted dopaminergic progenitors in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease.

    Ting Yi Wang;Kiara F. Bruggeman;Jessica A. Kauhausen;Alexandra L. Rodriguez

  • Huntingtin Inclusions Trigger Cellular Quiescence, Deactivate Apoptosis, and Lead to Delayed Necrosis.

    Yasmin M. Ramdzan;Mikhail M. Trubetskov;Angelique R Ormsby;Estella A. Newcombe

  • Functional Integration of Grafted Neural Stem Cell-Derived Dopaminergic Neurons Monitored by Optogenetics in an In Vitro Parkinson Model

    Jan Tønnesen;Clare L Parish;Andreas Toft Sörensen;Angelica Andersson

  • Wnt5a regulates midbrain dopaminergic axon growth and guidance.

    Brette D. Blakely;Christopher R. Bye;Chathurini V. Fernando;Malcolm K. Horne;Malcolm K. Horne

  • Peptide-Based Scaffolds Support Human Cortical Progenitor Graft Integration to Reduce Atrophy and Promote Functional Repair in a Model of Stroke

    Fahad A. Somaa;Ting‐Yi Wang;Jonathan Christos Niclis;Kiara F. Bruggeman

  • The human testis‐determining factor SRY localizes in midbrain dopamine neurons and regulates multiple components of catecholamine synthesis and metabolism

    Daniel Peter Czech;Joohyung Lee;Helena Yin Yee Sim;Clare L Parish

  • Promoting engraftment of transplanted neural stem cells/progenitors using biofunctionalised electrospun scaffolds

    Ting Yi Wang;John Stanley Forsythe;David Russell Nisbet;Clare Parish

  • Birth dating of midbrain dopamine neurons identifies A9 enriched tissue for transplantation into parkinsonian mice.

    Christopher R. Bye;Lachlan H. Thompson;Clare L. Parish

  • Viral Delivery of GDNF Promotes Functional Integration of Human Stem Cell Grafts in Parkinson's Disease.

    Carlos W. Gantner;Isabelle R. de Luzy;Jessica A. Kauhausen;Niamh Moriarty

  • Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Blockade Promotes Neuronal Induction and Dopaminergic Differentiation in Embryonic Stem Cells

    Lukás̆ C̆ajánek;Diogo Ribeiro;Isabel Liste;Isabel Liste;Clare L. Parish;Clare L. Parish

  • Effects of long-term treatment with dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists on terminal arbor size.

    C L Parish;D Stanic;John Drago;Emilliano Borrelli

  • Cripto as a target for improving embryonic stem cell-based therapy in Parkinson's disease.

    Clare L. Parish;Silvia Parisi;Maria G. Persico;Ernest Arenas

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. Nisbet
David R. Nisbet University of Melbourne
Malcolm K. Horne
Malcolm K. Horne Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Richard J. Williams
Richard J. Williams Deakin University
David Finkelstein
David Finkelstein St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
John Drago
John Drago University of Melbourne
Ernest Arenas
Ernest Arenas Karolinska Institute
Andrew J. Lawrence
Andrew J. Lawrence Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Andrew G. Elefanty
Andrew G. Elefanty University of Melbourne
John S. Forsythe
John S. Forsythe Monash University
Edouard G. Stanley
Edouard G. Stanley University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking about careers related to neuroscience? Many options are available online to help you advance your qualifications and skills. For those looking for quick, career-boosting credentials, consider certificates online that can lead to high-paying opportunities in health care, research, or therapy support roles.

If you're seeking faster entry into the workforce, some may explore the easiest degree to get online, which could include psychology or social sciences—fields closely connected to neuroscience.

Specialized advanced degrees such as online msw programs (Master of Social Work) equip graduates to work in clinical or counseling settings, often serving those with neurological or psychological disorders.

Additionally, pursuing bcba programs online (Board Certified Behavior Analyst) enables professionals to work with individuals with behavioral and developmental challenges, a rewarding pathway that often intersects with neuroscience applications.

By exploring these diverse online options, you can find accessible and affordable ways to build a meaningful career that complements your interest in neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Clare L. Parish

Trending Scientists