World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christopher L. Barrett

Christopher L. Barrett

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
4542
World Ranking
12232
National Ranking
4961

Christopher L. Barrett publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher L. Barrett sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 129 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Christopher L. Barrett D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher L. Barrett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christopher L. Barrett is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Modeling and Simulation, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics as subfields.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Influenza Virus Research Studies

Christopher L. Barrett has authored multiple papers in notable journals and conferences. Selected recent publications include:

  • Commentary on Ferguson, et al., "Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) to Reduce COVID-19 Mortality and Healthcare Demand," 2020, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
  • Forecasting influenza activity using machine-learned mobility map, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Prioritizing allocation of COVID-19 vaccines based on social contacts increases vaccination effectiveness, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Heterogeneous adaptive behavioral responses may increase epidemic burden, 2022, Scientific Reports
  • Networked experiments and modeling for producing collective identity in a group of human subjects using an iterative abduction framework, 2020, Social Network Analysis and Mining

The scientist has frequently published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, Nature Communications, Scientific Reports, and the Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.

Christopher L. Barrett's collaborative network includes frequent coauthors:

  • Madhav Marathe
  • Bryan Lewis
  • Srinivasan Venkatramanan
  • Jiangzhuo Chen
  • Anil Vullikanti

Best Publications

  • EpiSimdemics: an efficient algorithm for simulating the spread of infectious disease over large realistic social networks

    Christopher L. Barrett;Keith R. Bisset;Stephen G. Eubank;Xizhou Feng

  • Formal-Language-Constrained Path Problems

    Chris Barrett;Riko Jacob;Madhav Marathe

  • Characterizing the interaction between routing and MAC protocols in ad-hoc networks

    Chris Barrett;Achla Marathe;Madhav V. Marathe;Martin Drozda

  • The distance-2 matching problem and its relationship to the MAC-Layer capacity of ad hoc wireless networks

    H. Balakrishnan;C.L. Barrett;V.S.A. Kumar;M.V. Marathe

  • Generation and analysis of large synthetic social contact networks

    Christopher L. Barrett;Richard J. Beckman;Maleq Khan;V. S. Anil Kumar

  • Elements of a theory of simulation II: sequential dynamical systems

    C. L. Barrett;H. S. Mortveit;C. M. Reidys

  • Parametric probabilistic sensor network routing

    Christopher L. Barrett;Stephan J. Eidenbenz;Lukas Kroc;Madhav Marathe

  • Elements of a theory of computer simulation I: Sequential CA over random graphs

    C. L. Barrett;C. M. Reidys

  • Using Microsimulation Feedback For Trip Adaptation For Realistic Traffic In Dallas

    Kai Nagel;Kai Nagel;Christopher L Barrett;Christopher L Barrett

  • Elements of a Theory of Simulation

    Steen Rasmussen;Steen Rasmussen;Christopher L. Barrett;Christopher L. Barrett

  • Elements of a theory of simulation III: equivalence of SDS

    C. L. Barrett;H. S. Mortveit;C. M. Reidys

  • Complexity of reachability problems for finite discrete dynamical systems

    Christopher L. Barrett;Harry B. Hunt;Madhav V. Marathe;S. S. Ravi

  • Strong edge coloring for channel assignment in wireless radio networks

    C.L. Barrett;G. Istrate;V.S.A. Kumar;M.V. Marathe

  • Modeling and simulation of large biological, information and socio-technical systems: an interaction based approach

    Chris Barrett;Stephen Eubank;Madhav Marathe

  • TRANSIMS traffic flow characteristics

    Kai Nagel;Paula Stretz;Martin Pieck;Shannon Leckey

  • Population mobility generator and simulator

    Christopher Barrett;Richard Beckman;Stephen Eubank;Madhav Marathe

  • Gardens of Eden and Fixed Points in Sequential Dynamical Systems

    Christopher Barrett;Marry Hunt;Madhav Marathe;S. Ravi

  • Engineering Label-Constrained Shortest-Path Algorithms

    Chris Barrett;Keith Bisset;Martin Holzer;Goran Konjevod

  • Economic and social impact of influenza mitigation strategies by demographic class.

    Christopher L. Barrett;Keith Bisset;Jonathan Leidig;Achla Marathe

  • Reachability problems for sequential dynamical systems with threshold functions

    Chris Barrett;Harry B. Hunt;Madhav V. Marathe;S. S. Ravi

Frequent Co-Authors

Madhav V. Marathe
Madhav V. Marathe University of Virginia
S. S. Ravi
S. S. Ravi University of Virginia
Kai Nagel
Kai Nagel Technical University of Berlin
Richard Edwin Stearns
Richard Edwin Stearns University at Albany, State University of New York
Daniel J. Rosenkrantz
Daniel J. Rosenkrantz University of Virginia
Aravind Srinivasan
Aravind Srinivasan University of Maryland, College Park
Anand Sivasubramaniam
Anand Sivasubramaniam Pennsylvania State University
Naren Ramakrishnan
Naren Ramakrishnan Virginia Tech
Michael W. Macy
Michael W. Macy Cornell University
Noshir Contractor
Noshir Contractor Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a variety of technical and engineering fields. As technology continually evolves, many students and professionals explore related disciplines to broaden their career options. For instance, those interested in engineering may consider finding the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online to gain hands-on skills in machine design, robotics, and manufacturing.

Physics is another foundational science that overlaps with Computer Science, especially in research and tech innovation. If you’re looking to expand your expertise, you might want to check the cheapest online physics degree programs to combine strong analytical training with your computing background.

Data Science is a rapidly growing field that leverages both statistics and computer programming. For students seeking affordable specialization, learning about the cheapest master in data science can help you become a data-driven decision maker for any industry.

Electrical engineering is another promising career pathway for computer science graduates. For those interested in program quality and reputation, exploring the online electrical engineering degree ranking is essential to finding the right fit. These interconnected options strengthen your credentials in today's tech-focused job market.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher L. Barrett

Trending Scientists