World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
4900
World Ranking
9037
National Ranking
3818

Charles W. Bradberry publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles W. Bradberry sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Charles W. Bradberry D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles W. Bradberry sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles W. Bradberry is affiliated with the National Institute on Drug Abuse in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a focus on topics related to neural mechanisms, behavior, and neuropharmacology.

The main fields of study for Bradberry include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Within these broader disciplines, their subfields of specialization comprise:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The central topics addressed in Bradberry's work include:

  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

The scientist has published in several academic venues, with notable frequency in:

  • Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • NeuroImage
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Among their recent papers are:

  • The neurobiology of drug addiction: cross-species insights into the dysfunction and recovery of the prefrontal cortex (2021), Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Long-Term Cocaine Self-administration Produces Structural Brain Changes That Correlate With Altered Cognition (2020), Biological Psychiatry
  • Strengths and challenges of longitudinal non-human primate neuroimaging (2021), NeuroImage
  • Translational PET applications for brain circuit mapping with transgenic neuromodulation tools (2021), Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
  • Economic choice between remifentanil and food in squirrel monkeys (2021), Neuropsychopharmacology

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Hank P. Jedema
  • Devin P. Effinger
  • Elliot A. Stein
  • Jacquelin C Hecker
  • Xiaowei Song

Best Publications

  • Cocaethylene: A neuropharmacologically active metabolite assciated with concurrent cocaine-ethanol ingestion

    P. Jatlow;J. D. Elsworth;C. W. Bradberry;Gail D. Winger

  • Microdialysis and SPECT Measurements of Amphetamine-Induced Dopamine Release in Nonhuman Primates

    Marc Laruelle;Marc Laruelle;Raj N. Iyer;Raj N. Iyer;Mohammed S. Al-Tikriti;Mohammed S. Al-Tikriti;Yolanda Zea-Ponce;Yolanda Zea-Ponce

  • Cocaine increases extracellular dopamine in rat nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area as shown by in vivo microdialysis.

    Charles W. Bradberry;Robert H. Roth

  • Psychostimulant Abuse and Neuroinflammation: Emerging Evidence of Their Interconnection

    Kenneth H. Clark;Clayton A. Wiley;Charles W. Bradberry

  • Cocaine and Cocaethylene: Microdialysis Comparison of Brain Drug Levels and Effects on Dopamine and Serotonin

    Charles W. Bradberry;J. B. Nobiletti;J. D. Elsworth;B. Murphy

  • Cognitive impact of genetic variation of the serotonin transporter in primates is associated with differences in brain morphology rather than serotonin neurotransmission

    Hank P. Jedema;Peter J. Gianaros;Phillip J. Greer;Dustin D. Kerr

  • Effect of ethanol on extracellular 5-HT and glutamate in the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex: Comparison between the Lewis and Fischer 344 rat strains

    Unknown

  • Regulation of excitatory amino acid release by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in rat striatum: in vivo microdialysis studies.

    Gonzalo Bustos;Jorge Abarca;María Inés Forray;Katia Gysling

  • Serotonin-mediated increase in prefrontal cortex dopamine release: pharmacological characterization.

    Unknown

  • The Anxiogenic β-Carboline FG 7142 Selectively Increases Dopamine Release in Rat Prefrontal Cortex as Measured by Microdialysis

    Charles W. Bradberry;John D. Lory;Robert H. Roth

  • The neurobiology of drug addiction: cross-species insights into the dysfunction and recovery of the prefrontal cortex

    Ahmet O Ceceli;Charles W Bradberry;Rita Z Goldstein

  • Clozapine Preferentially Increases Dopamine Release in the Rhesus Monkey Prefrontal Cortex Compared with the Caudate Nucleus

    Kenneth D Youngren;Fiona M Inglis;Philip J Pivirotto;Hank P Jedema

  • Individual differences in behavioral measures: Correlations with nucleus accumbens dopamine measured by microdialysis

    Charles W. Bradberry;Rand J. Gruen;Rand J. Gruen;Craig W. Berridge;Craig W. Berridge;Robert H. Roth

  • Local anesthetic effects of cocaethylene and isopropylcocaine on rat peripheral nerves.

    Hajime A. Tokuno;Charles W. Bradberry;Brian Everill;Samuel K. Agulian

  • Chronic Cocaine Self-Administration in Rhesus Monkeys: Impact on Associative Learning, Cognitive Control, and Working Memory

    Unknown

  • Acute and Chronic Dopamine Dynamics in a Nonhuman Primate Model of Recreational Cocaine Use

    Unknown

  • Mesocortical dopamine neurons: high basal firing frequency predicts tyrosine dependence of dopamine synthesis.

    S. Y. Tam;J. D. Elsworth;C. W. Bradberry;R. H. Roth

  • NMDA antagonist effects on striatal dopamine release: Microdialysis studies in awake monkeys

    Barbara W. Adams;Charles W. Bradberry;Bita Moghaddam

  • Cocaine sensitization and dopamine mediation of cue effects in rodents, monkeys, and humans: areas of agreement, disagreement, and implications for addiction

    Unknown

  • MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) inhibits the firing of dorsal raphe neurons in brain slices via release of serotonin.

    Jeffrey S. Sprouse;Charles W. Bradberry;Robert H. Roth;George K. Aghajanian

  • Cryopreservation of human brain tissue

    Richard J. Robbins;Ignacio Torres-Aleman;Csaba Leranth;Charles W. Bradberry

  • Regionally-specific alterations in mesotelencephalic dopamine synthesis in diabetic rats: association with precursor tyrosine

    C W Bradberry;D H Karasic;A Y Deutch;R H Roth

  • [123I]Iomazenil spect imaging demonstrates significant benzodiazepine receptor reserve in human and nonhuman primate brain

    E. Sybirska;J.P. Seibyl;J.D. Bremner;R.M. Baldwin

  • The role of serotonin in the actions of psychostimulants: molecular and pharmacological analyses

    Kathryn A. Cunningham;Charles W. Bradberry;Albert S. Chang;Maarten E.A. Reith

  • Tonic exploration governs both flexibility and lapses.

    R. Becket Ebitz;Brianna J. Sleezer;Hank P. Jedema;Charles W. Bradberry

  • Choice between delayed food and immediate opioids in rats: treatment effects and individual differences.

    Leigh V. Panlilio;Maria E. Secci;Charles W. Schindler;Charles W. Bradberry

  • A touch screen based Stop Signal Response Task in rhesus monkeys for studying impulsivity associated with chronic cocaine self-administration.

    Shijing Liu;Richard P. Heitz;Charles W. Bradberry;Charles W. Bradberry

  • Alcohol plus cocaine: the whole is more than the sum of its parts.

    Peter Jatlow;Elinore F. McCance;Charles W. Bradberry;John D. Elsworth

  • Long-Term Cocaine Self-administration Produces Structural Brain Changes That Correlate With Altered Cognition

    Hank P. Jedema;Xiaowei Song;Howard J. Aizenstein;Alexandra R. Bonner

Frequent Co-Authors

Elliot A. Stein
Elliot A. Stein National Institute on Drug Abuse
Yihong Yang
Yihong Yang National Institute on Drug Abuse
Benjamin Y. Hayden
Benjamin Y. Hayden Baylor College of Medicine
Marco Pistis
Marco Pistis University of Cagliari
Leigh V. Panlilio
Leigh V. Panlilio National Institute on Drug Abuse
Howard J. Aizenstein
Howard J. Aizenstein University of Pittsburgh
Suliann Ben Hamed
Suliann Ben Hamed Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Rita Z. Goldstein
Rita Z. Goldstein Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Luca Ferraro
Luca Ferraro University of Ferrara
Sergi Ferré
Sergi Ferré National Institute on Drug Abuse

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often inspires students to pursue careers that blend brain science, mental health, and therapeutic practice. There are several flexible, online degree options in related fields, making it easier to match your studies with career goals.

For those considering counseling, enrolling in a cacrep-accredited program is a key step. These programs meet professional standards and can open doors to licensure. Students interested in broader mental health roles may find value in online mental health degree programs, which cover a range of counseling and support specialties.

If family dynamics or couples therapy are of interest, consider one of the best online mft programs. A master’s in marriage and family therapy can lead to licensure and specialized practice.

Additionally, pursuing an online masters in psychology can prepare you for research, clinical, or educational roles. Each of these pathways offers new opportunities to combine neuroscience insights with real-world service and transformative careers.

Best Scientists Citing Charles W. Bradberry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles