World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charles R. Slater

Charles R. Slater

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
32
Citations
10635
World Ranking
9501
National Ranking
2677

Charles R. Slater publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles R. Slater sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 58 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Charles R. Slater D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles R. Slater sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Apparatus for delivering instrument over endoscope

    Juergen A Kortenbach;Michael Sean Mcbrayer;Charles R Slater

  • Robotic Surgical System

    Smith Kevin;Koretnbach Juergen Andrew;Slater Charles R;Mazzeo Anthony I

  • Radial jaw biopsy forceps

    Thomas O. Bales;Charles R. Slater;Kevin W. Smith

  • Apparatus for counting the number of times a medical instrument has been used

    Charles R. Slater;Thomas O. Bales;Jurgen Andrew Kortenbach;George Nunez

  • Endoscopic surgical instruments

    Thomas O. Bales;John W. Box;Gregory J. Murphy;Frank A. Scarfone

  • Apparatus for counting the number of times a surgical instrument has been used

    Jurgen A. Kortenbach;George Nunez;Charles R. Slater

  • Endoscopic electrosurgical suction-irrigation instrument

    Juan J. Arias;Thomas O. Bales;Jourgen Andrew Kortenbach;Dana Wm. Ryan

  • Endoscopic instrument having non-bonded, non-welded rotating actuator handle and method for assembling the same

    Michael Sean McBrayer;Charles R. Slater;Juergen Andrew Kortenbach;Saul Gottlieb

  • Endoscopic surgical instruments having rotatable end effectors

    Thomas O. Bales;Kevin W. Smith;Charles R. Slater;Frank A. Scarfone

  • Tubing for endoscopic electrosurgical suction-irrigation instrument

    Dana W. Ryan;Charles R. Slater;Matthew S. Solar;David Turkel

  • Sperrklinken-Mechanismus für chirurgische Instrumente

    Thomas O Bales;Kevin W Smith;Charles R Slater;Frank A Scarfone

  • Instrument for applying a surgical fastener particularly for the transoral treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (gerd)

    Robert Sixto;Kevin W. Smith;Juergen A. Kortenbach;Michael Sean Mcbrayer

  • Super-elastische flexibele spannbackenanordnung

    A. Matthew Palmer;R. Charles Slater;David Turkel

  • Rotatable and deflectable biopsy forceps

    Juergen A. Kortenbach;Saul Gottlieb;Kevin W. Smith;Charles R. Slater

  • Endoscopic instruments having detachable proximal handle and distal portions

    Charles R. Slater;Jurgen A. Kortenbach;Herbert Cohen;George Nunez

  • Luminal port device having internal and external sealing mechanisms

    Charles S. Termin;Kevin W. Smith;Charles R. Slater;Saul Gottlieb

  • Methods and apparatus for treating the interior of a blood vessel

    Charles R. Slater;Brett E. Naglreiter;Scott L. Jahrmarkt;Thomas O. Bales

  • Sharply angled surgical clamp

    Moises Jacobs;Charles R. Slater;Kevin W. Smith

  • Radioactive therapeutic seeds having fixation structure

    Charles R. Slater;Kevin W. Smith;Scott L. Jahrmarkt;Scott T. Smith

  • Helically advanceable endoscopic needle device

    Kevin W. Smith;Juergen A. Kortenbach;Charles R. Slater

  • Endoscopic scissors having scissor elements loosely engaged with a clevis

    Charles R. Slater;Jurgen A. Kortenbach;John Starkey

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas O. Bales
Thomas O. Bales Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Kevin W. Smith
Kevin W. Smith Johnson & Johnson (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and technology students in the USA often explore diverse online education and career options to expand their skill set and boost employability. Many choose complementary degree programs or certificates that provide specialized knowledge and flexibility.

Finance is a popular pathway that pairs well with engineering and tech expertise. You can broaden your career opportunities by pursuing an online finance degree, which allows for flexible learning and accelerated completion. Those aiming for leadership roles might also consider one of the top accelerated MBA programs to gain a competitive edge in management and business strategy.

Additionally, technical professionals benefit from understanding legal or administrative processes. Enrolling in an accelerated paralegal program can help engineers and technologists navigate intellectual property, compliance, and contracts. For those interested in finance or operations, accredited bookkeeping courses offer practical skills relevant to both startups and established companies.

Exploring these online programs lets you diversify your expertise, making you more adaptable in today’s rapidly changing job market.

Best Scientists Citing Charles R. Slater

Recently Published Articles