World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 59 3224 3050 67 63 203 14998

Cecilia Saccone publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cecilia Saccone between 1959 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cecilia Saccone published across 60 years, from 1959 to 2018, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1995. 1 of the 215 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1995. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 1 publication 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 2 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 2 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 5 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 4 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 8 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication
1959 2018

215 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cecilia Saccone: publications per year, 1959 to 2018
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 0
1961 1
1962 1
1963 0
1964 1
1965 1
1966 0
1967 2
1968 0
1969 0
1970 2
1971 1
1972 2
1973 2
1974 5
1975 1
1976 4
1977 4
1978 5
1979 5
1980 3
1981 4
1982 6
1983 7
1984 5
1985 3
1986 2
1987 7
1988 3
1989 7
1990 5
1991 6
1992 7
1993 3
1994 8
1995 12
1996 9
1997 7
1998 6
1999 11
2000 8
2001 1
2002 8
2003 6
2004 7
2005 7
2006 5
2007 4
2008 4
2009 3
2010 0
2011 1
2012 1
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 1
Total 215
Download as CSV

Cecilia Saccone publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cecilia Saccone sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 195–204 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 203 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173 203
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Cecilia Saccone D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cecilia Saccone sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162 59
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Cecilia Saccone is affiliated with the University of Bari Aldo Moro in Italy. Their academic career is noted for contributions recognized by a notable professional distinction, being named a Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO).

While specific details about research papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications are not listed, the EMBO membership indicates involvement in the molecular biology community at a European level.

The data does not specify particular scientific fields, subfields, or topics of study, nor does it list recent publications or detailed research outputs. The absence of those specifics limits a detailed description of their academic focus.

The scientist is currently active and not deceased, and their professional profile is anchored at a reputable Italian university known for its contribution to research and higher education.

Best Publications

  • A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates

    C. Lanave;G. Preparata;C. Saccone;Gabriella Serio

  • The complete nucleotide sequence of the Rattus norvegicus mitochondrial genome: cryptic signals revealed by comparative analysis between vertebrates.

    G. Gadaleta;G. Pepe;G. De Candia;C. Quagliariello

  • Mammalian mitochondrial D-loop region structural analysis: identification of new conserved sequences and their functional and evolutionary implications

    Elisabetta Sbisà;Filomena Tanzariello;Aurelio Reyes;Graziano Pesole

  • Evolutionary genomics in Metazoa: the mitochondrial DNA as a model system.

    Cecilia Saccone;Carla De Giorgi;Carmela Gissi;Graziano Pesole

  • Nucleotide substitution rate of mammalian mitochondrial genomes.

    Graziano Pesole;Carmela Gissi;Anna De Chirico;Cecilia Saccone

  • Structural conservation and variation in the D-loop-containing region of vertebrate mitochondrial DNA☆

    Gregory G. Brown;Gemma Gadaleta;Gabriella Pepe;Cecilia Saccone

  • The main regulatory region of mammalian mitochondrial DNA: structure-function model and evolutionary pattern.

    Cecilia Saccone;Graziano Pesole;Elisabetta Sbisá

  • The guinea-pig is not a rodent

    Anna Maria D'Erchia;Anna Maria D'Erchia;Carmela Gissi;Carmela Gissi;Graziano Pesole;Cecilia Saccone;Cecilia Saccone

  • Asymmetrical directional mutation pressure in the mitochondrial genome of mammals.

    Aurelio Reyes;Carmela Gissi;Graziano Pesole;Cecilia Saccone

  • UTRdb and UTRsite: specialized databases of sequences and functional elements of 5' and 3' untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNAs. Update 2002.

    Graziano Pesole;Sabino Liuni;Giorgio Grillo;Flavio Licciulli

  • Evolutionary analysis of cytochrome b sequences in some perciformes: Evidence for a slower rate of evolution than in mammals

    P Cantatore;M Roberti;G Pesole;A Ludovico

  • Structural elements highly preserved during the evolution of the D-loop-containing region in vertebrate mitochondrial DNA.

    C. Saccone;M. Attimonelli;E. Sbisà

  • The complete nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code of the mitochondrial genome of Paracentrotus lividus.

    Palmiro Cantatore;Marina Roberti;Guglielmo Rainaldi;Maria N. Gadaleta

  • Duplication and remoulding of tRNA genes during the evolutionary rearrangement of mitochondrial genomes.

    P. Cantatore;M. N. Gadaleta;M. Roberti;C. Saccone

  • Evolution of the mitochondrial genetic system: an overview.

    Cecilia Saccone;Carmela Gissi;Cecilia Lanave;Alessandra Larizza

  • UTRdb and UTRsite: a collection of sequences and regulatory motifs of the untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNAs

    Flavio Mignone;Giorgio Grillo;Flavio Licciulli;Michele Iacono

  • Evolutionary patterns of the mitochondrial genome in Metazoa: Exploring the role of mutation and selection in mitochondrial protein-coding genes

    S. Castellana;S. Vicario;C. Saccone;C. Saccone

  • Influence of base composition on quantitative estimates of gene evolution.

    Cecilia Saccone;Cecilia Lanave;Graziano Pesole;Giuliano Preparata

  • Glutamine synthetase gene evolution: a good molecular clock.

    G Pesole;M P Bozzetti;C Lanave;G Preparata

  • Where Do Rodents Fit? Evidence from the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Sciurus vulgaris

    Aurelio Reyes;Carmela Gissi;Graziano Pesole;François M. Catzeflis

Frequent Co-Authors

Graziano Pesole
Graziano Pesole University of Bari Aldo Moro
Salvatore Passarella
Salvatore Passarella University of Molise
David S. Horner
David S. Horner University of Milan
Sergio Papa
Sergio Papa University of Bari Aldo Moro
Rita Casadio
Rita Casadio University of Bologna
Wojciech Makalowski
Wojciech Makalowski University of Münster
Eviatar Nevo
Eviatar Nevo University of Haifa
Volker Knoop
Volker Knoop University of Bonn
Claudio Scazzocchio
Claudio Scazzocchio Imperial College London
Axel Brennicke
Axel Brennicke University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in genetics, there are several related online degrees and career pathways to consider. The healthcare sector, in particular, offers strong job prospects and flexible study options for science-oriented students. Programs such as an online nurse practitioner program can be a smart next step for those with a foundational science education looking to expand their clinical expertise.

Cost is a big factor when exploring further study. If you're wondering how much is online nursing school, you'll find that tuition can vary widely depending on the program and institution. Affordable study pathways, such as cheap online dnp programs, allow working professionals to advance their credentials and career prospects without incurring significant debt.

Additionally, programs like cheap rn to bsn programs are ideal for registered nurses aiming to upgrade their skills and qualify for higher-level positions. Exploring these online options can open doors in genetics research, clinical practice, healthcare management, and beyond—making it easier than ever to tailor your study to your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Cecilia Saccone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles