World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 32 3479 3167 8 8 56 3787

Bushra Naqvi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bushra Naqvi between 2008 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bushra Naqvi published across 17 years, from 2008 to 2024, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2020. 7 of the 58 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2020. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 10 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications
2008 2024

58 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bushra Naqvi: publications per year, 2008 to 2024
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 2
2010 1
2011 2
2012 1
2013 4
2014 3
2015 1
2016 0
2017 5
2018 2
2019 1
2020 10
2021 8
2022 10
2023 5
2024 2
Total 58
Download as CSV

Bushra Naqvi publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bushra Naqvi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 52–56 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 56 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7 56
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Bushra Naqvi D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bushra Naqvi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157 32
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Bushra Naqvi is affiliated with Lahore University of Management Sciences in Pakistan and has contributed extensively to the field of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance. Their primary research interests are reflected in a range of publications that focus on the intersections of financial markets, environmental sustainability, and economic dynamics.

Naqvi's recent notable papers include:

  • "Can Fintech development pave the way for a transition towards low-carbon economy: A global perspective" (2021), published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • "Carbon neutrality, bank lending, and credit risk: Evidence from the Eurozone" (2021), published in Journal of Environmental Management
  • "Price reaction, volatility timing and funds' performance during Covid-19" (2020), published in Finance Research Letters
  • "Trade and technological innovation: The catalysts for climate change and way forward for COP21" (2020), published in Journal of Environmental Management
  • "Impact of Covid-19 on corporate solvency and possible policy responses in the EU" (2020), published in The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance

Their work spans several thematic areas within their main field of study, including:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Finance
  • Accounting
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Information Systems

The major topics covered in Naqvi's research include:

  • Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability

Frequent publication venues for Naqvi's research outputs highlight engagement with journals oriented towards forecasting, economics, and finance. The most common outlets include:

  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • Energy Economics
  • International Review of Financial Analysis
  • Resources Policy
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Collaboration features prominently in Naqvi's work, with frequent co-authors being:

  • Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi
  • Nawazish Mirza
  • Muhammad Umar
  • Larisa Yarovaya
  • Birjees Rahat

Best Publications

  • Can Fintech development pave the way for a transition towards low-carbon economy: A global perspective

    Ran Tao;Chi-Wei Su;Bushra Naqvi;Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi

  • Carbon neutrality, bank lending, and credit risk: Evidence from the Eurozone.

    Muhammad Umar;Xiangfeng Ji;Nawazish Mirza;Bushra Naqvi

  • Price reaction, volatility timing and funds' performance during Covid-19.

    Nawazish Mirza;Bushra Naqvi;Birjees Rahat;Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi

  • Financial market development: A potentiating policy choice for the green transition in G7 economies

    Unknown

  • Trade and technological innovation: The catalysts for climate change and way forward for COP21

    Chi-Wei Su;Bushra Naqvi;Xue-Feng Shao;Jing-Ping Li

  • Impact of Covid-19 on Corporate Solvency and Possible Policy Responses in the EU.

    Nawazish Mirza;Birjees Rahat;Bushra Naqvi;Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi

  • Is there a green fund premium? Evidence from twenty seven emerging markets

    Bushra Naqvi;Nawazish Mirza;Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi;Małgorzata Porada-Rochoń

  • Safe haven properties of green, Islamic, and crypto assets and investor's proclivity towards treasury and gold

    Unknown

  • The impact of human capital efficiency on Latin American mutual funds during Covid-19 outbreak

    Nawazish Mirza;Jamila Abaidi Hasnaoui;Bushra Naqvi;Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi

  • Is Digital Adoption the way forward to Curb Energy Poverty?

    Unknown

  • The power play of natural gas and crude oil in the move towards the financialization of the energy market

    Unknown

  • The volatility of natural resource prices and its impact on the economic growth for natural resource-dependent economies: A comparison of oil and gold dependent economies

    Lu Guan;Wei-Wei Zhang;Ferhana Ahmad;Bushra Naqvi

  • The resilience of Islamic equity funds during COVID-19: Evidence from risk adjusted performance, investment styles and volatility timing

    Nawazish Mirza;Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi;Irum Saba;Bushra Naqvi

  • Green trade or green technology? The way forward for G-7 economies to achieve COP 26 targets while making competing policy choices

    Unknown

  • Going beyond sustainability: The diversification benefits of green energy financial products

    Unknown

  • Dance with the devil? The nexus of fourth industrial revolution, technological financial products and volatility spillovers in global financial system

    Muhammad Umar;Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi;Bushra Naqvi

  • Comparative risk adjusted performance of Islamic, socially responsible and conventional funds: Evidence from United Kingdom

    Krishna Reddy;Nawazish Mirza;Bushra Naqvi;Mingli Fu

  • Is green investment different from grey? Return and volatility spillovers between green and grey energy ETFs

    Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi;Bushra Naqvi;Nawazish Mirza

  • Bitcoin: The biggest financial innovation of fourth industrial revolution and a portfolio's efficiency booster

    Jing-Ping Li;Bushra Naqvi;Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi;Hsu-Ling Chang

  • N-11 countries: Are the new victims of resource-curse?

    Yumei Li;Bushra Naqvi;Ersin Caglar;Chien-Chi Chu

  • The impact of COVID-19 on valuations of non-financial European firms

    Rizvi Ska;Rizvi Ska;Yarovaya L;Mirza N;Naqvi B

  • The Resilience of Islamic Equity Funds during COVID-19: Evidence from Risk Adjusted Performance, Investment Styles and Volatility Timing

    Larisa Yarovaya;Nawazish Mirza;Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi;Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi;Irum Saba

  • Is Pakistan Ready to Embrace Fintech Innovation

    Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi;Bushra Naqvi;Fatima Tanveer

  • Asset Prices, Financial Stability and Monetary Policy

    Syed Kumail;Abbas Rizvi;Bushra Naqvi;Nawazish Mirza

Frequent Co-Authors

Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi
Syed Kumail Abbas Rizvi Lahore University of Management Sciences
Nawazish Mirza
Nawazish Mirza Excelia Business School
Larisa Yarovaya
Larisa Yarovaya University of Southampton
Chi-Wei Su
Chi-Wei Su Qingdao University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Economics and Finance can open doors to dynamic career pathways. For those interested in management roles, a project management degree worth it is essential reading to understand the value and potential ROI of this qualification. In addition, it's important to consider tuition fee differences—our online project management degrees cost comparison highlights programs that offer robust education without breaking the bank.

If you’re eager to fast-track your career, one year mba programs in usa are increasingly popular for their speed and efficiency, enabling students to gain advanced business skills in a condensed format. Alternatively, those looking to fuel their entrepreneurial ambitions can benefit from specialized curricula through an mba program entrepreneurship. These programs cater to aspiring business founders, offering practical tools and networking opportunities.

With a range of flexible options, choosing the right online degree can help you build valuable expertise and expand your professional network, no matter your specific focus within the field.

Best Scientists Citing Bushra Naqvi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles