World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bruce Milliken

Bruce Milliken

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
4385
World Ranking
11172
National Ranking
776

Bruce Milliken publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Milliken sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 100 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bruce Milliken D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Milliken sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Selective attention: a reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.

    Bruce Milliken;Steve Joordens;Philip M. Merikle;Adriane E. Seiffert

  • The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: location as a contextual cue.

    Matthew J. C. Crump;Zhiyu Gong;Bruce Milliken

  • On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.

    Juan Lupiáñez;Bruce Milliken;César Solano;Bruce Weaver

  • Endogenous temporal orienting of attention in detection and discrimination tasks.

    Ángel Correa;Juan Lupiáñez;Bruce Milliken;Pío Tudela

  • Inhibition of Return and the Attentional Set for Integrating Versus Differentiating Information

    Juan Lupiáñez;Bruce Milliken

  • The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings

    Matthew J. C. Crump;Bruce Milliken

  • Negative priming in a spatial localization task: feature mismatching and distractor inhibition

    Bruce Milliken;Steven P. Tipper;Bruce Weaver

  • Context-specific learning and control: the roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience.

    Matthew J.C. Crump;Joaquín M.M. Vaquero;Bruce Milliken

  • Attending, ignoring, and repetition: on the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return.

    Bruce Milliken;Steven P. Tipper;George Houghton;Juan Lupiáñez

  • Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations

    Juan Lupiáñez;Caroline Decaix;Caroline Decaix;Eric Siéroff;Sylvie Chokron

  • Identification of disoriented objects: effects of context of prior presentation

    Pierre Jolicoeur;Bruce Milliken

  • Separate mechanisms recruited by exogenous and endogenous spatial cues: evidence from a spatial Stroop paradigm.

    María Jesús Funes;Juan Lupiáñez;Bruce Milliken

  • Inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention: Evidence of location-based and frequency-based inhibition of return

    Todd A. Mondor;Lynn M. Breau;Bruce Milliken

  • Attention and inhibition.

    Bruce Milliken;Steven P. Tipper

  • The manifestation of attentional capture: facilitation or IOR depending on task demands

    Juan Lupiáñez;María Ruz;María Jesús Funes;Bruce Milliken

  • SPATIAL NEGATIVE PRIMING WITHOUT MISMATCHING : COMMENT ON PARK AND KANWISHER (1994)

    Steven P. Tipper;Bruce Weaver;Bruce Milliken

  • Orienting in space and time: joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.

    Bruce Milliken;Juan Lupiáñez;Martha Roberts;Biljana Stevanovski

  • Social categories as a context for the allocation of attentional control.

    Elena Cañadas;Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón;Bruce Milliken;Juan Lupiáñez

  • Negative priming without overt prime selection

    Bruce Milliken;Steve Joordens

  • Automatic and controlled processing in stroop negative priming : The role of attentional set

    Bruce Milliken;Juan Lupianez;Jim Debner;Brent Abello

Frequent Co-Authors

Juan Lupiáñez
Juan Lupiáñez University of Granada
Steven P. Tipper
Steven P. Tipper University of York
David I. Shore
David I. Shore McMaster University
Patrick J. Bennett
Patrick J. Bennett McMaster University
Andrés Catena
Andrés Catena University of Granada
Paolo Bartolomeo
Paolo Bartolomeo Allen Institute for Brain Science
Bruce W. A. Whittlesea
Bruce W. A. Whittlesea Simon Fraser University
Philip M. Merikle
Philip M. Merikle University of Waterloo
Pierre Jolicoeur
Pierre Jolicoeur University of Montreal
Daniel Smilek
Daniel Smilek University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Bruce Milliken

Recently Published Articles