World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
11694
World Ranking
4514
National Ranking
2040

Brenna C. McDonald publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenna C. McDonald sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 226 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Brenna C. McDonald D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenna C. McDonald sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brenna C. McDonald is affiliated with Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on several subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Oncology.

The scientist's work centers around key topics such as cancer-related cognitive impairment studies, dementia and cognitive impairment research, glioma diagnosis and treatment, functional brain connectivity studies, cancer survivorship and care, brain metastases and treatment, as well as advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications.

Recent notable papers by Brenna C. McDonald include:

  • Greater male than female variability in regional brain structure across the lifespan, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • Loneliness and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in older breast cancer survivors and noncancer controls, 2021, Cancer
  • Deficit Accumulation Frailty Trajectories of Older Breast Cancer Survivors and Non-Cancer Controls: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study, 2021, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • Elevated C-Reactive Protein and Subsequent Patient-Reported Cognitive Problems in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study, 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Brain Imaging in Pediatric Cancer Survivors: Correlates of Cognitive Impairment, 2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Andrew J. Saykin
  • James C. Root
  • Wanting Zhai
  • Tim A. Ahles
  • Jeanne S. Mandelblatt

Publishing regularly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Alzheimer's & Dementia, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, UNC Libraries, and Journal of Clinical Oncology, Brenna C. McDonald has contributed extensively to the academic discourse in their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Baseline MRI predictors of conversion from MCI to probable AD in the ADNI cohort.

    Shannon L. Risacher;Andrew J. Saykin;John D. Wes;Li Shen

  • Longitudinal Assessment of Cognitive Changes Associated With Adjuvant Treatment for Breast Cancer: Impact of Age and Cognitive Reserve

    Tim A. Ahles;Andrew J. Saykin;Brenna C. McDonald;Yuelin Li

  • Cognitive function in breast cancer patients prior to adjuvant treatment

    Tim A. Ahles;Tim A. Ahles;Andrew J. Saykin;Andrew J. Saykin;Brenna C. McDonald;Brenna C. McDonald;Charlotte T. Furstenberg

  • Executive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury: neural substrates and treatment strategies.

    Brenna C. McDonald;Laura A. Flashman;Andrew J. Saykin

  • Gray matter reduction associated with systemic chemotherapy for breast cancer: a prospective MRI study.

    Brenna C. McDonald;Susan K. Conroy;Tim A. Ahles;Tim A. Ahles;John D. West

  • Mechanisms of working memory dysfunction after mild and moderate TBI: evidence from functional MRI and neurogenetics.

    Thomas W. McAllister;Laura A. Flashman;Brenna C. McDonald;Andrew J. Saykin

  • Brain Structure and Function Differences in Monozygotic Twins: Possible Effects of Breast Cancer Chemotherapy

    Robert J. Ferguson;Brenna C. McDonald;Andrew J. Saykin;Tim A. Ahles

  • In-Home Virtual Reality Videogame Telerehabilitation in Adolescents With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

    Meredith R. Golomb;Brenna C. McDonald;Stuart J. Warden;Janell Yonkman

  • Longitudinal MRI atrophy biomarkers: Relationship to conversion in the ADNI cohort

    Shannon L. Risacher;Li Shen;John D. West;Sungeun Kim

  • Alterations in Brain Activation During Working Memory Processing Associated With Breast Cancer and Treatment: A Prospective Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Brenna C. McDonald;Susan K. Conroy;Tim A. Ahles;Tim A. Ahles;John D. West

  • Cognitive-behavioral management of chemotherapy-related cognitive change.

    Robert J. Ferguson;Tim A. Ahles;Andrew J. Saykin;Brenna C. McDonald

  • Development of CBT for chemotherapy-related cognitive change: results of a waitlist control trial

    Robert J. Ferguson;Brenna C. McDonald;Michael A. Rocque;Charlotte T. Furstenberg

  • Mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced cognitive disorders: neuropsychological, pathophysiological, and neuroimaging perspectives.

    Andrew J Saykin;Tim A Ahles;Brenna C McDonald

  • Cortical thickness across the lifespan: Data from 17,075 healthy individuals aged 3-90 years

    Sophia Frangou;Amirhossein Modabbernia;Steven C. R. Williams;Efstathios Papachristou

  • Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging of autism spectrum disorders

    Kimberly A. Stigler;Brenna C. McDonald;Amit Anand;Andrew J. Saykin

  • Frontal gray matter reduction after breast cancer chemotherapy and association with executive symptoms: A replication and extension study

    Brenna C. McDonald;Susan K. Conroy;Dori J. Smith;John D. West

  • Altered default mode network connectivity in older adults with cognitive complaints and amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

    Yang Wang;Shannon L Risacher;John D West;Brenna C McDonald

  • Regional brain atrophy in cognitively intact adults with a single APOE ε4 allele

    H. A. Wishart;Andrew Saykin;T. W. McAllister;L. A. Rabin

  • Functional MRI of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): progress and perspectives from the first decade of studies

    Brenna C. McDonald;Brenna C. McDonald;Andrew J. Saykin;Andrew J. Saykin;Thomas W. McAllister

  • Visual contrast sensitivity in Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, and older adults with cognitive complaints

    Shannon L. Risacher;Darrell WuDunn;Susan M. Pepin;Tamiko R. MaGee

  • Cancer-Related Cognitive Outcomes Among Older Breast Cancer Survivors in the Thinking and Living With Cancer Study

    Jeanne S. Mandelblatt;Brent J. Small;Gheorghe Luta;Arti Hurria

  • Cognitive Effects of Cancer and Its Treatments at the Intersection of Aging: What Do We Know; What Do We Need to Know?

    Jeanne S. Mandelblatt;Arti Hurria;Brenna C. McDonald;Andrew J. Saykin

  • Brain activation patterns associated with working memory in relapsing-remitting MS

    Heather A. Wishart;Andrew Saykin;Brenna McDonald;A. C. Mamourian

  • The Cognitive Change Index as a Measure of Self and Informant Perception of Cognitive Decline: Relation to Neuropsychological Tests.

    Chatchawan Rattanabannakit;Shannon L. Risacher;Sujuan Gao;Kathleen A. Lane

  • GWAS of longitudinal amyloid accumulation on 18F-florbetapir PET in Alzheimer's disease implicates microglial activation gene IL1RAP.

    Vijay K Ramanan;Shannon L. Risacher;Kwangsik Nho;Sungeun Kim

  • Association Between Anticholinergic Medication Use and Cognition, Brain Metabolism, and Brain Atrophy in Cognitively Normal Older Adults

    Shannon Leigh Risacher;Brenna C. McDonald;Eileen F. Tallman;John D. West

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew J. Saykin
Andrew J. Saykin Indiana University
Tim A. Ahles
Tim A. Ahles Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Laura A. Flashman
Laura A. Flashman Dartmouth College
Thomas W. McAllister
Thomas W. McAllister Indiana University
Shannon L. Risacher
Shannon L. Risacher Indiana University
Liana G. Apostolova
Liana G. Apostolova Indiana University
Martin R. Farlow
Martin R. Farlow Indiana University
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt Georgetown University
Kwangsik Nho
Kwangsik Nho Indiana University
Brent J. Small
Brent J. Small University of South Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in neuroscience opens the door to various educational and professional pathways. Many students are attracted to accelerated programs online that allow them to earn a bachelor’s degree faster, making it easier to jumpstart a neuroscience career or pivot into neuroscience-related fields.

When choosing a degree, future earning potential is an important factor. Some students specifically look for the best degree in the world to maximize their career opportunities. Neuroscience, along with related majors like biomedical engineering and computer science, is frequently listed among degrees that make the most money.

To help finance their studies, many learners seek online colleges that take financial aid. This makes obtaining a respected neuroscience degree more affordable while still enabling students to pursue high-paying and fulfilling career paths in health, research, or technology.

Best Scientists Citing Brenna C. McDonald

Trending Scientists