World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
6061
World Ranking
12048
National Ranking
213

Roberto Marabini publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Marabini sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 107 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Roberto Marabini D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Marabini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roberto Marabini is affiliated with the Autonomous University of Madrid in Spain. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, alongside Materials Science. Within these, Marabini has contributed notably to subfields such as Structural Biology, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, and Infectious Diseases.

Their work covers a range of scientific topics including:

  • Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions

Roberto Marabini has published multiple papers in several well-known scientific journals. Their frequent publication venues include the Journal of Structural Biology with five publications, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with five preprints, as well as Science Advances, Journal of Visualized Experiments, and IUCrJ.

Recent published papers include:

  • Continuous flexibility analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike prefusion structures, 2020, IUCrJ
  • ScipionTomo: Towards cryo-electron tomography software integration, reproducibility, and validation, 2022, Journal of Structural Biology
  • FSC-Q: a CryoEM map-to-atomic model quality validation based on the local Fourier shell correlation, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Algorithmic robustness to preferred orientations in single particle analysis by CryoEM, 2021, Journal of Structural Biology
  • Advances in Xmipp for Cryo-Electron Microscopy: From Xmipp to Scipion, 2021, Molecules

Collaborations have been an important aspect of Marabini's work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • J.M. Carazo (19 joint works)
  • Carlos Óscar S. Sorzano (18 joint works)
  • Marta Martínez (16 joint works)
  • Pablo Conesa (16 joint works)
  • Erney Ramírez-Aportela (14 joint works)

Best Publications

  • Scipion: A software framework toward integration, reproducibility and validation in 3D electron microscopy.

    J.M. de la Rosa-Trevín;A. Quintana;L. del Cano;A. Zaldívar

  • XMIPP: a new generation of an open-source image processing package for electron microscopy

    Carlos Óscar Sánchez Sorzano;Roberto Marabini;Javier Velázquez-Muriel;José Román Bilbao-Castro

  • Consistent and elastic registration of histological sections using vector-spline regularization

    Ignacio Arganda-Carreras;Carlos O. S. Sorzano;Roberto Marabini;José María Carazo

  • Image processing for electron microscopy single-particle analysis using XMIPP

    Sjors H. W. Scheres;Rafael Núñez-Ramírez;Carlos Óscar Sánchez Sorzano;José M. Carazo

  • Xmipp 3.0: an improved software suite for image processing in electron microscopy.

    J.M. de la Rosa-Trevín;J. Otón;R. Marabini;A. Zaldívar

  • Maximum-likelihood Multi-reference Refinement for Electron Microscopy Images

    Sjors H.W. Scheres;Mikel Valle;Rafael Nuñez;Carlos O.S. Sorzano;Carlos O.S. Sorzano

  • Xmipp: An Image Processing Package for Electron Microscopy

    R. Marabini;I.M. Masegosa;M.C. San Martı́n;S. Marco

  • A clustering approach to multireference alignment of single-particle projections in electron microscopy

    C.O.S. Sorzano;J.R. Bilbao-Castro;Y. Shkolnisky;M. Alcorlo

  • MonoRes: Automatic and Accurate Estimation of Local Resolution for Electron Microscopy Maps

    Jose Luis Vilas;Josué Gómez-Blanco;Pablo Conesa;Roberto Melero

  • 3D reconstruction in electron microscopy using ART with smooth spherically symmetric volume elements (blobs).

    Roberto Marabini;Gabor T Herman;José M Carazo

  • Automatic local resolution-based sharpening of cryo-EM maps.

    Erney Ramírez-Aportela;Jose Luis Vilas;Alisa Glukhova;Roberto Melero

  • Pattern recognition and classification of images of biological macromolecules using artificial neural networks

    R. Marabini;J.M. Carazo

  • The effect of overabundant projection directions on 3D reconstruction algorithms

    C. O. S. Sorzano;Roberto Marabini;Nicolas Boisset;Eicke Rietzel

  • MRC2014: Extensions to the MRC format header for electron cryo-microscopy and tomography.

    Anchi Cheng;Richard Henderson;David Mastronarde;Steven J. Ludtke

  • Three-Dimensional Reconstruction from Reduced Sets of Very Noisy Images Acquired Following a Single-Axis Tilt Schema: Application of a New Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Algorithm and Objective Comparison with Weighted Backprojection

    R. Marabini;E. Rietzel;R. Schroeder;G.T. Herman

  • A pattern matching approach to the automatic selection of particles from low-contrast electron micrographs

    V. Abrishami;A. Zaldívar-Peraza;J. M. de la Rosa-Trevín;J. Vargas

  • Alignment of direct detection device micrographs using a robust Optical Flow approach.

    Vahid Abrishami;Javier Vargas;Xueming Li;Yifan Cheng

  • Automatic particle selection from electron micrographs using machine learning techniques

    C.O.S. Sorzano;E. Recarte;M. Alcorlo;J.R. Bilbao-Castro

  • Image processing and 3-D reconstruction in electron microscopy

    J.-J. Fernandez;C.O.S. Sorzano;R. Marabini;J.-M. Carazo

  • Efficient initial volume determination from electron microscopy images of single particles

    Javier Vargas;Ana-Lucia Álvarez-Cabrera;Roberto Marabini;José María Carazo

  • Characterization of transfer function, resolution and depth of field of a soft X-ray microscope applied to tomography enhancement by Wiener deconvolution.

    Joaquín Otón;Eva Pereiro;Ana J. Pérez-Berná;Laia Millach

Frequent Co-Authors

José María Carazo
José María Carazo Spanish National Research Council
Carlos Oscar S. Sorzano
Carlos Oscar S. Sorzano Spanish National Research Council
José Luis Vilas
José Luis Vilas University of the Basque Country
Gabor T. Herman
Gabor T. Herman City University of New York
María Jesús Martínez
María Jesús Martínez Spanish National Research Council
José L. Carrascosa
José L. Carrascosa Spanish National Research Council
Wah Chiu
Wah Chiu Stanford University
Joachim Frank
Joachim Frank Columbia University
Erik Lindahl
Erik Lindahl Stockholm University
Ana Maria Cuervo
Ana Maria Cuervo Albert Einstein College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science opens doors to a wide range of related fields and interdisciplinary career paths. Many students also look into engineering and data-driven disciplines, often choosing online degrees for convenience and flexibility. Cost is a significant concern, and programs such as the mechanical engineering cost of education are key to understanding tuition and associated expenses.

For those interested in foundational sciences, pursuing an online physics degree can complement computer science knowledge, especially in research or computational modeling roles.

The rise of big data and artificial intelligence has made the data science learning path increasingly popular among computer science graduates looking to specialize further.

Additionally, technology-driven industries often require expertise in areas such as electrical engineering. Reviewing electrical engineering degree online admissions requirements is a great first step for those considering this route.

Ultimately, online education offers numerous affordable and accessible options, making it easier than ever to expand your skills and career opportunities in related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Roberto Marabini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles