World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 30 11271 10541 5889 5371 50 8098

Beth L. Goodlin-Jones publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Beth L. Goodlin-Jones between 1988 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Beth L. Goodlin-Jones published across 29 years, from 1988 to 2016, averaging 1.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2008. 1 of the 50 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2008. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication
1988 2016

50 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Beth L. Goodlin-Jones: publications per year, 1988 to 2016
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 4
1998 3
1999 0
2000 0
2001 3
2002 4
2003 1
2004 5
2005 2
2006 2
2007 6
2008 7
2009 4
2010 2
2011 2
2012 1
2013 0
2014 1
2015 0
2016 1
Total 50
Download as CSV

Beth L. Goodlin-Jones publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beth L. Goodlin-Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 41–50 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 50 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52 50
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Beth L. Goodlin-Jones D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beth L. Goodlin-Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398 30
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Beth L. Goodlin-Jones is affiliated with the University of California, Davis, located in the United States. The scientific profile provided reflects a focus on academic contributions within this institutional context.

There is no available data on recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, main research topics, or awards related to this scientist. Consequently, specific insights into their scientific output, collaborative networks, and areas of specialization cannot be detailed.

The lack of listed publications or research topics suggests either limited publicly accessible bibliographic records or a focus on work that has not been indexed in the referenced databases. The profile indicates that Beth L. Goodlin-Jones has an active professional status and is not deceased.

Given the association with a major research university, it is reasonable to infer a role engaged in research and possibly academic instruction, although specific details on their research areas or scholarly impact are unavailable.

Best Publications

  • The Amygdala Is Enlarged in Children But Not Adolescents with Autism; the Hippocampus Is Enlarged at All Ages

    Cynthia Mills Schumann;Julia Hamstra;Beth L. Goodlin-Jones;Linda J. Lotspeich

  • Evidence-based assessment of autism spectrum disorders in children and adolescents

    Sally Ozonoff;Beth L. Goodlin-Jones;Marjorie Solomon

  • Sleep problems in children with autism spectrum disorders, developmental delays, and typical development: a population-based study

    Paula Krakowiak;Beth L Goodlin-Jones;Irva Hertz-Picciotto;Lisa A. Croen

  • A Social Adjustment Enhancement Intervention for High Functioning Autism, Asperger's Syndrome, and Pervasive Developmental Disorder NOS.

    Marjorie Solomon;Beth L. Goodlin-Jones;Thomas F. Anders

  • Autism profiles of males with fragile X syndrome.

    Susan W. Harris;David R Hessl;Beth Goodlin-Jones;Jessica A Ferranti

  • The Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire in toddlers and preschool children.

    Beth L. Goodlin-Jones;Stephanie L. Sitnick;Karen Tang;Jingyi Liu

  • Nighttime sleep-wake patterns and self-soothing from birth to one year of age: a longitudinal intervention study.

    Melissa M. Burnham;Beth L. Goodlin-Jones;Erika E. Gaylor;Thomas F. Anders

  • The effectiveness of parent-child interaction therapy for families of children on the autism spectrum.

    Marjorie Solomon;Michele Ono;Susan Timmer;Beth Goodlin-Jones

  • Night Waking, Sleep-Wake Organization, and Self-Soothing in the First Year of Life

    Beth L. Goodlin-Jones;Melissa M. Burnham;Erika E. Gaylor;Thomas F. Anders

  • The Efficacy of Melatonin for Sleep Problems in Children with Autism, Fragile X Syndrome, or Autism and Fragile X Syndrome

    Juthamas Wirojanan;Juthamas Wirojanan;Sebastien Jacquemont;Sebastien Jacquemont;Rafael Diaz;Rafael Diaz;Susan Bacalman

  • Sleep patterns of children with pervasive developmental disorders.

    Ryan D. Honomichl;Beth L. Goodlin-Jones;Melissa Burnham;Erika Gaylor

  • The use of actigraphy to study sleep disorders in preschoolers: some concerns about detection of nighttime awakenings.

    Stephanie L. Sitnick;Beth L. Goodlin-Jones;Thomas F. Anders

  • Investigation of Neuroanatomical Differences Between Autism and Asperger Syndrome

    Linda J. Lotspeich;Hower Kwon;Cynthia Schumann;Susanna L. Fryer

  • Sleep Patterns in Preschool-Age Children With Autism, Developmental Delay, and Typical Development

    Beth L. Goodlin-Jones;Karen Tang;Jingyi Liu;Thomas F. Anders

  • Psychiatric phenotype of the fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) in males: newly described fronto-subcortical dementia.

    Susan Bacalman;Faraz Farzin;James A. Bourgeois;Jennifer Cogswell

  • Child sexual abuse and adult revictimization with women of color.

    Anthony J. Urquiza;Beth L. Goodlin-Jones

  • The Prader-Willi phenotype of fragile X syndrome.

    Stephen T. Nowicki;Flora Tassone;Michele Y. Ono;Jessica A Ferranti

  • Autistic Spectrum Disorder and the fragile X premutation

    Beth L. Goodlin-Jones;Flora Tassone;Louise W. Gane;Randi J. Hagerman

  • A comprehensive volumetric analysis of the cerebellum in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.

    Julia A. Scott;Cynthia Mills Schumann;Beth L. Goodlin-Jones;David G. Amaral

  • A comparison of the sleep-wake patterns of cosleeping and solitary-sleeping infants.

    Amy Mao;Melissa M. Burnham;Beth L. Goodlin-Jones;Erika E. Gaylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas F. Anders
Thomas F. Anders Brown University
Randi J Hagerman
Randi J Hagerman University of California, Davis
David G. Amaral
David G. Amaral University of California, Davis
Flora Tassone
Flora Tassone University of California, Davis
Ana-Maria Iosif
Ana-Maria Iosif University of California, Davis
Cynthia M. Schumann
Cynthia M. Schumann University of California, Davis
David R Hessl
David R Hessl University of California, Davis
Marjorie Solomon
Marjorie Solomon University of California, Davis
Allan L. Reiss
Allan L. Reiss Stanford University
Robin L Hansen
Robin L Hansen University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to diverse online degrees and fulfilling career pathways, especially in counseling and mental health services. Many aspiring professionals explore roles such as substance abuse counselors, mental health counselors, and behavioral therapists. Accreditation, licensing, and practical experience are crucial components for those seeking to make an impact in this field.

Requirements to become a substance abuse counselor can vary significantly across cities and states. For instance, those interested in the Sacramento substance abuse counselors education requirements will need to meet specific academic and training criteria, while the Saint Paul substance abuse counselors education requirements outline a different set of standards.

For individuals considering a move or online study, it's also important to review the substance abuse counselor requirements in San Antonio as well as the San Diego substance abuse counselors education requirements. Each location may feature unique licensure exams, educational prerequisites, and supervised practice hours. Researching these pathways carefully can help you choose the right program and location for your career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Beth L. Goodlin-Jones