World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
29033
World Ranking
3593
National Ranking
310

Beate Winner publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beate Winner sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 172 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Beate Winner D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beate Winner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Beate Winner is affiliated with the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Medicine, and Neuroscience. Their work notably focuses on subfields such as Molecular Biology, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, and Biomedical Engineering.

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Among recent publications associated with or relevant to Beate Winner's research environment and collaborations are:

  • Organoids in gastrointestinal diseases: from experimental models to clinical translation, 2022, Gut
  • The Gut-Brain Axis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Current and Future Perspectives, 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Recombinant pro-CTSD (cathepsin D) enhances SNCA/α-Synuclein degradation in α-Synucleinopathy models, 2022, Autophagy
  • An alternative splicing modulator decreases mutant HTT and improves the molecular fingerprint in Huntington's disease patient neurons, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Primary cilia and SHH signaling impairments in human and mouse models of Parkinson's disease, 2022, Nature Communications

Frequent coauthors who often collaborate with Beate Winner include Jürgen Winkler, Martin Regensburger, Florian Krach, Iryna Prots, and Claudia Günther.

Their publications are frequently found in the following scientific journals and venues:

  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • npj Parkinson's Disease
  • Human Molecular Genetics

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration.

    Christopher K. Glass;Kaoru Saijo;Beate Winner;Maria Carolina Marchetto

  • In vivo demonstration that alpha-synuclein oligomers are toxic.

    Beate Winner;Roberto Jappelli;Samir K. Maji;Paula A. Desplats

  • Doublecortin expression levels in adult brain reflect neurogenesis.

    Sebastien Couillard-Despres;Beate Winner;Susanne Schaubeck;Robert Aigner

  • A Nurr1/CoREST Pathway in Microglia and Astrocytes Protects Dopaminergic Neurons from Inflammation-Induced Death

    Kaoru Saijo;Beate Winner;Christian T. Carson;Jana G. Collier

  • Long‐term survival and cell death of newly generated neurons in the adult rat olfactory bulb

    Beate Winner;Christiana M. Cooper-Kuhn;Robert Aigner;Jürgen Winkler;Jürgen Winkler

  • Neurodegenerative disease and adult neurogenesis

    Beate Winner;Zacharias Kohl;Fred H. Gage

  • The Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS): A reliable and valid measure of disease severity

    R. Schüle;T. Holland-Letz;S. Klimpe;J. Kassubek

  • Adult Neurogenesis in Neurodegenerative Diseases

    Beate Winner;Jürgen Winkler

  • Th17 Lymphocytes Induce Neuronal Cell Death in a Human iPSC-Based Model of Parkinson's Disease.

    Annika Sommer;Franz Marxreiter;Florian Krach;Tanja Fadler

  • Accumulation of oligomer-prone α-synuclein exacerbates synaptic and neuronal degeneration in vivo.

    Edward Rockenstein;Silke Nuber;Cassia R. Overk;Kiren Ubhi

  • Gene Expression Profiling of Neural Stem Cells and Their Neuronal Progeny Reveals IGF2 as a Regulator of Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis

    Oliver Bracko;Tatjana Singer;Stefan Aigner;Marlen Knobloch

  • Adult neurogenesis and neurite outgrowth are impaired in LRRK2 G2019S mice

    B Winner;HL Melrose;C Zhao;KM Hinkle

  • α-Synuclein oligomers induce early axonal dysfunction in human iPSC-based models of synucleinopathies

    Iryna Prots;Janina Grosch;Razvan-Marius Brazdis;Katrin Simmnacher

  • Neurodegeneration and Motor Dysfunction in a Conditional Model of Parkinson's Disease

    Silke Nuber;Elisabeth Petrasch-Parwez;Beate Winner;Jürgen Winkler

  • Transforming growth factor-beta1 is a negative modulator of adult neurogenesis.

    Frank-Peter Wachs;Beate Winner;Beate Winner;Sebastien Couillard-Despres;Sebastien Couillard-Despres;Thorsten Schiller;Thorsten Schiller

  • LRRK2 knockout mice have an intact dopaminergic system but display alterations in exploratory and motor co-ordination behaviors

    Kelly M. Hinkle;Mei Yue;Bahareh Behrouz;Justus C. Dächsel

  • Human Wild-Type α-Synuclein Impairs Neurogenesis

    Beate Winner;D. Chichung Lie;Edward Rockenstein;Robert Aigner

  • Striatal deafferentation increases dopaminergic neurogenesis in the adult olfactory bulb.

    Beate Winner;Martin Geyer;Sebastien Couillard-Despres;Robert Aigner

  • Pluripotent stem cells in neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental diseases

    Maria C.N. Marchetto;Beate Winner;Fred H. Gage

Frequent Co-Authors

Jürgen Winkler
Jürgen Winkler University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Ulrich Bogdahn
Ulrich Bogdahn University of Regensburg
Ludwig Aigner
Ludwig Aigner Paracelsus Medical University
Eliezer Masliah
Eliezer Masliah National Institutes of Health
Fred H. Gage
Fred H. Gage Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Sebastien Couillard-Despres
Sebastien Couillard-Despres Paracelsus Medical University
Olaf Riess
Olaf Riess University of Tübingen
Edward Rockenstein
Edward Rockenstein University of California, San Diego
Rebecca Schüle
Rebecca Schüle University of Tübingen
André Reis
André Reis University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Beate Winner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles