World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antonio Salvetti

Antonio Salvetti

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 75 19066 766 475 23080

Antonio Salvetti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Antonio Salvetti between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Antonio Salvetti published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2004. 4 of the 482 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2004. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 15 publications 1988: 12 publications 1989: 17 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 19 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 19 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 19 publications 1998: 25 publications 1999: 22 publications 2000: 23 publications 2001: 23 publications 2002: 20 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 31 publications 2005: 28 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 4 publications
1973 2025

482 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Antonio Salvetti: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 0
1976 3
1977 2
1978 3
1979 1
1980 3
1981 2
1982 7
1983 4
1984 2
1985 8
1986 10
1987 15
1988 12
1989 17
1990 12
1991 19
1992 9
1993 19
1994 9
1995 13
1996 12
1997 19
1998 25
1999 22
2000 23
2001 23
2002 20
2003 18
2004 31
2005 28
2006 19
2007 25
2008 26
2009 7
2010 4
2011 2
2012 1
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 4
Total 482
Download as CSV

Antonio Salvetti publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Salvetti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 475 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 475
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Antonio Salvetti D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Salvetti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574 75
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Antonio Salvetti was affiliated with the University of Pisa in Italy. Their research spanned multiple fields primarily centered on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. The focus extended to various subfields, including genetics, cancer research, oncology, orthopedics and sports medicine, and molecular biology.

The research topics covered by Salvetti included:

  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Cancer genomics and diagnostics
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Bone health and treatments
  • Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Bone metabolism and diseases

Antonio Salvetti published work in several scientific venues. Notably, their recent papers appeared in:

  • Cancer Treatment Reviews
  • Tumori Journal

Two recent papers exemplify the themes addressed in Salvetti's work:

  • PREDICTIVE BRCA GENETIC TESTING IN ITALIAN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER: A POSITION PAPER OF ITALIAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES, published in 2025 in Cancer Treatment Reviews
  • The use of bone-modifying agents in early breast cancer: AIOM Guidelines update and perspectives, published in 2025 in Tumori Journal

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Salvetti included Laura Cortesi, Luca Arecco, Daniela Bernardi, L. Biganzoli, and Lucia Del Mastro. Each of these collaborators worked with them on at least two publications.

Best Publications

  • Endothelial function and dysfunction. Part II: Association with cardiovascular risk factors and diseases. A statement by the Working Group on Endothelins and Endothelial Factors of the European Society of Hypertension

    Hanspeter Brunner;John R Cockcroft;John E Deanfield;Ann Donald

  • Vitamin C Improves Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation by Restoring Nitric Oxide Activity in Essential Hypertension

    Stefano Taddei;Agostino Virdis;Lorenzo Ghiadoni;Armando Magagna

  • Aging and endothelial function in normotensive subjects and patients with essential hypertension.

    Stefano Taddei;Agostino Virdis;Paola Mattei;Lorenzo Ghiadoni

  • Endothelial function and dysfunction. Part I: Methodological issues for assessment in the different vascular beds: A statement by the working group on endothelin and endothelial factors of the European society of hypertension

    John E Deanfield;Ann Donald;Claudio Ferri;Cristina Giannattasio

  • Ambulatory Blood Pressure Is Superior to Clinic Blood Pressure in Predicting Treatment-Induced Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

    Giuseppe Mancia;Alberto Zanchetti;Enrico Agebiti-Rosei;Giuseppe Benemio

  • Age-Related Reduction of NO Availability and Oxidative Stress in Humans

    Stefano Taddei;Agostino Virdis;Lorenzo Ghiadoni;Guido Salvetti

  • Vasodilation to acetylcholine in primary and secondary forms of human hypertension.

    Stefano Taddei;Agostino Virdis;P Mattei;Antonio Salvetti

  • Renal Function and Intensive Lowering of Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Participants of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) Study

    Luis M. Ruilope;Antonio Salvetti;Kenneth Jamerson;Lennart Hansson

  • Impaired Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilatation in Subclinical Hypothyroidism: Beneficial Effect of Levothyroxine Therapy

    Stefano Taddei;Nadia Caraccio;Agostino Virdis;Angela Dardano

  • Menopause Is Associated With Endothelial Dysfunction in Women

    Stefano Taddei;Agostino Virdis;Lorenzo Ghiadoni;Paola Mattei

  • Physical activity prevents age-related impairment in nitric oxide availability in elderly athletes.

    Stefano Taddei;Fabio Galetta;Agostino Virdis;Lorenzo Ghiadoni

  • Different Effect of Antihypertensive Drugs on Conduit Artery Endothelial Function

    Lorenzo Ghiadoni;Armando Magagna;Daniele Versari;Isabella Kardasz

  • Defective l-Arginine–Nitric Oxide Pathway in Offspring of Essential Hypertensive Patients

    Stefano Taddei;Agostino Virdis;Paola Mattei;Lorenzo Ghiadoni

  • Hypertension Causes Premature Aging of Endothelial Function in Humans

    Stefano Taddei;Agostino Virdis;Paola Mattei;Lorenzo Ghiadoni

  • Endothelial Function and Common Carotid Artery Wall Thickening in Patients With Essential Hypertension

    L. Ghiadoni;S. Taddei;A. Virdis;I. Sudano

  • Supplementation With Vitamins C and E Improves Arterial Stiffness and Endothelial Function in Essential Hypertensive Patients

    Yvonne Plantinga;Lorenzo Ghiadoni;Armando Magagna;Chiara Giannarelli

  • Cyclooxygenase Inhibition Restores Nitric Oxide Activity in Essential Hypertension

    Stefano Taddei;Agostino Virdis;Lorenzo Ghiadoni;Armando Magagna

  • Effect of Insulin on Acetylcholine-Induced Vasodilation in Normotensive Subjects and Patients With Essential Hypertension

    Stefano Taddei;Agostino Virdis;P Mattei;Andrea Natali

  • Unexpected cardiotoxicity in haematological bortezomib treated patients.

    Enrico Orciuolo;Gabriele Buda;Nadia Cecconi;Sara Galimberti

  • Effect of the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blocker Candesartan on Endothelial Function in Patients With Essential Hypertension

    Lorenzo Ghiadoni;Agostino Virdis;Armando Magagna;Stefano Taddei

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefano Taddei
Stefano Taddei University of Pisa
Lorenzo Ghiadoni
Lorenzo Ghiadoni University of Pisa
Agostino Virdis
Agostino Virdis University of Pisa
Eugenio Picano
Eugenio Picano National Research Council (CNR)
Giuseppe Mancia
Giuseppe Mancia University of Milano-Bicocca
Achille C. Pessina
Achille C. Pessina University of Padua
Antonio L'Abbate
Antonio L'Abbate Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Gian Paolo Rossi
Gian Paolo Rossi University of Padua
Paolo Miccoli
Paolo Miccoli University of Pisa
Bruno Trimarco
Bruno Trimarco University of Naples Federico II

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees is a smart way to open additional career pathways in the medical and healthcare fields. Many students are now choosing flexible, affordable online programs that allow them to balance studies with existing commitments.

For those pursuing advanced nursing roles, the cheapest dnp online program options help minimize debt while positioning graduates for leadership positions in healthcare. Registered nurses looking to upgrade their credentials can consider the cheapest bsn programs, which offer accessible pathways to a Bachelor of Science in Nursing online.

If you have a non-nursing background but want to enter the field, innovative online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses provide a fast track into advanced practice roles. Meanwhile, prospective students looking for entry-level nursing credentials can explore adn nursing programs that tend to have more accessible admissions processes.

These diverse online options make it easier than ever to find a program that aligns with your goals, budget, and educational background—helping you take the next step in your medical or healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Salvetti

Recently Published Articles