World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
9064
World Ranking
5972
National Ranking
2614

Anthony N. Moore publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony N. Moore sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 99 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Anthony N. Moore D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony N. Moore sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony N. Moore is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, with a primary focus on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these broad fields, their work frequently engages with molecular biology, neurology, and epidemiology, alongside studies in endocrine and autonomic systems as well as pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The scientist's research topics concentrate on areas such as traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, mitochondrial function and pathology, as well as traumatic brain injury research. Additional focal points include the neuroscience of respiration and sleep, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, ATP synthase and ATPases research, and epigenetics and DNA methylation.

Moore has published in several scientific journals, with notable frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Scientific Reports
  • Neurotrauma Reports
  • Journal of Neuroinflammation
  • Neurochemistry International

Some of the recent papers associated with this scientist include:

  • A method for assessing tissue respiration in anatomically defined brain regions, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Enhanced presynaptic mitochondrial energy production is required for memory formation, 2023, Scientific Reports
  • Epigenetic Modifications and Their Potential Contribution to Traumatic Brain Injury Pathobiology and Outcome, 2022, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Lysophospholipids Are Associated With Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, 2023, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Caudal DMN neurons innervate the spleen and release CART peptide to regulate neuroimmune function, 2023, Journal of Neuroinflammation

Frequently collaborating researchers include John B. Redell, Pramod K. Dash, Kimberly N. Hood, Nobuhide Kobori, and Erica L. Underwood. These coauthors have contributed multiple publications alongside Moore, highlighting ongoing partnerships in research activities.

Best Publications

  • A Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascade in the CA1/CA2 Subfield of the Dorsal Hippocampus Is Essential for Long-Term Spatial Memory

    Sonja Blum;Anthony N. Moore;Frank Adams;Pramod K. Dash

  • Enhanced neurogenesis in the rodent hippocampus following traumatic brain injury.

    P.K. Dash;S.A. Mach;A.N. Moore

  • Enhancing Expression of Nrf2-Driven Genes Protects the Blood–Brain Barrier after Brain Injury

    Jing Zhao;Anthony N. Moore;John B. Redell;Pramod K. Dash

  • Human traumatic brain injury alters plasma microRNA levels.

    John B. Redell;Anthony N. Moore;Norman H. Ward;Georgene W. Hergenroeder

  • A role for prefrontal cortex in memory storage for trace fear conditioning.

    Jason D. Runyan;Anthony N. Moore;Pramod K. Dash

  • Biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of mild traumatic brain injury/concussion.

    Cameron B. Jeter;Georgene W. Hergenroeder;Michael J. Hylin;John B. Redell

  • Biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis, and evaluation of treatment efficacy for traumatic brain injury

    Pramod K. Dash;Jing Zhao;Georgene Hergenroeder;Anthony N. Moore

  • Valproate administered after traumatic brain injury provides neuroprotection and improves cognitive function in rats.

    Pramod K. Dash;Sara A. Orsi;Min Zhang;Raymond J. Grill

  • Sulforaphane enhances aquaporin-4 expression and decreases cerebral edema following traumatic brain injury.

    Jing Zhao;Anthony N. Moore;Guy L. Clifton;Pramod K. Dash

  • Spatial Memory Formation and Memory-Enhancing Effect of Glucose Involves Activation of the Tuberous Sclerosis Complex–Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway

    Pramod K. Dash;Sara A. Orsi;Anthony N. Moore

  • High-density microarray analysis of hippocampal gene expression following experimental brain injury.

    David A. Matzilevich;Jason M. Rall;Anthony N. Moore;Raymond J. Grill

  • Sulforaphane improves cognitive function administered following traumatic brain injury

    Pramod K. Dash;Jing Zhao;Sara A. Orsi;Min Zhang

  • Disruption of the perineuronal net in the hippocampus or medial prefrontal cortex impairs fear conditioning

    Michael J. Hylin;Sara A. Orsi;Anthony N. Moore;Pramod K. Dash

  • Histone deactylase inhibition combined with behavioral therapy enhances learning and memory following traumatic brain injury

    Pramod K. Dash;Sara A. Orsi;Anthony N. Moore

  • Biomarkers in the clinical diagnosis and management of traumatic brain injury

    Georgene W. Hergenroeder;John B. Redell;Anthony N. Moore;Pramod K. Dash

  • Serum IL-6: a candidate biomarker for intracranial pressure elevation following isolated traumatic brain injury

    Georgene W Hergenroeder;Anthony N Moore;J Philip McCoy;Leigh Samsel

  • Regional expression and role of cyclooxygenase-2 following experimental traumatic brain injury.

    Pramod K. Dash;Sara A. Mach;Anthony N. Moore

  • Requirement for DARPP-32 in Progesterone-Facilitated Sexual Receptivity in Female Rats and Mice

    S. K. Mani;A. A. Fienberg;J. P. O'Callaghan;G. L. Snyder

  • Neuronal activity increases the phosphorylation of the transcription factor cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) in rat hippocampus and cortex

    Anthony N. Moore;M N Waxham;Pramod Dash

  • Altered Mitochondrial Dynamics and TBI Pathophysiology.

    Tara D. Fischer;Michael J. Hylin;Jing Zhao;Anthony N. Moore

  • Spatial memory deficits, increased phosphorylation of the transcription factor CREB, and induction of the AP-1 complex following experimental brain injury

    PK Dash;AN Moore;CE Dixon

Frequent Co-Authors

Pramod K. Dash
Pramod K. Dash The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Michael J. Gambello
Michael J. Gambello Emory University
Satish K. Pillai
Satish K. Pillai Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Baha M. Sibai
Baha M. Sibai The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
M. Neal Waxham
M. Neal Waxham The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Henry W. Strobel
Henry W. Strobel The University of Texas at Austin
Ronald L. Hayes
Ronald L. Hayes The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Lu Lu
Lu Lu University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Elissa J. Chesler
Elissa J. Chesler University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Robert W. Williams
Robert W. Williams University of Tennessee Health Science Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Anthony N. Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles