World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
16586
World Ranking
5801
National Ranking
596

Ann Hackmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Hackmann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ann Hackmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Hackmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ann Hackmann was affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their academic career was tied to this institution, where they contributed to the research community during their tenure.

Data regarding Hackmann's research work shows no recorded papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues. There is also no information available about specific fields or subfields of study they pursued, nor main topics addressed in their work.

There are no documented book publications or awards attributed to Hackmann. This lack of recorded output or recognitions in the provided data suggests limited publicly available information on their scholarly contributions.

The absence of detailed information on Hackmann's research topics, collaborators, and venues indicates that either records are incomplete or their academic profile was not extensively documented in the analyzed sources.

Best Publications

  • Cognitive therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: development and evaluation.

    Anke Ehlers;David M. Clark;Ann Hackmann;Freda McManus

  • A comparison of cognitive therapy, applied relaxation and imipramine in the treatment of panic disorder.

    David M. Clark;Paul M. Salkovskis;Ann Hackmann;Hugh Middleton

  • Social Phobia: The Role of In-Situation Safety Behaviors in Maintaining Anxiety and Negative Beliefs

    Adrian Wells;David M. Clark;Paul Salkovskis;John Ludgate

  • Intrusive re-experiencing in post-traumatic stress disorder: phenomenology, theory, and therapy.

    Anke Ehlers;Ann Hackmann;Tanja Michael

  • Cognitive therapy versus exposure and applied relaxation in social phobia: A randomized controlled trial.

    David M. Clark;Anke Ehlers;Ann Hackmann;Freda McManus

  • Cognitive therapy versus fluoxetine in generalized social phobia: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

    David M. Clark;Anke Ehlers;Freda McManus;Ann Hackmann

  • A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cognitive Therapy, a Self-help Booklet, and Repeated Assessments as Early Interventions for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

    Anke Ehlers;David M. Clark;Ann Hackmann;Freda McManus

  • Recurrent images and early memories in social phobia

    Ann Hackmann;David M. Clark;Freda McManus

  • Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

    Michael Sharpe;Keith Hawton;Sue Simkin;Christina Surawy

  • Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Preventing Relapse in Recurrent Depression: A Randomized Dismantling Trial

    J. Mark G. Williams;Catherine Crane;Thorsten Barnhofer;Kate Brennan

  • Characteristics and content of intrusive memories in PTSD and their changes with treatment

    Ann Hackmann;Anke Ehlers;Anne Speckens;David M. Clark

  • An experimental investigation of the role of safety-seeking behaviours in the maintenance of panic disorder with agoraphobia

    Paul M. Salkovskis;David M. Clark;Ann Hackmann;Adrian Wells

  • The nature of intrusive memories after trauma: the warning signal hypothesis.

    Anke Ehlers;Ann Hackmann;Regina Steil;Sue Clohessy

  • SEEING YOURSELF THROUGH OTHERS’ EYES: A STUDY OF SPONTANEOUSLY OCCURRING IMAGES IN SOCIAL PHOBIA

    Ann Hackmann;Christina Surawy;David M. Clark

  • Community based cognitive therapy in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder following the Omagh bomb

    Kate Gillespie;Michael Duffy;Ann Hackmann;David M Clark

  • Brief cognitive therapy for panic disorder: a randomized controlled trial.

    David M. Clark;Paul M. Salkovskis;Ann Hackmann;Adrian Wells

  • A Randomized Controlled Trial of 7-Day Intensive and Standard Weekly Cognitive Therapy for PTSD and Emotion-Focused Supportive Therapy

    Anke Ehlers;Ann Hackmann;Nick Grey;Jennifer Wild

  • Two psychological treatments for hypochondriasis. A randomised controlled trial.

    D M Clark;P M Salkovskis;A Hackmann;A Wells

  • Rescripting Early Memories Linked to Negative Images in Social Phobia: A Pilot Study

    Jennifer Wild;Ann Hackmann;David M. Clark

  • Imagery rescripting as a brief stand-alone treatment for depressed patients with intrusive memories.

    Chris R. Brewin;Jon Wheatley;Trishna Patel;Pasco Fearon

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Clark
David M. Clark University of Oxford
Paul M. Salkovskis
Paul M. Salkovskis University of Oxford
Anke Ehlers
Anke Ehlers University of Oxford
Adrian Wells
Adrian Wells University of Manchester
Freda McManus
Freda McManus Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
Jennifer Wild
Jennifer Wild University of Oxford
Nick Grey
Nick Grey Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Chris R. Brewin
Chris R. Brewin University College London
Thorsten Barnhofer
Thorsten Barnhofer University of Surrey
J. Mark G. Williams
J. Mark G. Williams University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens up diverse online degrees and a variety of rewarding career options in the USA. For instance, those interested in optimizing workplace environments may consider organizational psychologist careers, which focus on improving employee satisfaction and productivity within companies.

There are many advantages of being a psychologist, including the ability to positively impact individuals’ lives, access flexible work settings, and work in ever-evolving fields such as clinical practice, counseling, and research. However, it's important to weigh these benefits against challenges like emotional demands and licensing requirements.

The future outlook of a psychologist remains positive, with steady demand driven by increased awareness of mental health and the need for psychological services in schools, healthcare, and business sectors.

For those interested in assessment and measurement, a promising niche is psychometrics. Learning what does a psychometrician do reveals career pathways in data analysis, test development, and educational consulting.

Online psychology degrees offer flexibility and equip you with essential knowledge for these dynamic, growing professions.

Best Scientists Citing Ann Hackmann

Recently Published Articles