World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrejs Schütz

Andrejs Schütz

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
55
Citations
8621
World Ranking
3921
National Ranking
71

Andrejs Schütz publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrejs Schütz sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 104 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Andrejs Schütz D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrejs Schütz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Low level exposure to cadmium and early kidney damage: the OSCAR study

    Lars Järup;Lennart Hellström;Tobias Alfvén;Margareta D Carlsson

  • Low-level cadmium exposure and osteoporosis.

    Tobias Alfvén;Carl-Gustaf Elinder;Margareta Dea Carlsson;Anders Grubb

  • Longitudinal study of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in blood and urine of pregnant and lactating women, as well as in umbilical cord blood.

    Marie Vahter;Agneta Åkesson;Birger Lind;Ulla Björs

  • Cadmium exposure in pregnancy and lactation in relation to iron status

    Agneta Akesson;Marika Berglund;Andrejs SCHüTZ;Per Bjellerup

  • Measurement by ICP-MS of lead in plasma and whole blood of lead workers and controls.

    A Schütz;I A Bergdahl;A Ekholm;S Skerfving

  • Fish consumption and exposure to persistent organochlorine compounds, mercury, selenium and methylamines among Swedish fishermen

    B-G Svensson;A Nilsson;E Jonsson;Andrejs Schütz

  • Kinetics of lead in bone and blood after end of occupational exposure.

    U. Nilsson;R. Attewell;J.-O. Christoffersson;A. Schütz

  • Total and Inorganic Mercury in Breast Milk and Blood in Relation to Fish Consumption and Amalgam Fillings in Lactating Women

    Unknown

  • Fish as a source of exposure to mercury and selenium.

    B.-G. Svensson;A. Schütz;A. Nilsson;I. Åkesson

  • Trace element levels in whole blood and serum from Swedish adolescents.

    Ebba Bárány;Ingvar A. Bergdahl;Lars-Eric Bratteby;Thomas Lundh

  • Long-term Use of Nicotine Chewing Gum and Mercury Exposure from Dental Amalgam Fillings

    Unknown

  • Mercury, selenium, and glutathione peroxidase before and after amalgam removal in man

    Margareta Molin;Bo Bergman;Stefan L. Marklund;Andrejs Schütz

  • Status of mercury and selenium in dental personnel: impact of amalgam work and own fillings.

    Ingrid Akesson;Andrejs Schutz;Robyn Attewell;Staffan Skerfving

  • Mercury in Biological Fluids after Amalgam Removal

    G. Sandborgh-Englund;C.-G. Elinder;S. Langworth;A. Schütz

  • Cadmium, mercury, and lead in kidney cortex of the general Swedish population: a study of biopsies from living kidney donors.

    Unknown

  • Lead concentrations in human plasma, urine and whole blood.

    Ingvar A Bergdahl;Andrejs Schütz;L Gerhardsson;A Jensen

  • Lead in finger-bone analysed in vivo in active and retired lead workers.

    J. O. Christoffersson;A. Schütz;L. Ahlgren;B. Haeger‐Aronsen

  • Endocrine function in mercury exposed chloralkali workers.

    Unknown

  • Interactions between essential and toxic elements in lead exposed children in Katowice, Poland

    Katarina Osman;Andrejs Schütz;Björn Åkesson;Anna Maciag

  • Relationships between trace element concentrations in human blood and serum.

    Ebba Bárány;Ingvar A. Bergdahl;Lars-Eric Bratteby;Thomas Lundh

Frequent Co-Authors

Staffan Skerfving
Staffan Skerfving Lund University
Marie Vahter
Marie Vahter Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths that blend science, technology, and policy. For students interested in spatial data and environmental mapping, exploring the colleges with GIS programs can be a great way to gain specialized skills in Geographic Information Systems. These programs complement environmental science by focusing on geospatial analysis, an essential tool in environmental management.

For those leaning toward leadership and policy in environmental sectors, a Master of Public Administration (MPA) is invaluable. Accelerated options like 1 year MPA programs provide a fast track to roles in government and non-profits where environmental policy and resource management are key.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is also crucial. Pursuing a sociology bachelor degree online can deepen insights into human behavior and social systems, enhancing the ability to design effective environmental interventions.

Finally, for professionals seeking advanced research credentials without extensive time commitments, options like 1 year PhD programs online no dissertation offer innovative pathways to earn a doctorate. Such degrees can elevate careers in academia, consultancy, or specialized policy roles.

Best Scientists Citing Andrejs Schütz

Recently Published Articles