World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alison E. Ashcroft

Alison E. Ashcroft

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 54 12833 11547 721 638 185 8234

Alison E. Ashcroft publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alison E. Ashcroft between 1981 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alison E. Ashcroft published across 44 years, from 1981 to 2024, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2013. 1 of the 194 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2013. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1981 2024

194 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alison E. Ashcroft: publications per year, 1981 to 2024
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 2
1985 1
1986 0
1987 4
1988 1
1989 2
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 3
1995 1
1996 2
1997 9
1998 1
1999 1
2000 4
2001 0
2002 8
2003 6
2004 5
2005 7
2006 9
2007 8
2008 9
2009 4
2010 10
2011 9
2012 9
2013 21
2014 10
2015 11
2016 7
2017 11
2018 4
2019 4
2020 4
2021 3
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 194
Download as CSV

Alison E. Ashcroft publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison E. Ashcroft sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 185 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344 185
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Alison E. Ashcroft D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison E. Ashcroft sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933 54
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alison E. Ashcroft is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, as well as chemistry. They have contributed to subfields including molecular biology, spectroscopy, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, genetics, and analytical chemistry.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas such as protein structure and dynamics, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research, protein purification and stability, mass spectrometry techniques and applications, bacterial genetics and biotechnology, viral infectious diseases and gene expression in insects, and heat shock proteins research.

Alison E. Ashcroft has authored significant papers, including:

  • "Inter-domain dynamics in the chaperone SurA and multi-site binding to its outer membrane protein clients" (2020, Nature Communications)
  • "An in vivo platform to select and evolve aggregation-resistant proteins" (2020, Nature Communications)
  • "Mass Spectrometry Characterization of Higher Order Structural Changes Associated with the Fc-glycan Structure of the NISTmAb Reference Material, RM 8761" (2020, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry)
  • "Validation of ion mobility spectrometry - mass spectrometry as a screening tool to identify type II kinase inhibitors of FGFR1 kinase" (2021, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry)
  • "Investigation of D76N β2-Microglobulin Using Protein Footprinting and Structural Mass Spectrometry" (2021, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry)

Frequent co-authors associated with Ashcroft's work include:

  • Sheena E. Radford
  • Bob Schiffrin
  • David J. Brockwell
  • Antonio N. Calabrese
  • Matthew A. Watson

Their publications have appeared repeatedly in journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, Analytical Chemistry, and materials affiliated with the University of Leeds.

Alison E. Ashcroft has contributed to book literature as well, notably publishing with the Royal Society of Chemistry. One known book is Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry (2021), which has been cited in subsequent scholarly works.

Best Publications

  • Deciphering drift time measurements from travelling wave ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry studies

    David P. Smith;Tom W. Knapman;Iain Campuzano;Richard W. Malham

  • Screening and classifying small-molecule inhibitors of amyloid formation using ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry

    Lydia M. Young;Janet C. Saunders;Rachel A. Mahood;Charlotte H. Revill

  • Lateral opening in the intact β-barrel assembly machinery captured by cryo-EM.

    Matthew G. Iadanza;Anna J. Higgins;Bob Schiffrin;Antonio N. Calabrese

  • N-terminal acetylation of α-synuclein induces increased transient helical propensity and decreased aggregation rates in the intrinsically disordered monomer

    Lijuan Kang;Gina M. Moriarty;Lucy A. Woods;Alison E. Ashcroft

  • Donor-Strand Exchange in Chaperone-Assisted Pilus Assembly Proceeds Through a Concerted Beta-Strand Displacement Mechanism

    Han Remaut;Rebecca J. Rose;Thomas J. Hannan;Scott J. Hultgren

  • Ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry defines the oligomeric intermediates in amylin amyloid formation and the mode of action of inhibitors.

    Lydia M. Young;Ping Cao;Daniel P. Raleigh;Alison E. Ashcroft

  • Elongated oligomers in β2-microglobulin amyloid assembly revealed by ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry

    David P. Smith;Sheena E. Radford;Alison E. Ashcroft

  • Direct observation of oligomeric species formed in the early stages of amyloid fibril formation using electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry.

    Andrew M. Smith;Thomas R. Jahn;Alison E. Ashcroft;Sheena E. Radford

  • Role of ADAMs in the ectodomain shedding and conformational conversion of the prion protein.

    David R. Taylor;Edward T. Parkin;Sarah L. Cocklin;James R. Ault

  • Widespread, routine occurrence of pharmaceuticals in sewage effluent, combined sewer overflows and receiving waters.

    Paul Kay;Stephen R. Hughes;James R. Ault;Alison E. Ashcroft

  • Monitoring copopulated conformational states during protein folding events using electrospray ionization-ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry.

    David P. Smith;Kevin Giles;Robert H. Bateman;Sheena E. Radford

  • Ligand binding to distinct states diverts aggregation of an amyloid-forming protein

    Lucy A Woods;Geoffrey W Platt;Andrew L Hellewell;Eric W Hewitt

  • The Effect of Dimethylbiguanide on Thrombin Activity, FXIII Activation, Fibrin Polymerization, and Fibrin Clot Formation

    Kristina F. Standeven;Robert A.S. Ariëns;Paul Whitaker;Alison E. Ashcroft

  • Engineering the surface properties of a human monoclonal antibody prevents self-association and rapid clearance in vivo

    Claire L. Dobson;Paul W. A. Devine;Jonathan J. Phillips;Daniel R. Higazi

  • Inducing protein aggregation by extensional flow

    John Dobson;Amit Kumar;Leon F Willis;Roman Tuma

  • Advances in ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry reveal key insights into amyloid assembly.

    L.A. Woods;S.E. Radford;A.E. Ashcroft

  • Determining the topology of virus assembly intermediates using ion mobility spectrometry–mass spectrometry

    Tom W. Knapman;Victoria L. Morton;Nicola J. Stonehouse;Peter G. Stockley

  • Skp is a multivalent chaperone of outer-membrane proteins

    Bob Schiffrin;Antonio N Calabrese;Paul W A Devine;Sarah A Harris

  • Considerations in experimental and theoretical collision cross-section measurements of small molecules using travelling wave ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry

    Tom W. Knapman;Joshua T. Berryman;Iain Campuzano;Sarah A. Harris

  • 5-Methylthiopentose: a new substituent on lipoarabinomannan in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    Achim Treumann;Feng Xidong;Liam McDonnell;Peter J Derrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Sheena E. Radford
Sheena E. Radford University of Leeds
Peter G. Stockley
Peter G. Stockley University of Leeds
Gabriel Waksman
Gabriel Waksman University College London
Christopher Exley
Christopher Exley Keele University
Peter J. F. Henderson
Peter J. F. Henderson University of Leeds
Daniel P. Raleigh
Daniel P. Raleigh Stony Brook University
Neil M. Ferguson
Neil M. Ferguson Imperial College London
Scott J. Hultgren
Scott J. Hultgren Washington University in St. Louis
Carol V. Robinson
Carol V. Robinson University of Oxford
Jutta Rieger
Jutta Rieger Sorbonne University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in the intersection of chemistry and law enforcement, exploring a forensic psychology graduate programs online can be a valuable step. These programs combine scientific knowledge with criminal behavior analysis, preparing graduates for specialized roles in forensic investigations.

Understanding the financial aspect is crucial. Many prospective students evaluate the criminal justice degree price to balance quality education with affordability. Online programs offer flexible, cost-effective options without compromising academic standards.

Entry into the field can start with an online associates in criminal justice, which provides foundational knowledge and practical skills for various roles in law enforcement and related areas. These degrees can be a springboard to further specialization.

Career prospects in forensic science are promising, with competitive salaries reflecting the advanced expertise required. Detailed insights into forensic science degree salary help students make informed decisions about their education and professional futures.

Best Scientists Citing Alison E. Ashcroft

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles