World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Aditya Khosla

Aditya Khosla

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 35 11409 11085 4687 4487 53 80749

Aditya Khosla publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aditya Khosla between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aditya Khosla published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2015. 2 of the 66 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2015. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 7 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
2008 2025

66 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aditya Khosla: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 1
2010 1
2011 3
2012 4
2013 4
2014 5
2015 9
2016 9
2017 6
2018 1
2019 1
2020 7
2021 3
2022 2
2023 7
2024 1
2025 1
Total 66
Download as CSV

Aditya Khosla publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aditya Khosla sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 52–61 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 53 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82 53
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Aditya Khosla D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aditya Khosla sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918 35
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Aditya Khosla is affiliated with MIT in the United States and has focused their research primarily on intersections of medicine and computer science. Their scholarly output includes works that span fields such as radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, artificial intelligence, oncology, genetics, and cancer research. The central themes of their work concentrate especially on radiomics and machine learning applied to medical imaging as well as the use of AI in cancer detection.

Their main topics of research cover:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Artificial Intelligence Enables Quantitative Assessment of Ulcerative Colitis Histology" (2023) published in Modern Pathology
  • "Distinct hepatic immunological patterns are associated with the progression or inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma" (2022) in Cell Reports
  • "AI powered quantification of nuclear morphology in cancers enables prediction of genome instability and prognosis" (2024) featured in npj Precision Oncology
  • "Abstract 5099: Quantification of TGFβ protein levels and digital pathology-based immune phenotyping reveal biomarkers for TGF-β blockade therapy patient selection in NSCLC" (2022) found in Cancer Research
  • "Improved statistical benchmarking of digital pathology models using pairwise frames evaluation" (2023) in arXiv (Cornell University)

Khosla collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Ilan Wapinski, Michael G. Drage, Fedaa Najdawi, Amaro Taylor-Weiner, and Jacqueline A. Brosnan-Cashman. These collaborations have resulted in multiple co-authored publications.

Their work has appeared repeatedly in well-established venues such as Cancer Research, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Gastroenterology, Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts, and Modern Pathology, indicating a consistent presence in both clinical and preprint research platforms.

Best Publications

  • ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge

    Olga Russakovsky;Jia Deng;Hao Su;Jonathan Krause

  • Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization

    Bolei Zhou;Aditya Khosla;Agata Lapedriza;Aude Oliva

  • 3D ShapeNets: A deep representation for volumetric shapes

    Zhirong Wu;Shuran Song;Aditya Khosla;Fisher Yu

  • Places: A 10 Million Image Database for Scene Recognition

    Bolei Zhou;Agata Lapedriza;Aditya Khosla;Aude Oliva

  • Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer.

    Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi;Mitko Veta;Paul Johannes van Diest;Bram van Ginneken

  • Multimodal Deep Learning

    Jiquan Ngiam;Aditya Khosla;Mingyu Kim;Juhan Nam

  • Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representations

    David Bau;Bolei Zhou;Aditya Khosla;Aude Oliva

  • Object Detectors Emerge in Deep Scene CNNs

    Bolei Zhou;Aditya Khosla;Agata Lapedriza;Aude Oliva

  • Eye Tracking for Everyone

    Kyle Krafka;Aditya Khosla;Petr Kellnhofer;Harini Kannan

  • Deep Learning for Identifying Metastatic Breast Cancer

    Dayong Wang;Aditya Khosla;Rishab Gargeya;Humayun Irshad

  • Comparison of deep neural networks to spatio-temporal cortical dynamics of human visual object recognition reveals hierarchical correspondence

    Radoslaw Martin Cichy;Aditya Khosla;Dimitrios Pantazis;Antonio Torralba

  • Human action recognition by learning bases of action attributes and parts

    Bangpeng Yao;Xiaoye Jiang;Aditya Khosla;Andy Lai Lin

  • Undoing the damage of dataset bias

    Aditya Khosla;Tinghui Zhou;Tomasz Malisiewicz;Alexei A. Efros

  • What makes an image popular

    Aditya Khosla;Atish Das Sarma;Raffay Hamid

  • Places: An Image Database for Deep Scene Understanding

    Bolei Zhou;Aditya Khosla;Àgata Lapedriza;Antonio Torralba

  • HOGgles: Visualizing Object Detection Features

    Carl Vondrick;Aditya Khosla;Tomasz Malisiewicz;Antonio Torralba

  • Combining randomization and discrimination for fine-grained image categorization

    Bangpeng Yao;Aditya Khosla;Li Fei-Fei

  • Understanding and Predicting Image Memorability at a Large Scale

    Aditya Khosla;Akhil S. Raju;Antonio Torralba;Aude Oliva

  • Large-Scale Video Summarization Using Web-Image Priors

    Aditya Khosla;Raffay Hamid;Chih-Jen Lin;Neel Sundaresan

  • Human-interpretable image features derived from densely mapped cancer pathology slides predict diverse molecular phenotypes.

    James A. Diao;Jason K. Wang;Wan Fung Chui;Victoria Mountain

  • ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge

    Olga Russakovsky;Jia Deng;Hao Su;Jonathan Krause

Frequent Co-Authors

Bolei Zhou
Bolei Zhou University of California, Los Angeles
Carl Vondrick
Carl Vondrick Columbia University
Jianxiong Xiao
Jianxiong Xiao AutoX, Inc.
Li Fei-Fei
Li Fei-Fei Stanford University
Hao Su
Hao Su University of California, San Diego
Michael S. Bernstein
Michael S. Bernstein Stanford University
Jia Deng
Jia Deng Princeton University
Alexander C. Berg
Alexander C. Berg University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Computer Science offers a wide range of online degree options that can help you advance your education and career without disrupting your current commitments. Whether you want to start your journey or specialize further, there are affordable and flexible choices available.

For those seeking to minimize costs, consider exploring the cheapest online masters in computer science and related fields. These programs combine quality instruction with budget-friendly tuition, making advanced education more accessible.

If you’re interested in building your leadership potential within tech or academia, an online PhD leadership program can provide specialized skills for management or executive roles.

Are you just starting out or looking for a faster entry to the workforce? Learn about what is the easiest associate's degree to get—including associate degrees in computer science, which offer a strong foundation with less time commitment.

For educators aiming to lead in digital learning or computer science education, the most affordable EdD programs provide practical, cost-effective pathways for career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Aditya Khosla

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles