| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 797 | 6 | 17 | 7 |
| Psychology | 964 | 17 | 22 | 6 |
The objective of Learning Disabilities Research and Practice is to combine knowledge in the areas of Learning disability, Mathematics education, Reading (process), Pedagogy and Teaching method. Learning disability studies covered in it falls within the purview of Developmental psychology. The research on Developmental psychology featured in it combines topics in other fields like Cognitive psychology, Cognition and Clinical psychology.
The Mathematics education works featured in the journal incorporate elements from Inclusion (education), Curriculum and Literacy. Topics in Reading (process) explored in Learning Disabilities Research and Practice were investigated in conjunction with research in At-risk students, Vocabulary and Fluency. The majority of Vocabulary studies are focused on the issues of Vocabulary development.
It covers various topics on Pedagogy such as Mainstreaming and Educational research. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice emphasizes research on Teaching method, which includes concerns such as Writing instruction. The journal focuses on Reading comprehension as well as the interrelated topic of Comprehension.
The published papers are mainly concerned with subjects like Learning disability, Mathematics education, Reading (process), Teaching method and Developmental psychology. The journal articles facilitate discussions on Learning disability that incorporate concepts from other fields like Psychological intervention, Special education, Academic achievement, Pedagogy and Intervention (counseling). The works on Mathematics education tackled in the most cited publications bring together disciplines like Inclusion (education) and Curriculum.
The journal covers a variety of subjects, including Learning disability, Mathematics education, Intervention (counseling), Content (Freudian dream analysis) and Developmental psychology. The journal served as a forum through which researchers explored different topics like Learning disability and Strategy development. The Mathematics instruction and Teaching method studies presented in it fall under the field of Mathematics education, but it also has connections to other fields such as Multiple source and Graph.
In addition to Mathematics instruction research, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice aims to explore topics under Special education, Writing instruction and Content area. The studies in Intervention (counseling) featured incorporate elements of Psychotherapist, Vocabulary and Field (Bourdieu). While the primary focus in the journal is Hebrew, it also dissects topics surrounding Reading (process) and Self-concept as a whole.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Learning Disabilities Research and Practice (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Learning Disabilities Research and Practice (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 4.35% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 31.82% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 4.55% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 27.27% of all publications and 36.36% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Among the many areas explored in the field of Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, one focus is developmental and cognitive psychology, which can lead to a variety of career paths such as Educational Psychologist, Special Education Teacher, or Behaviour Analyst. More specialized careers could involve the intersection of various fields like educational and forensic science, such as a Forensic Psychologist. Taking forensic science as an example, this career combines scientific principles with legal concepts, making it an interdisciplinary field, much like Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. Forensic scientists are required to analyze criminal case evidence, which can support the justice system in solving crimes and prosecuting perpetrators. To become a forensic scientist, you must possess strong analytical skills, attention to detail, and a strong understanding of scientific and legal principles. It requires a mix of specialist education and training, plus on-the-job experience. If you live in Kansas, you can get more detailed information about this career path through our comprehensive guide on how to become a forensic scientist in Kansas. In conclusion, the vast and interdisciplinary nature of Learning Disabilities Research and Practice allows for a wide range of career paths. A forensic scientist is just one of the numerous exciting career options that could be considered by those interested in an interdisciplinary approach to learning disabilities and education.
Lisa M. H. Sanetti;Bryan G. Cook;Lysandra Cook
(2021)Mohaned G. Abed;Todd K. Shackelford
(2020)Melinda M. Leko;Bryan G. Cook;Lysandra Cook
(2021)Angela Pasqualotto;Paola Venuti
(2020)Bryan G. Cook;Lauren W. Collins;Sara Cothren Cook;Lysandra Cook
(2020)Genesis D. Arizmendi;Jui‐Teng Li;M. Lee Van Horn;Stefania D. Petcu
(2021)Jonté A. Myers;Mary T. Brownell;Cynthia C. Griffin;Elizabeth M. Hughes
(2021)Rachel E. Donegan;Jeanne Wanzek;Stephanie Al Otaiba
(2020)For students interested in Psychology, exploring related fields like human services and speech-language pathology can open diverse career opportunities. Many aspiring professionals turn to a human services degree online as a flexible option to gain valuable skills that complement psychology knowledge. These programs often offer accelerated formats to help students complete their education efficiently.
Transitioning careers is common in this sector. For instance, educators considering a career shift can find guidance on how to move from teacher to SLP (Speech-Language Pathologist). This pathway highlights the transferable skills and educational steps required for such a change.
If speech-language pathology interests you, selecting an accredited program is crucial. Several options for the asha accredited online slp programs provide fast-paced coursework while meeting professional standards. These programs ensure graduates are eligible for certification and licensure.
Moreover, non-SLP majors can leverage online speech-language pathology prerequisites program options to fulfill required coursework and prepare for graduate studies. This flexible route supports career advancement with an appropriate foundation in communication sciences.
