Business Process Management 2023 Conference (BPM)

Name: Business Process Management
Start: 2023-09-11
End: 2023-09-15
Location: Utrecht

Location: Utrecht , Netherlands

Conference dates: 9/11/2023 - 9/15/2023

Research H-index

Official website

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name	Position	Best Scientists	Publications	D-Index
Computer Science	549	12	14	7

Call for Papers

Track I: Foundations
You should send your paper to Track I if one or more of the following apply:

It provides foundational insights about the underlying principles and concepts of BPM.
It advances state of the art in BPM through the investigation of formal methods and algorithms
It identifies novel problems in BPM, it contributes to the definition of novel problems, languages, architectures, as well as conceptual models, frameworks, patterns and taxonomies for BPM.
It demonstrates technical quality and shows how the developed foundations permit new ways of modelling or analysing BPM systems.

Track II: Engineering
You should send your paper to Track II if one or more of the following apply:

It proposes a significant contribution in the form of an artefact or system.
Its results are empirically evaluated in a rigorous and reproducible manner (reproducibility includes making available the data, code and other relevant aspects of the evaluation)
It reports on an artefact or system you designed, with a maturity of at least a prototype, i.e., it can be evaluated in an application context.

Track III: Management
You should send your paper to Track III if one or more of the following apply:

It tackles an organisational challenge/opportunity from a process-oriented perspective.
It considers all of the following socio-technical aspects from a process-oriented perspective: technology, task, and people.
It extends the BPM body of knowledge to better contribute to process innovation, process-related digitalization, and organisational routines.
It builds on and draws from real-world organisational endeavours in BPM.
It contributes to solving grand societal challenges through BPM.

Overview

The ranking presented on this page features a comprehensive listing of scientific conferences in the field of Engineering and Technology. This ranking has been meticulously prepared by Research.com, a leading website in science research that has provided trusted and authoritative data on scientific contributions across all major fields, including Engineering and Technology, since 2014.

Conference positions in this ranking are determined using a unique bibliometric score developed by Research.com. This score is calculated based on the estimated h-index and the number of leading scientists who have participated in the conference during the previous three years, offering a robust evaluation framework that reflects both the quality of the conferences and their appeal to top-tier researchers.

The Impact Score values presented in this ranking were collected on 2024-11-27, ensuring that the data reflects the most recent and relevant developments in the field. The ranking process involved an extensive review and rigorous analysis of more than 2,262 conferences. These were carefully selected following a detailed inspection of over 26,934 scientific documents published within the last three years by 9,385 of the most prominent and respected scientists in Engineering and Technology.

The methodological approach underpinning this ranking embodies a thorough and expert-driven evaluation, designed to offer the most accurate and credible insights into the scientific impact of Engineering and Technology conferences. For in-depth information about the methodology and metrics used in computing these ranking scores, please visit our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at Business Process Management (based on the number of publications) are:

Wil M. P. van der Aalst (45 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
Jan Mendling (41 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
Mathias Weske (36 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
Manfred Reichert (33 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
Hajo A. Reijers (27 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Business Process Management (based on the number of publications) are:

Eindhoven University of Technology (134 papers) published 13 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
Queensland University of Technology (74 papers) published 13 papers at the last edition, 11 more than at the previous edition,
IBM (52 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
University of Ulm (36 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
University of Tartu (34 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2018 edition, 9.68% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 30.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 17.14% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.43% of all publications and 36.43% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options can be a smart step for those interested in Computer Science careers in the USA. Many universities now offer flexible and accelerated learning paths tailored to students’ busy lifestyles. For example, the best online computer science degree programs provide comprehensive training with the convenience of remote study, helping learners advance quickly.

For those looking to specialize, data science is a rapidly growing field. Students seeking cost-effective options should consider the cheapest data science masters in usa programs, which balance affordability with quality education and open doors to lucrative tech roles.

At the cutting edge, pursuing an online phd in artificial intelligence usa offers the opportunity to contribute to advanced research and innovation in AI technologies, an area with growing demand in academia and industry alike.

Cybersecurity is another critical discipline within Computer Science. For those aiming to enter this field rapidly, the fast cyber security degree options enable students to gain essential skills and certifications quickly, preparing them for vital roles in protecting digital infrastructures.