World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
5201
World Ranking
6439
National Ranking
400

Zoë Lindo publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoë Lindo sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Zoë Lindo D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zoë Lindo sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Zoë Lindo is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research spans a range of topics primarily centered on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences. Their scholarly contributions emphasize ecological dynamics, soil science, and the impacts of climate change on ecosystems.

Their recent publications include works such as:

  • Globally invariant metabolism but density-diversity mismatch in springtails, 2023, Nature Communications
  • A global database for metacommunity ecology, integrating species, traits, environment and space, 2020, Scientific Data
  • Response of soil fauna to simulated global change factors depends on ambient climate conditions, 2020, Pedobiologia
  • Impact of changing climate on bryophyte contributions to terrestrial water, carbon, and nitrogen cycles, 2024, New Phytologist
  • Multiple dimensions of soil food-web research: History and prospects, 2023, European Journal of Soil Biology

Lindo's frequent co-authors include Carlos Barreto, Robert W. Buchkowski, Anton Potapov, Matthew L. Meehan, and Brian A. Branfireun. Collaborative research with these scientists has contributed to a body of work in soil biology and ecosystem ecology.

Among the venues where Lindo commonly publishes are:

  • Pedobiologia
  • European Journal of Soil Biology
  • Scientific Data
  • Soil Biology and Biochemistry
  • Functional Ecology

Their main fields of study are Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with noted subfields including Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Research topics addressed by Lindo include:

  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Study of Mite Species

In addition to journal articles, Lindo has contributed to book publications with one title released by Frontiers Media in 2024 titled Women in Biogeochemical Dynamics Research: 2022. Another forthcoming book, Measuring and assessing the biological health of soils, is set for publication by Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited in 2025.

Best Publications

  • The Bryosphere: An Integral and Influential Component of the Earth’s Biosphere

    Zoë Lindo;Andrew Gonzalez

  • Climate change drives a shift in peatland ecosystem plant community: Implications for ecosystem function and stability

    Catherine M. Dieleman;Brian A. Branfireun;James W. McLaughlin;Zoë Lindo

  • Bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations as regulators of the northern latitude carbon balance in response to global change.

    Zoë Lindo;Marie‐Charlotte Nilsson;Michael J. Gundale

  • Connectivity, non‐random extinction and ecosystem function in experimental metacommunities

    Philip Staddon;Zoë Lindo;Peter D. Crittenden;Francis Gilbert

  • The disentangled bank: How loss of habitat fragments and disassembles ecological networks

    Andrew Gonzalez;Bronwyn Rayfield;Zoë Lindo

  • Microbial biomass, nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization, and mesofauna in boreal conifer and deciduous forest floors following partial and clear-cut harvesting

    Zoë Lindo;Suzanne Visser

  • Metacommunity diversity depends on connectivity and patch arrangement in heterogeneous habitat networks

    Chelsea Chisholm;Zoë Lindo;Andrew Gonzalez

  • A methodological framework to embrace soil biodiversity

    Stefan Geisen;Maria J.I. Briones;Huijie Gan;Valerie M. Behan-Pelletier

  • A comparison of microarthropod assemblages with emphasis on oribatid mites in canopy suspended soils and forest floors associated with ancient western redcedar trees

    Zoë Lindo;Neville N. Winchester

  • Globally invariant metabolism but density-diversity mismatch in springtails

    Unknown

  • Forest floor microarthropod abundance and oribatid mite (Acari: Oribatida) composition following partial and clear-cut harvesting in the mixedwood boreal forest

    Zoë Lindo;Suzanne Visser

  • A community of metacommunities: exploring patterns in species distributions across large geographical areas.

    Renato Henriques-Silva;Zoë Lindo;Pedro R. Peres-Neto

  • Quantifying and mapping ecosystem service use across stakeholder groups: Implications for conservation with priorities for cultural values

    Rachel Darvill;Zoë Lindo

  • Spatial and environmental factors contributing to patterns in arboreal and terrestrial oribatid mite diversity across spatial scales

    Zoë Lindo;Neville N. Winchester

  • The inclusion of stakeholders and cultural ecosystem services in land management trade-off decisions using an ecosystem services approach

    Rachel Darvill;Zoë Lindo

  • Traits explain community disassembly and trophic contraction following experimental environmental change

    Zoë Lindo;Jonathan Whiteley;Andrew Gonzalez

  • Priorities for research in soil ecology

    Nico Eisenhauer;Pedro M Antunes;Alison E Bennett;Klaus Birkhofer

  • Are leaf litter and microbes team players? Interpreting home-field advantage decomposition dynamics

    Julia E. Palozzi;Zoë Lindo

  • Old trees contribute bio-available nitrogen through canopy bryophytes

    Zoë Lindo;Jonathan A. Whiteley

  • Post-fire succession of collembolan communities in a northern hardwood forest

    K. Huebner;Z. Lindo;M.J. Lechowicz

  • Oribatid mite communities and foliar litter decomposition in canopy suspended soils and forest floor habitats of western redcedar forests, Vancouver Island, Canada

    Zoë Lindo;Neville N. Winchester

  • Forest floor microarthropod abundance and oribatid mite (Acari: Oribatida) composition following partial and clear-cut harvesting in the

    Zoë Lindo;Suzanne Visser

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian A. Branfireun
Brian A. Branfireun University of Western Ontario
Valerie M. Behan-Pelletier
Valerie M. Behan-Pelletier Agriculture and Agriculture-Food Canada
Andrew Gonzalez
Andrew Gonzalez McGill University
Matthias C. Rillig
Matthias C. Rillig Freie Universität Berlin
Franciska T. de Vries
Franciska T. de Vries University of Amsterdam
Christoph F. J. Meyer
Christoph F. J. Meyer University of Salford
Diana H. Wall
Diana H. Wall Colorado State University
Adrià López-Baucells
Adrià López-Baucells Museu de Ciències Naturals de Granollers
Ignacio Ribera
Ignacio Ribera Spanish National Research Council
Tancredi Caruso
Tancredi Caruso Queen's University Belfast

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Ecology and Evolution, there are many online degree options and career paths that might complement or expand your expertise. For example, those drawn to healthcare or communication science could consider accredited speech pathology programs. These flexible, online degrees allow you to enter a rapidly growing field that intersects with biology and behavioral science.

Non-science majors can also pivot into high-demand careers. Explore the transition to SLP master’s for non-CSD majors if you’re interested in speech-language pathology but didn’t study communication sciences as an undergraduate.

Those with a bachelor’s in a non-nursing field can choose to earn their BSN through non nursing degree to bsn online programs, which offer fast tracks into nursing. For individuals looking to further specialize, the lucrative and in-demand role of psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner is also worth considering; see average psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner salary by state.

Exploring these options can help you discover new interdisciplinary career pathways where you can make an impact in health, science, and education.

Best Scientists Citing Zoë Lindo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles