| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 8757 | 8178 | 4658 | 4240 | 135 | 8303 |
The chart shows the history of publications by William Sack between 1976 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William Sack published across 45 years, from 1976 to 2020, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 1997. 1 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.
166 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1976 | 1 |
| 1977 | 3 |
| 1978 | 2 |
| 1979 | 3 |
| 1980 | 1 |
| 1981 | 0 |
| 1982 | 2 |
| 1983 | 1 |
| 1984 | 2 |
| 1985 | 3 |
| 1986 | 3 |
| 1987 | 4 |
| 1988 | 1 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4 |
| 1992 | 8 |
| 1993 | 13 |
| 1994 | 20 |
| 1995 | 24 |
| 1996 | 21 |
| 1997 | 36 |
| 1998 | 5 |
| 1999 | 2 |
| 2000 | 1 |
| 2001 | 1 |
| 2002 | 0 |
| 2003 | 1 |
| 2004 | 0 |
| 2005 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1 |
| 2007 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1 |
| 2009 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 1 |
| Total | 166 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Sack sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 135 publications — 41st percentile
41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 31–40 | 6 | |
| 41–50 | 52 | |
| 51–60 | 138 | |
| 61–70 | 299 | |
| 71–80 | 461 | |
| 81–90 | 605 | |
| 91–100 | 713 | |
| 101–110 | 736 | |
| 111–120 | 686 | |
| 121–130 | 670 | |
| 131–140 | 644 | 135 |
| 141–150 | 597 | |
| 151–160 | 576 | |
| 161–170 | 477 | |
| 171–180 | 450 | |
| 181–190 | 397 | |
| 191–200 | 343 | |
| 201–210 | 328 | |
| 211–220 | 313 | |
| 221–230 | 283 | |
| 231–240 | 226 | |
| 241–250 | 196 | |
| 251–260 | 201 | |
| 261–270 | 171 | |
| 271–280 | 151 | |
| 281–290 | 139 | |
| 291–300 | 113 | |
| 301–310 | 102 | |
| 311–320 | 100 | |
| 321–330 | 76 | |
| 331–340 | 92 | |
| 341–350 | 85 | |
| 351–360 | 69 | |
| 361–370 | 71 | |
| 371–380 | 63 | |
| 381–390 | 58 | |
| 391–400 | 57 | |
| 401–410 | 43 | |
| 411–420 | 33 | |
| 421–430 | 50 | |
| 431–440 | 41 | |
| 441–450 | 32 | |
| 451–460 | 27 | |
| 461–470 | 28 | |
| 471–480 | 25 | |
| 481–490 | 28 | |
| 491–500 | 20 | |
| 501–510 | 23 | |
| 511–520 | 26 | |
| 521–530 | 17 | |
| 531–540 | 21 | |
| 541–550 | 14 | |
| 551–560 | 16 | |
| 561–570 | 10 | |
| 571–580 | 22 | |
| 581–590 | 9 | |
| 591–600 | 14 | |
| 601–610 | 9 | |
| 611–620 | 11 | |
| 621–630 | 4 | |
| 631–640 | 7 | |
| 641–650 | 5 | |
| 651–660 | 10 | |
| 661–670 | 8 | |
| 671–680 | 8 | |
| 681–690 | 4 | |
| 691–700 | 3 | |
| 701–704 | 4 | |
| 705+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Sack sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile
24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 398 | |
| 32–33 | 702 | |
| 34–35 | 671 | |
| 36–37 | 659 | |
| 38–39 | 641 | 38 |
| 40–41 | 671 | |
| 42–43 | 617 | |
| 44–45 | 558 | |
| 46–47 | 495 | |
| 48–49 | 487 | |
| 50–51 | 445 | |
| 52–53 | 390 | |
| 54–55 | 408 | |
| 56–57 | 345 | |
| 58–59 | 325 | |
| 60–61 | 321 | |
| 62–63 | 248 | |
| 64–65 | 290 | |
| 66–67 | 218 | |
| 68–69 | 219 | |
| 70–71 | 215 | |
| 72–73 | 183 | |
| 74–75 | 169 | |
| 76–77 | 132 | |
| 78–79 | 137 | |
| 80–81 | 120 | |
| 82–83 | 112 | |
| 84–85 | 86 | |
| 86–87 | 101 | |
| 88–89 | 83 | |
| 90–91 | 77 | |
| 92–93 | 70 | |
| 94–95 | 78 | |
| 96–97 | 58 | |
| 98–99 | 53 | |
| 100–101 | 57 | |
| 102–103 | 48 | |
| 104–105 | 53 | |
| 106–107 | 46 | |
| 108–109 | 24 | |
| 110–111 | 35 | |
| 112–113 | 27 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 31 | |
| 118–119 | 22 | |
| 120–121 | 16 | |
| 122–123 | 24 | |
| 124–125 | 18 | |
| 126–127 | 11 | |
| 128–129 | 19 | |
| 130–131 | 10 | |
| 132–133 | 16 | |
| 134–135 | 10 | |
| 136–137 | 12 | |
| 138–139 | 8 | |
| 140–141 | 5 | |
| 142–143 | 12 | |
| 144+ | 98 |
Martin B. Keller;Neal D. Ryan;Michael Strober;Rachel G. Klein
J. David Kinzie;William H. Sack;Richard H. Angell;Spero M. Manson
Peter M. Lewinsohn;Richard Zinbarg;John R. Seeley;Mark Lewinsohn
J David Kinzie;William Sack;Richard Angell;Greg Clarke
William H. Sack;Chanrithy Him;Dan Dickason
William H. Sack;Gregory N. Clarke;John Seeley
William H. Sack;Greg Clarke;Chanrithy Him;Dan Dickason
William H. Sack;Gregory N. Clarke;John Seeley
William H. Sack;John R. Seeley;Gregory N. Clarke
Janette Beals;Joan Piasecki;Scott Nelson;Monica Jones
William H. Sack;Shirley McSHARRY;Gregory N. Clarke;Ronald Kinney
William H. Sack;Richard H. Angell;J. David Kinzie;Ben Rath
John Gale;Robert J. Thompson;Thomas Moran;William H. Sack
Greg Clarke;William H. Sack;Brian Goff
Unknown
Unknown
Douglas K. Novins;William Sack
Peter M. Lewinsohn;John R. Seeley;Judith Hibbard;Paul Rohde
Geri Fox;William H. Sack
David W. Cline;William Sack
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.