World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
14312
World Ranking
5243
National Ranking
2414

William Pugh publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Pugh sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 100 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

William Pugh D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Pugh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

William Pugh is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with contributions spanning Geochemistry and Petrology, Geology, and interdisciplinary areas involving Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their work covers several key research topics, including:

  • Geological Modeling and Analysis
  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction

William Pugh has published in venues such as Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America and UNC Libraries. Their recent papers include:

  • 3D MODELING AND PRINTING AS A RESOURCE IN PALEONTOLOGICAL OUTREACH (2022), Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Efficient Distribution Analysis via Graph Contraction (2021), UNC Libraries

The scientist has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • JP Crothers
  • Andrew B. Heckert
  • Thomas Sheffler
  • Robert D. Schreiber
  • John R. Gilbert

Best Publications

  • Finding bugs is easy

    David Hovemeyer;William Pugh

  • Skip lists: a probabilistic alternative to balanced trees

    William Pugh

  • The Omega test: a fast and practical integer programming algorithm for dependence analysis

    William Pugh

  • The Java memory model

    Jeremy Manson;William Pugh;Sarita V. Adve

  • Using Static Analysis to Find Bugs

    N. Ayewah;D. Hovemeyer;J.D. Morgenthaler;J. Penix

  • A practical algorithm for exact array dependence analysis

    William Pugh

  • Evaluating static analysis defect warnings on production software

    Nathaniel Ayewah;William Pugh;J. David Morgenthaler;John Penix

  • The Omega Library interface guide

    Wayne Kelly;Vadim Maslov;William Pugh;Evan Rosser

  • Incremental computation via function caching

    W. Pugh;T. Teitelbaum

  • An Exact Method for Analysis of Value-based Array Data Dependences

    William Pugh;David Wonnacott

  • Symbolic Model Checking of Infinite State Systems Using Presburger Arithmetic

    Tevfik Bultan;Richard Gerber;William Pugh

  • Counting solutions to Presburger formulas: how and why

    William Pugh

  • Fixing the Java memory model

    William Pugh

  • Eliminating false data dependences using the Omega test

    William Pugh;David Wonnacott

  • Experiences with marmoset: designing and using an advanced submission and testing system for programming courses

    Jaime Spacco;David Hovemeyer;William Pugh;Fawzi Emad

  • Code generation for multiple mappings

    W. Kelly;W. Pugh;E. Rosser

  • Model-checking concurrent systems with unbounded integer variables: symbolic representations, approximations, and experimental results

    Tevfik Bultan;Richard Gerber;William Pugh

  • Finding more null pointer bugs, but not too many

    David Hovemeyer;William Pugh

  • A framework for unifying reordering transformations

    Wayne Kelly;William Pugh

  • The Google FindBugs fixit

    Nathaniel Ayewah;William Pugh

  • Finding bugs is easy : Track

    David Hovemeyer;William Pugh

Frequent Co-Authors

Tatiana Shpeisman
Tatiana Shpeisman Intel (United States)
Tevfik Bultan
Tevfik Bultan University of California, Santa Barbara
Dexter Kozen
Dexter Kozen Cornell University
Jeanne Ferrante
Jeanne Ferrante University of California, San Diego
Jan F. Prins
Jan F. Prins University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Samuel P. Midkiff
Samuel P. Midkiff Purdue University West Lafayette
Manish Gupta
Manish Gupta Google (United States)
Chau-Wen Tseng
Chau-Wen Tseng University of Maryland, College Park
John R. Gilbert
John R. Gilbert University of California, Santa Barbara
Michael Hicks
Michael Hicks University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees is a flexible way to expand your expertise and enhance your career prospects in tech and beyond. Whether you want to build a specialized skill set or accelerate your advancement, many pathways are available.

For students interested in the booming field of data analysis, consider earning an online masters for data science. These programs balance affordability with industry-relevant training, preparing graduates for in-demand data roles.

If you’re pursuing opportunities in construction or management, an accelerated online construction management degree can help you enter the workforce faster. These programs are designed for efficiency, letting you earn a respected credential in less time.

Many professionals also value the career boost from an MBA. For budget-conscious students, there are online mba cheap options that offer the flexibility and recognition to propel your business ambitions.

Finally, those eager to make quick progress may find value in one year graduate programs—online offerings that deliver a master’s credential on an accelerated timeline, opening doors to new opportunities sooner.

Best Scientists Citing William Pugh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles