World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 32 8798 8176 2849 2522 129 2976

Warren Barrash publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Warren Barrash between 1982 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Warren Barrash published across 41 years, from 1982 to 2022, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2006. 4 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2006. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications
1982 2022

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Warren Barrash: publications per year, 1982 to 2022
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 2
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 3
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 4
1998 3
1999 6
2000 1
2001 1
2002 5
2003 7
2004 7
2005 6
2006 11
2007 8
2008 4
2009 11
2010 5
2011 11
2012 7
2013 7
2014 9
2015 5
2016 3
2017 0
2018 1
2019 2
2020 2
2021 1
2022 3
Total 140
Download as CSV

Warren Barrash publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Warren Barrash sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 129 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557 129
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Warren Barrash D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Warren Barrash sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278 32
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Warren Barrash is affiliated with Boise State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple scientific domains with a primary focus on Engineering, Earth and Planetary Sciences, and Environmental Science.

The main subfields of study for Barrash include Geophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, and Civil and Structural Engineering. Their work centers on core topics such as Groundwater flow and contamination studies, Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques, Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography, Seismic Waves and Analysis, Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors, Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods, and Flow Measurement and Analysis.

Barrash has coauthored papers with multiple frequent collaborators including Carsten Leven, Kan Bun Cheng, Gédéon Dagan, Michael Cardiff, and Avinoam Rabinovich.

They have published research in several notable venues. The most frequent venues include Ground Water, Water Resources Research, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Barrash are:

  • Fiber Optic Pressure Measurements Open Up New Experimental Possibilities in Hydrogeology, 2021, Ground Water
  • Statistical Analysis of Aquifer Hydraulic Properties by a Continuous Pumping Tomography Test: Application to the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, 2022, Water Resources Research
  • Statistical analysis of aquifer hydraulic properties by a continuous pumping tomography test: Application to the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, 2022, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Comment on "Aquifer Characterization Using Fiber Bragg Grating Multi-Level Monitoring System", 2022, Ground Water

Best Publications

  • Tomography of the Darcy velocity from self-potential measurements

    Abderrahim Jardani;A. Revil;A. Revil;A. Boleve;A. Crespy

  • Hierarchical geostatistics and multifacies systems: Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, Boise, Idaho

    Warren Barrash;Tom Clemo

  • Multivariate Analysis of Cross-Hole Georadar Velocity and Attenuation Tomograms for Aquifer Zonation

    Jens Tronicke;Klaus Holliger;Warren Barrash;Michael D. Knoll

  • Aquifer Heterogeneity Characterization with Oscillatory Pumping: Sensitivity Analysis and Imaging Potential

    M. Cardiff;M. Cardiff;T. Bakhos;P. K. Kitanidis;W. Barrash

  • A potential-based inversion of unconfined steady-state hydraulic tomography.

    M. Cardiff;Warren Barrash;P. K. Kitanidis;Bwalya Malama

  • 3-D Transient Hydraulic Tomography in Unconfined Aquifers with Fast Drainage Response

    Michael A. Cardiff;Michael A. Cardiff;Warren Barrash

  • Hydraulic Conductivity Imaging from 3-D Transient Hydraulic Tomography at Several Pumping/Observation Densities

    Michael Cardiff;Michael Cardiff;Warren Barrash;Peter K. Kitanidis

  • A Field Proof-of-Concept of Aquifer Imaging Using 3-D Transient Hydraulic Tomography with Modular, Temporarily-Emplaced Equipment

    Michael Cardiff;Michael Cardiff;Warren Barrash;Peter K. Kitanidis

  • Reconstruction of the water table from self-potential data: a bayesian approach.

    A. Jardani;A. Revil;Warren Barrash;A. Crespy

  • Field, laboratory, and modeling investigation of the skin effect at wells with slotted casing, Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site

    Warren Barrash;Tom Clemo;Jessica J. Fox;Timothy C. Johnson

  • Estimating porosity with ground-penetrating radar reflection tomography: A controlled 3-D experiment at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site

    John H. Bradford;William P. Clement;Warren Barrash

  • A view toward the future of subsurface characterization : CAT scanning groundwater basins

    Tian Chyi Jim Yeh;Cheng Haw Lee;Kuo Chin Hsu;Walter A. Illman

  • Significance of porosity for stratigraphy and textural composition in subsurface, coarse fluvial deposits: Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site

    Warren Barrash;Edward C. Reboulet

  • Frequency dependent hydraulic properties estimated from oscillatory pumping tests in an unconfined aquifer.

    Avinoam Rabinovich;Warren Barrash;Warren Barrash;Michael Cardiff;David L. Hochstetler

  • Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site (Bhrs): Objectives, Design, Initial Geostatistical Results

    Warren Barrash;Tom Clemo;Michael D. Knoll

  • A field comparison of Fresnel zone and ray-based GPR attenuation-difference tomography for time-lapse imaging of electrically anomalous tracer or contaminant plumes

    Timothy C. Johnson;Partha S. Routh;Warren Barrash;Michael D. Knoll

  • Hydraulic Tomography: Continuity and Discontinuity of High- K and Low- K Zones

    David L. Hochstetler;Warren Barrash;Warren Barrash;Carsten Leven;Michael Cardiff

  • Inversion of Multiple Intersecting High-Resolution Crosshole GPR Profiles for Hydrological Characterization at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site

    Baptiste Dafflon;J. Irving;Warren Barrash

  • Aquifer Imaging with Oscillatory Hydraulic Tomography: Application at the Field Scale.

    Michael Cardiff;YaoQuan Zhou;YaoQuan Zhou;Warren Barrash;Peter K. Kitanidis

  • Semi-analytical solution for flow in leaky unconfined aquifer–aquitard systems

    Bwalya Malama;Kristopher L. Kuhlman;Warren Barrash

  • Examining the influence of heterogeneous porosity fields on conservative solute transport

    Bill X. Hu;Mark M. Meerschaert;Warren Barrash;David W. Hyndman

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter K. Kitanidis
Peter K. Kitanidis Stanford University
André Revil
André Revil Université Savoie Mont Blanc
David W. Hyndman
David W. Hyndman The University of Texas at Dallas
Lee Slater
Lee Slater Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Andrew Binley
Andrew Binley Lancaster University
Enzo Rizzo
Enzo Rizzo University of Ferrara
Thomas M. Johnson
Thomas M. Johnson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Abderrahim Jardani
Abderrahim Jardani University of Rouen
James J. Butler
James J. Butler University of Kansas
Mark M. Meerschaert
Mark M. Meerschaert Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Earth Science, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Veterans seeking flexible learning options may find programs like online photography degree programs for veterans appealing, which develop skills useful in environmental documentation and fieldwork.

Language skills are also valuable in global scientific collaboration. The best military friendly online Spanish degrees offer veterans an opportunity to supplement their science backgrounds with communication skills relevant in many Earth Science fields.

Cost and duration can be important considerations. Students looking for quick, affordable options might consider short Spanish degrees online, which provide excellent pay potential alongside foundational language fluency.

Additionally, creative interdisciplinary approaches are gaining traction. Programs like the MFA online programs integrate artistic perspectives, which can enhance scientific communication and public outreach in environmental sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Warren Barrash

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles