World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Warren Barrash publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Warren Barrash sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Warren Barrash D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Warren Barrash sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Warren Barrash is affiliated with Boise State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple scientific domains with a primary focus on Engineering, Earth and Planetary Sciences, and Environmental Science.

The main subfields of study for Barrash include Geophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, and Civil and Structural Engineering. Their work centers on core topics such as Groundwater flow and contamination studies, Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques, Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography, Seismic Waves and Analysis, Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors, Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods, and Flow Measurement and Analysis.

Barrash has coauthored papers with multiple frequent collaborators including Carsten Leven, Kan Bun Cheng, Gédéon Dagan, Michael Cardiff, and Avinoam Rabinovich.

They have published research in several notable venues. The most frequent venues include Ground Water, Water Resources Research, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Barrash are:

  • Fiber Optic Pressure Measurements Open Up New Experimental Possibilities in Hydrogeology, 2021, Ground Water
  • Statistical Analysis of Aquifer Hydraulic Properties by a Continuous Pumping Tomography Test: Application to the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, 2022, Water Resources Research
  • Statistical analysis of aquifer hydraulic properties by a continuous pumping tomography test: Application to the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, 2022, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Comment on "Aquifer Characterization Using Fiber Bragg Grating Multi-Level Monitoring System", 2022, Ground Water

Best Publications

  • Tomography of the Darcy velocity from self-potential measurements

    Abderrahim Jardani;A. Revil;A. Revil;A. Boleve;A. Crespy

  • Hierarchical geostatistics and multifacies systems: Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, Boise, Idaho

    Warren Barrash;Tom Clemo

  • Multivariate Analysis of Cross-Hole Georadar Velocity and Attenuation Tomograms for Aquifer Zonation

    Jens Tronicke;Klaus Holliger;Warren Barrash;Michael D. Knoll

  • Aquifer Heterogeneity Characterization with Oscillatory Pumping: Sensitivity Analysis and Imaging Potential

    M. Cardiff;M. Cardiff;T. Bakhos;P. K. Kitanidis;W. Barrash

  • A potential-based inversion of unconfined steady-state hydraulic tomography.

    M. Cardiff;Warren Barrash;P. K. Kitanidis;Bwalya Malama

  • 3-D Transient Hydraulic Tomography in Unconfined Aquifers with Fast Drainage Response

    Michael A. Cardiff;Michael A. Cardiff;Warren Barrash

  • Hydraulic Conductivity Imaging from 3-D Transient Hydraulic Tomography at Several Pumping/Observation Densities

    Michael Cardiff;Michael Cardiff;Warren Barrash;Peter K. Kitanidis

  • A Field Proof-of-Concept of Aquifer Imaging Using 3-D Transient Hydraulic Tomography with Modular, Temporarily-Emplaced Equipment

    Michael Cardiff;Michael Cardiff;Warren Barrash;Peter K. Kitanidis

  • Reconstruction of the water table from self-potential data: a bayesian approach.

    A. Jardani;A. Revil;Warren Barrash;A. Crespy

  • Field, laboratory, and modeling investigation of the skin effect at wells with slotted casing, Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site

    Warren Barrash;Tom Clemo;Jessica J. Fox;Timothy C. Johnson

  • Estimating porosity with ground-penetrating radar reflection tomography: A controlled 3-D experiment at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site

    John H. Bradford;William P. Clement;Warren Barrash

  • A view toward the future of subsurface characterization : CAT scanning groundwater basins

    Tian Chyi Jim Yeh;Cheng Haw Lee;Kuo Chin Hsu;Walter A. Illman

  • Significance of porosity for stratigraphy and textural composition in subsurface, coarse fluvial deposits: Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site

    Warren Barrash;Edward C. Reboulet

  • Frequency dependent hydraulic properties estimated from oscillatory pumping tests in an unconfined aquifer.

    Avinoam Rabinovich;Warren Barrash;Warren Barrash;Michael Cardiff;David L. Hochstetler

  • Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site (Bhrs): Objectives, Design, Initial Geostatistical Results

    Warren Barrash;Tom Clemo;Michael D. Knoll

  • A field comparison of Fresnel zone and ray-based GPR attenuation-difference tomography for time-lapse imaging of electrically anomalous tracer or contaminant plumes

    Timothy C. Johnson;Partha S. Routh;Warren Barrash;Michael D. Knoll

  • Hydraulic Tomography: 3D Hydraulic Conductivity, Fracture Network, and Connectivity in Mudstone.

    Claire R. Tiedeman;Warren Barrash

  • Hydraulic Tomography: Continuity and Discontinuity of High- K and Low- K Zones

    David L. Hochstetler;Warren Barrash;Warren Barrash;Carsten Leven;Michael Cardiff

  • Inversion of Multiple Intersecting High-Resolution Crosshole GPR Profiles for Hydrological Characterization at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site

    Baptiste Dafflon;J. Irving;Warren Barrash

  • Aquifer Imaging with Oscillatory Hydraulic Tomography: Application at the Field Scale.

    Michael Cardiff;YaoQuan Zhou;YaoQuan Zhou;Warren Barrash;Peter K. Kitanidis

  • Semi-analytical solution for flow in leaky unconfined aquifer–aquitard systems

    Bwalya Malama;Kristopher L. Kuhlman;Warren Barrash

  • Examining the influence of heterogeneous porosity fields on conservative solute transport

    Bill X. Hu;Mark M. Meerschaert;Warren Barrash;David W. Hyndman

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter K. Kitanidis
Peter K. Kitanidis Stanford University
André Revil
André Revil Université Savoie Mont Blanc
David W. Hyndman
David W. Hyndman The University of Texas at Dallas
Lee Slater
Lee Slater Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Andrew Binley
Andrew Binley Lancaster University
Enzo Rizzo
Enzo Rizzo University of Ferrara
Thomas M. Johnson
Thomas M. Johnson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Abderrahim Jardani
Abderrahim Jardani University of Rouen
James J. Butler
James J. Butler University of Kansas
Mark M. Meerschaert
Mark M. Meerschaert Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Earth Science, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Veterans seeking flexible learning options may find programs like online photography degree programs for veterans appealing, which develop skills useful in environmental documentation and fieldwork.

Language skills are also valuable in global scientific collaboration. The best military friendly online Spanish degrees offer veterans an opportunity to supplement their science backgrounds with communication skills relevant in many Earth Science fields.

Cost and duration can be important considerations. Students looking for quick, affordable options might consider short Spanish degrees online, which provide excellent pay potential alongside foundational language fluency.

Additionally, creative interdisciplinary approaches are gaining traction. Programs like the MFA online programs integrate artistic perspectives, which can enhance scientific communication and public outreach in environmental sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Warren Barrash

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles