World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
41
Citations
5225
World Ranking
5933
National Ranking
106

Vinicius F. Farjalla publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vinicius F. Farjalla sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 119 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Vinicius F. Farjalla D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vinicius F. Farjalla sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Vinicius F. Farjalla is affiliated with the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil and has contributed extensively to the field of Environmental Science. Their research often addresses ecological and environmental dynamics, focusing on the interplay between species, ecosystems, and climate change.

Their recent publications span various topics related to freshwater ecosystems, trophic structures, and ecological responses to environmental changes. Notable papers include:

  • Extreme rainfall events alter the trophic structure in bromeliad tanks across the Neotropics, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Ecological response to altered rainfall differs across the Neotropics, 2020, Ecology
  • Dissolved methane concentrations and fluxes to the atmosphere from a tropical floodplain lake, 2020, Biogeochemistry
  • Global and local drivers of the relative importance of allochthonous and autochthonous energy sources to freshwater food webs, 2023, Ecography
  • Business, biodiversity, and innovation in Brazil, 2023, Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Vinicius F. Farjalla include:

  • Gustavo Q. Romero
  • Régis Céréghino
  • Céline Leroy
  • Olivier Dézerald
  • Diane S. Srivastava

The scientist has published frequently in these venues:

  • Nature Communications (2 publications)
  • Ecography (2 publications)
  • Functional Ecology (2 publications)
  • Marine and Freshwater Research (2 publications)
  • Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia (2 publications)

The primary field of study is Environmental Science, with emphasis on the following subfields:

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecological Modeling
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Oceanography

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems

Best Publications

  • High taxonomic variability despite stable functional structure across microbial communities

    Stilianos Louca;Saulo M S Jacques;Aliny P F Pires;Juliana S Leal

  • Dissolved humic substances – ecological driving forces from the individual to the ecosystem level?

    Christian E. W. Steinberg;Sheku Kamara;Valeria Yu. Prokhotskaya;Valeria Yu. Prokhotskaya;Levonas Manusadzianas

  • Early stage litter decomposition across biomes

    Ika Djukic;Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas;Inger Kappel Schmidt;Klaus Steenberg Larsen

  • Ecological determinism increases with organism size.

    Vinicius F. Farjalla;Diane S. Srivastava;Nicholas A. C. Marino;Fernanda D. Azevedo

  • Neotropical coastal lagoons: an appraisal of their biodiversity, functioning, threats and conservation management.

    F. A. Esteves;A. Caliman;J. M. Santangelo;R. D. Guariento

  • Synergy of Fresh and Accumulated Organic Matter to Bacterial Growth

    Vinícius Fortes Farjalla;Claudio C. Marinho;Bias Marçal de Faria;Bias Marçal de Faria;André Megali Amado

  • Extreme rainfall events alter the trophic structure in bromeliad tanks across the Neotropics

    Gustavo Q Romero;Nicholas A C Marino;A Andrew M MacDonald;Régis Céréghino

  • DOC removal paradigms in highly humic aquatic ecosystems

    Vinicius F. Farjalla;André M. Amado;André M. Amado;Albert L. Suhett;Frederico Meirelles-Pereira

  • Correlates of zooplankton beta diversity in tropical lake systems.

    Paloma M. Lopes;Luis M. Bini;Steven A. J. Declerck;Vinicius F. Farjalla

  • Complementary pathways of dissolved organic carbon removal pathways in clear-water Amazonian ecosystems: photochemical degradation and bacterial uptake

    André M. Amado;Vinicius F. Farjalla;Francisco de A. Esteves;Reinaldo L. Bozelli

  • Nutrient limitation of bacterial production in clear water Amazonian ecosystems

    Vinicius F. Farjalla;Francisco A. Esteves;Reinaldo L. Bozelli;Fábio Roland

  • Climate change in Brazil: perspective on the biogeochemistry of inland waters

    F Roland;V L M Huszar;Vf Farjalla;A Enrich-Prast

  • Influence of Hydrological Pulse on Bacterial Growth and DOC Uptake in a Clear-Water Amazonian Lake

    Vinicius F. Farjalla;Debora A. Azevedo;Francisco A. Esteves;Reinaldo L. Bozelli

  • Temporal coherence among tropical coastal lagoons: a search for patterns and mechanisms.

    A. Caliman;A. Caliman;L. S. Carneiro;L. S. Carneiro;J. M. Santangelo;J. M. Santangelo;R. D. Guariento

  • The prominence of and biases in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research

    Adriano Caliman;Adriano Caliman;Aliny F. Pires;Francisco A. Esteves;Reinaldo L. Bozelli

  • Interactive effects of climate change and biodiversity loss on ecosystem functioning.

    Aliny P. F. Pires;Aliny P. F. Pires;Diane S. Srivastava;Nicholas A. C. Marino;A. Andrew M. MacDonald

  • Tropical freshwater ecosystems have lower bacterial growth efficiency than temperate ones

    André Megali Amado;Frederico Meirelles-Pereira;Luciana De Oliveira Vidal Vidal;Hugo Sarmento Sarmento

  • Dominant predators mediate the impact of habitat size on trophic structure in bromeliad invertebrate communities

    Jana S. Petermann;Vinicius F. Farjalla;Merlijn Jocque;Merlijn Jocque;Pavel Kratina

  • The Combination of Different Carbon Sources Enhances Bacterial Growth Efficiency in Aquatic Ecosystems

    Ellen S. Fonte;André M. Amado;André M. Amado;Frederico Meirelles-Pereira;Francisco A. Esteves

  • Functional structure of the bromeliad tank microbiome is strongly shaped by local geochemical conditions

    Stilianos Louca;Saulo M. S. Jacques;Aliny P. F. Pires;Juliana S. Leal

  • Photochemical reactivity of aquatic macrophyte leachates: abiotic transformations and bacterial response

    Vinicius F. Farjalla;Alexandre M. Anesio;Stefan Bertilsson;Wilhelm Granéli

  • The relationship between DOC and planktonic bacteria in tropical coastal lagoons

    Vinicius F. Farjalla;Bias M. Faria;Francisco A. Esteves

  • Environmental factors driving phytoplankton taxonomic and functional diversity in Amazonian floodplain lakes

    Simone J. Cardoso;João Carlos Nabout;Vinicius F. Farjalla;Paloma M. Lopes

Frequent Co-Authors

Diane S. Srivastava
Diane S. Srivastava University of British Columbia
Gustavo Q. Romero
Gustavo Q. Romero State University of Campinas
Régis Céréghino
Régis Céréghino Paul Sabatier University
Bruno Corbara
Bruno Corbara University of Clermont Auvergne
Alex Enrich-Prast
Alex Enrich-Prast Linköping University
Fábio Roland
Fábio Roland Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
John M. Melack
John M. Melack University of California, Santa Barbara
Pavel Kratina
Pavel Kratina Queen Mary University of London
Bruce R. Forsberg
Bruce R. Forsberg National Institute of Amazonian Research
Benjamin Gilbert
Benjamin Gilbert University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Ecology and Evolution often involves interdisciplinary knowledge and specialized credentials. For students seeking flexible learning options, online degrees in related fields can offer both affordability and accessibility.

Cost is an important consideration. For those interested in a broad approach, comparing online interdisciplinary studies tuition costs can help you select budget-friendly programs that cover several fields relevant to ecological and evolutionary careers.

If you are considering teaching, discovering the most affordable online master's in education can make it feasible to pursue a teaching career without excessive student debt.

Valuable roles in research and information management may require library science training. Understanding the cost of mlis degree us is useful for those planning a data-oriented or academic path.

Lastly, for careers combining science and communication, speech-language pathology is another rewarding area. You can review asha accredited online slp programs to ensure your credentials will meet industry standards.

By understanding these pathways and their associated costs, you can make informed choices about your educational investment and future career.

Best Scientists Citing Vinicius F. Farjalla

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles