World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
31
Citations
5981
World Ranking
9650
National Ranking
107

Tomas Bohr publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomas Bohr sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 172 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Tomas Bohr D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomas Bohr sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For insightful analysis of and experiments on nonlinear fluid dynamical problems, including turbulence, freesurface flows, granular dynamics, and biological flows

Overview

Tomas Bohr is affiliated with the Technical University of Denmark in Denmark. Their research primarily spans the field of Engineering, with a significant focus on Plant Science, Civil and Structural Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Computational Mechanics, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist's work addresses various topics, including:

  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid and Hydrocephalus
  • Plant Nutrient Uptake and Metabolism
  • Plant Responses to Water Stress
  • Hydraulic Flow and Structures
  • Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Recent notable papers include:

  • The glymphatic system: Current understanding and modeling (2022, iScience)
  • Astrocyte endfeet may theoretically act as valves to convert pressure oscillations to glymphatic flow (2023, Journal of The Royal Society Interface)
  • The mechanism of sugar export from long conifer needles (2021, New Phytologist)
  • Tracing the opposing assimilate and nutrient flows in live conifer needles (2023, Journal of Experimental Botany)
  • Relieving the transfusion tissue traffic jam: a network model of radial transport in conifer needles (2024, New Phytologist)

Frequent coauthors in their work include Chen Gao, Alexander Schulz, Peter A. R. Bork, Maiken Nedergaard, and Sean Marker.

Some of the common publication venues where this scientist's research appears are:

  • New Phytologist
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • iScience
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface
  • Journal of Experimental Botany

Tomas Bohr was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Physical Society (APS) in 2009. The citation for this recognition highlights insightful analysis and experiments on nonlinear fluid dynamical problems, including turbulence, free-surface flows, granular dynamics, and biological flows.

Best Publications

  • Dynamical Systems Approach to Turbulence

    Tomas Bohr;Mogens H. Jensen;Giovanni Paladin;Angelo Vulpiani

  • Transition to chaos by interaction of resonances in dissipative systems. I: Circle maps

    Mogens Hϕgh Jensen;Per Bak;Tomas Bohr

  • Vortex wakes of a flapping foil

    Teis Schnipper;Anders Peter Andersen;Tomas Bohr

  • Transition to chaos by interaction of resonances in dissipative systems. II. Josephson junctions, charge-density waves, and standard maps

    Tomas Bohr;Per Bak;Mogens Hϕgh Jensen

  • Shallow-water approach to the circular hydraulic jump

    Tomas Bohr;Peter Dimon;Vakhtang Putkaradze

  • Sap flow and sugar transport in plants

    Kaare Hartvig Jensen;Kirstine Berg-Sørensen;Henrik Bruus;N. M. Holbrook

  • Wake structure and thrust generation of a flapping foil in two-dimensional flow

    Anders Peter Andersen;Tomas Bohr;Teis Schnipper;Jens Honore Walther

  • Unifying model of shoot gravitropism reveals proprioception as a central feature of posture control in plants

    Renaud Bastien;Tomas Bohr;Bruno Moulia;Bruno Moulia;Stéphane Douady

  • Dynamic scaling and crossover analysis for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation.

    K Sneppen;J Krug;MH Jensen;C Jayaprakash;C Jayaprakash

  • Polygons on a Rotating Fluid Surface

    Thomas R. N. Jansson;Thomas R. N. Jansson;Martin P. Haspang;Martin P. Haspang;Kåre H. Jensen;Kåre H. Jensen;Pascal Hersen

  • Mode-Locking and the Transition to Chaos in Dissipative Systems

    Per Bak;Tomas Bohr;Mogens Høgh Jensen

  • Anatomy of a bathtub vortex.

    Anders Peter Andersen;Tomas Bohr;Bjarne Stenum;Jens Juul Rasmussen

  • Averaging Theory for the Structure of Hydraulic Jumps and Separation in Laminar Free-Surface Flows

    Tomas Bohr;Vachtang Putkaradze;Shinya Watanabe

  • Creating corners in kitchen sinks

    Clive Ellegaard;Adam Espe Hansen;Anders Haaning;Kim Hansen

  • Phase diagrams of surface structures from Bethe-ansatz solutions of the quantum sine-Gordon model

    Frederick D. Haldane;Frederick D. Haldane;P. Bak;T. Bohr

  • Coherence, Chaos, and Broken Symmetry in Classical, Many-Body Dynamical Systems

    Tomas Bohr;G. Grinstein;Yu He;C. Jayaprakash

  • Modeling the Hydrodynamics of Phloem Sieve Plates

    Kaare Hartvig Jensen;Kaare Hartvig Jensen;Daniel Leroy Mullendore;Noel Michele Holbrook;Tomas Bohr

  • Pattern formation: Instabilities in sand ripples.

    Jonas Lundbek Hansen;Martin van Hecke;Anders Haaning;Clive Ellegaard

  • Nucleation and transients at the onset of vortex turbulence.

    Greg Huber;Preben Alstrom;Tomas Bohr

  • Mechanisms and feasibility of prey capture in ambush-feeding zooplankton.

    Thomas Kiørboe;Anders Andersen;Vincent J. Langlois;Hans Henrik Jakobsen

  • The bathtub vortex in a rotating container

    Anders Peter Andersen;Tomas Bohr;B. Stenum;J. Juul Rasmussen

Frequent Co-Authors

Henrik Bruus
Henrik Bruus Technical University of Denmark
Alexander Schulz
Alexander Schulz University of Copenhagen
Ken Haste Andersen
Ken Haste Andersen Technical University of Denmark
Maciej A. Zwieniecki
Maciej A. Zwieniecki University of California, Davis
Thomas Kiørboe
Thomas Kiørboe Technical University of Denmark
Martin van Hecke
Martin van Hecke Leiden University
Daniel Bonn
Daniel Bonn University of Amsterdam
Edward Ott
Edward Ott University of Maryland, College Park
Christophe Clanet
Christophe Clanet École Polytechnique
Maxim Bazhenov
Maxim Bazhenov University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Engineering and technology students often seek flexible education and diverse career options. Fortunately, there are a growing number of online programs that make advancing your qualifications more accessible and affordable. For those interested in management roles, several reputable online MBA programs no GMAT requirement allow you to fast-track your education without standardized testing hurdles.

Budget-conscious students can also explore an online MBA under $30k, giving you the business expertise valued in tech-driven industries without excessive debt. For those looking to pivot into growing digital sectors, a bachelors in social media marketing can open doors in tech companies and startups as digital skills remain in high demand.

Additionally, individuals interested in the expanding leisure and service sectors should consider an online hospitality management program. This field increasingly leverages technology for operations and innovation. Online degrees let you balance study and work, offering new career paths whether you stay in engineering or branch into business, digital marketing, or hospitality management.

Best Scientists Citing Tomas Bohr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles