World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
6343
World Ranking
12022
National Ranking
594

Thorsten Koch publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thorsten Koch sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 161 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Thorsten Koch D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thorsten Koch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1995 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to the understanding and demonstration of novel optoelectronic devices and circuits.

Overview

Thorsten Koch is affiliated with the Zuse Institute Berlin in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of Engineering and Computer Science.

Their research spans several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Computer Networks and Communications.

The main topics of their work include Integrated Energy Systems Optimization, Formal Methods in Verification, Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods, Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research, Energy Load and Power Forecasting, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, and Advanced Control Systems Optimization.

Thorsten Koch has been involved in multiple recent research publications. Some of these are:

  • "MIPLIB 2017: data-driven compilation of the 6th mixed-integer programming library" (2021) in Mathematical Programming Computation
  • "Challenges and opportunities in quantum optimization" (2024) in Nature Reviews Physics
  • "The SCIP Optimization Suite 9.0" (2024) in Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • "Progress in mathematical programming solvers from 2001 to 2020" (2022) in EURO Journal on Computational Optimization
  • "Enabling Research through the SCIP Optimization Suite 8.0" (2023) in ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software

Frequent co-authors of Thorsten Koch include Mark Turner, Daniel Rehfeldt, Mathieu Besançon, Yuji Shinano, and Thi Thai Le.

They have published predominantly in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), SSRN Electronic Journal, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Physics of Fluids, and Mathematical Programming Computation.

Thorsten Koch has also authored books with publishers including Springer International Publishing and Mohr Siebeck eBooks. Notable titles include "Mathematical Optimization for Efficient and Robust Energy Networks" (2021) and "Der Grundrechtsschutz des Drittbetroffenen" (2020).

Their recognized contributions extend to awards such as being named an IEEE Fellow in 1995 for contributions to the understanding and demonstration of novel optoelectronic devices and circuits.

Best Publications

  • Branching rules revisited

    Tobias Achterberg;Thorsten Koch;Alexander Martin

  • Constraint integer programming: a new approach to integrate CP and MIP

    Tobias Achterberg;Timo Berthold;Thorsten Koch;Kati Wolter

  • MIPLIB 2010 - Mixed Integer Programming Library version 5

    Thorsten Koch;Tobias Achterberg;Erling Andersen;Oliver Bastert

  • Solving Steiner Tree Problems in Graphs to Optimality

    Thorsten Koch;Alexander Martin

  • MIPLIB 2003

    Tobias Achterberg;Thorsten Koch;Alexander Martin

  • The SCIP Optimization Suite 5.0

    Ambros M. Gleixner;Leon Eifler;Tristan Gally;Gerald Gamrath

  • The SCIP Optimization Suite 6.0

    Ambros M. Gleixner;Michael Bastubbe;Leon Eifler;Tristan Gally

  • Evaluating Gas Network Capacities

    Thorsten Koch;Benjamin Hiller;Marc E. Pfetsch;Lars Schewe

  • SteinLib: An Updated Library on Steiner Tree Problems in Graphs

    Thorsten Koch;Alexander Martin;Stefan Voß

  • The SCIP Optimization Suite 7.0

    Gerald Gamrath;Daniel Anderson;Ksenia Bestuzheva;Wei-Kun Chen

  • MIPLIB 2017: data-driven compilation of the 6th mixed-integer programming library

    Ambros M. Gleixner;Gregor Hendel;Gerald Gamrath;Tobias Achterberg

  • Validation of nominations in gas network optimization: models, methods, and solutions

    Marc E. Pfetsch;Armin Fügenschuh;Björn Geißler;Nina Geißler

  • Rapid Mathematical Programming

    Thorsten Koch

  • The SCIP Optimization Suite 3.2

    Gerald Gamrath;Tobias Fischer;Tristan Gally;Ambros M. Gleixner

  • GasLib—A Library of Gas Network Instances

    Martin Schmidt;Denis Aßmann;Robert Burlacu;Jesco Humpola

  • Optimizing the landside operation of a container terminal

    Gary Froyland;Thorsten Koch;Nicole Megow;Emily Duane

  • The SCIP Optimization Suite 4.0

    Stephen J. Maher;Tobias Fischer;Tristan Gally;Gerald Gamrath

  • ParaSCIP: a parallel extension of SCIP

    Yuji Shinano;Tobias Achterberg;Timo Berthold;Stefan Heinz

  • Modelling Feasible Network Configurations for UMTS

    Andreas Eisenblätter;Roland Wessäly;Alexander Martin;Armin Fügenschuh

  • A hybrid branch-and-bound approach for exact rational mixed-integer programming

    William J. Cook;Thorsten Koch;Daniel E. Steffy;Kati Wolter

  • The final NETLIB-LP results

    Thorsten Koch

  • Progress in mathematical programming solvers from 2001 to 2020

    Unknown

  • An updated library on Steiner tree problems in graphs

    T. Koch;A. Martin;S. Voß

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex Martin
Alex Martin National Institutes of Health
Ben Fabry
Ben Fabry University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
James P. Butler
James P. Butler Harvard University
Richard I. Kelley
Richard I. Kelley Kennedy Krieger Institute
Rüdiger Schultz
Rüdiger Schultz University of Duisburg-Essen
Andrea Lodi
Andrea Lodi Cornell University
Werner Römisch
Werner Römisch Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
William J. Cook
William J. Cook University of Waterloo
Alejandro A. Schäffer
Alejandro A. Schäffer National Institutes of Health
Leslie G. Biesecker
Leslie G. Biesecker National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of education and career options. Many students start to ask, “what can I do with an environmental science degree” as they consider the intersection of technology and environmental solutions. With the rise of flexible learning, you can even pursue an accelerated computer science degree online to quickly enter the job market or advance your expertise.

Online engineering programs are also expanding. For those interested in sustainability and technology, consider an online environmental engineering degree. If you are curious about manufacturing, robotics, or mechanical systems, a cheapest online master's mechanical engineering program may be a strategic fit.

These related online degrees not only broaden your technical knowledge but also expand your career pathways into growing fields. Online study offers flexibility, affordability, and the chance to tailor your learning to your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Thorsten Koch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles