World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 36 2569 2406 88 85 210 4416

Jamal Naser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jamal Naser between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jamal Naser published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2010. 19 of the 227 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2010. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 8 publications
1972 2025

227 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jamal Naser: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 4
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 3
2001 8
2002 8
2003 8
2004 7
2005 2
2006 3
2007 4
2008 7
2009 13
2010 16
2011 16
2012 11
2013 16
2014 6
2015 11
2016 12
2017 11
2018 12
2019 3
2020 7
2021 3
2022 6
2023 7
2024 11
2025 8
Total 227
Download as CSV

Jamal Naser publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamal Naser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 207–216 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 210 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125 210
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Jamal Naser D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamal Naser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139 36
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jamal Naser is affiliated with Swinburne University of Technology in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on engineering, with a substantial publication record in computational mechanics, mechanical engineering, ocean engineering, biomedical engineering, and aerospace engineering. The main thematic areas of their work include granular flow and fluidized beds, particle dynamics in fluid flows, combustion and flame dynamics, Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization, metallurgical processes and thermodynamics, thermochemical biomass conversion processes, and iron and steelmaking processes.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jamal Naser include Geoffrey Brooks, A.R. Sarhan, Nazmul Huda, Md. Rezwanul Karim, and David Dodds. These collaborators have contributed to various research projects that span multiple aspects of fluid dynamics, combustion, and particle systems.

The scientist has published extensively, with a notable presence in several academic venues. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)
  • Energies
  • Fluids
  • Preprints.org
  • Powder Technology

Recent papers authored by or involving Jamal Naser cover a range of topics related to fluidized bed technology, computational fluid dynamics, and aerodynamic properties, including:

  • Numerical modelling of a bubbling fluidized bed combustion: A simplified approach (2020), published in Fuel
  • CFD modelling of coal gasification in a fluidized bed with the effects of calcination under different operating conditions (2021), published in Energy
  • An experimental and computational study of aerodynamic properties of rugby balls (2024), published in Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)
  • COVID-19 aerodynamic evaluation of social distancing in indoor environments, a numerical study (2021), published in Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering
  • Fluidized bed CFD using simplified solid-phase coupling (2020), published in Powder Technology

Jamal Naser's work often intersects with applied and theoretical aspects of engineering disciplines. The detailed investigations into granular flows and particle-fluid interactions suggest a comprehensive approach to understanding both practical and theoretical challenges in fluidized bed systems and related fields.

Best Publications

  • CFD modelling of co-firing of biomass with coal under oxy-fuel combustion in a large scale power plant

    Arafat A. Bhuiyan;Jamal Naser

  • CFD modelling of air-fired and oxy-fuel combustion in a large-scale furnace at Loy Yang A brown coal power station

    Audai Hussein Al-Abbas;Jamal Naser;David Dodds

  • CFD modelling of air-fired and oxy-fuel combustion of lignite in a 100 KW furnace

    Audai Hussein Al-Abbas;Jamal Naser;David Dodds

  • A review on thermo-chemical characteristics of coal/biomass co-firing in industrial furnace

    Arafat A. Bhuiyan;Arafat A. Bhuiyan;Aaron S. Blicblau;A.K.M. Sadrul Islam;Jamal Naser

  • Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Supersonic Oxygen Jet Behavior at Steelmaking Temperature

    Morshed Alam;Jamal Naser;Geoffrey Brooks

  • Computational modelling of co-firing of biomass with coal under oxy-fuel condition in a small scale furnace

    Arafat A. Bhuiyan;Jamal Naser

  • Numerical modelling of oxy fuel combustion, the effect of radiative and convective heat transfer and burnout

    Arafat A. Bhuiyan;Jamal Naser

  • Numerical simulation of brown coal combustion in a 550 MW tangentially-fired furnace under different operating conditions

    Audai Hussein Al-Abbas;Jamal Naser;Emad Kamil Hussein

  • Simulation of smoke from a burning vehicle and pollution levels caused by traffic jam in a road tunnel

    S. Bari;Jamal A. Naser

  • Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Supersonic Coherent Jets for Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Process

    Morshed Alam;Jamal Naser;Geoffrey Brooks;Andrea Fontana

  • CFD simulation on influence of suspended solid particles on bubbles' coalescence rate in flotation cell

    A.R. Sarhan;A.R. Sarhan;J. Naser;G. Brooks

  • Effect of chemical reaction mechanisms and NOx modeling on air-fired and oxy-fuel combustion of lignite in a 100-kW furnace

    Audai Hussein Al-Abbas;Jamal Naser

  • CFD modelling of combustion and associated emission of wet woody biomass in a 4 MW moving grate boiler

    Md. Rezwanul Karim;Md. Rezwanul Karim;Jamal Naser

  • A Computational Fluid Dynamics Model of Shrouded Supersonic Jet Impingement on a Water Surface

    Morshed Alam;Jamal Naser;Geoffrey Brooks;Andrea Fontana

  • An unequal granular temperature kinetic theory : description of granular flow with multiple particle classes

    M.F. Rahaman;Jamal Naser;P.J. Witt

  • Simulation of airflow and pollution levels caused by severe traffic jam in a road tunnel

    S. Bari;J. Naser

  • Numerical investigation of full scale coal combustion model of tangentially fired boiler with the effect of mill ducting

    Daniela Achim;J. Naser;Y. S. Morsi;S. Pascoe

  • CFD modeling of bubble column: Influence of physico-chemical properties of the gas/liquid phases properties on bubble formation

    A.R. Sarhan;A.R. Sarhan;J. Naser;G. Brooks

  • Effects of particle size and concentration on bubble coalescence and froth formation in a slurry bubble column

    A.R. Sarhan;A.R. Sarhan;J. Naser;G. Brooks

  • Inclined jetting and splashing in electric arc furnace steelmaking

    Morshed Alam;Gordon Irons;Geoffrey Brooks;Andrea Fontana

Frequent Co-Authors

Monzur Alam Imteaz
Monzur Alam Imteaz Swinburne University of Technology
Markus A. Reuter
Markus A. Reuter Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf
Simon C. Watkins
Simon C. Watkins University of Pittsburgh
Fumihiko Imamura
Fumihiko Imamura Tohoku University
Mohammad. Rasul
Mohammad. Rasul Central Queensland University
Neil M. Ribe
Neil M. Ribe University of Paris-Saclay
Victor Vilarrasa
Victor Vilarrasa Spanish National Research Council
Traian Iliescu
Traian Iliescu Virginia Tech
Anastasios J. Karabelas
Anastasios J. Karabelas The Centre for Research and Technology Hellas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens numerous career paths, but many students also explore related fields through online programs. For example, some consider pursuing degrees that focus on counseling or behavioral health, appealing to those interested in human factors and team dynamics within engineering environments. Exploring the easiest counseling degree programs can help prospective students find accessible routes into this complementary field.

Accelerated programs like the accelerated aba program offer a fast-track to mastering applied behavior analysis, which can be valuable for engineers interested in improving human-machine interfaces or workplace behavior.

For those exploring speech pathology as a secondary career or interest, understanding “how many slp grad schools should i apply to” can be crucial for increasing acceptance chances and career flexibility. Resources that guide applicants through the process, such as how many slp grad schools should i apply to, provide strategic insights for prospective students.

Additionally, students curious about alternative career options might review information on the easiest slp programs to get into. This can inform decisions about balancing engineering aspirations with accessible education paths in speech-language pathology.

Best Scientists Citing Jamal Naser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles