World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas W. Teasdale

Thomas W. Teasdale

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
9905
World Ranking
6134
National Ranking
20

Thomas W. Teasdale publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Teasdale sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Thomas W. Teasdale D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Teasdale sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas W. Teasdale is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research spans several key fields, including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Psychology, and Mathematics. Within these areas, their work touches on specific subfields such as Genetics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Mathematics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Geometry and Topology.

The scientific contributions of Thomas W. Teasdale focus on diverse topics, primarily in cognitive and genetic domains. These include:

  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Point processes and geometric inequalities
  • Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
  • Morphological variations and asymmetry

Their recent published papers cover notable aspects of intelligence trends and brain science, reflecting interests at the intersection of psychology, genetics, and neurodevelopment. Selected papers include:

  • The secular trend of intelligence test scores: The Danish experience for young men born between 1940 and 2000, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Is There a Correlation Between the Number of Brain Cells and IQ?, 2020, Cerebral Cortex
  • The secular trend of intelligence test scores in the present century: The Danish experience, 2021, Intelligence

These publications examine longitudinal intelligence trends using Danish population data and explore neurobiological correlates of IQ. The venues in which Thomas W. Teasdale frequently publishes include:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Intelligence

Collaboration is a feature of their scientific work. Frequent co-authors include Emilie Rune Hegelund, Lonny Stokholm, Merete Osler, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, and Kaare Christensen, indicating interdisciplinary teamwork across epidemiology, genetics, and cognitive science.

Best Publications

  • An adoption study of human obesity.

    Albert J. Stunkard;Thorkild I.A. Sørensen;Thorkild I.A. Sørensen;Thorkild I.A. Sørensen;Craig Hanis;Craig Hanis;Craig Hanis;Thomas W. Teasdale;Thomas W. Teasdale;Thomas W. Teasdale

  • Genetic and environmental influences on premature death in adult adoptees

    Thorkild I.A. Sørensen;Gert G. Nielsen;Per Kragh Andersen;Thomas W. Teasdale

  • Suicide after traumatic brain injury: a population study

    T W Teasdale;A W Engberg

  • Perinatal complications and clinical outcome within the schizophrenia spectrum.

    J. Parnas;F. Schulsinger;T. W. Teasdale;H. Schulsinger

  • Behavioral precursors of schizophrenia spectrum: A prospective study.

    Josef Parnas;Fini Schulsinger;Hanne Schulsinger;Sarnoff A. Mednick

  • Subjective experience in brain-injured patients and their close relatives : A European Brain Injury Questionnaire study

    Thomas W. Teasdale;Anne-Lise Christensen;Klaus Willmes;Gérard Deloche

  • Secular declines in cognitive test scores: A reversal of the Flynn Effect

    Thomas W. Teasdale;David R. Owen

  • Heredity and familial environment in intelligence and educational level—a sibling study

    T. W. Teasdale;David R. Owen

  • Psychometric Properties of the Danish Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: The SDQ Assessed for More than 70,000 Raters in Four Different Cohorts

    Unknown

  • A prospective study of young men at high risk for alcoholism: school behavior and achievement.

    Joachim Knop;Thomas W. Teasdale;Fini Schulsinger;Donald W. Goodwin

  • Psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury in adults: a long-term population-based follow-up.

    A. W. Engberg;T. W. Teasdale

  • A long-term rise and recent decline in intelligence test performance: The Flynn Effect in reverse

    Thomas W. Teasdale;David R. Owen

  • Cerebral ventricular size in the offspring of schizophrenic mothers. A preliminary study.

    Fini Schulsinger;Josef Parnas;Erling T. Petersen;Hanne Schulsinger

  • Intelligence as measured by the WAIS and a military draft board group test

    E. L. Mortensen;J. M. Reinisch;T. W. Teasdale

  • Continuing secular increases in intelligence and a stable prevalence of high intelligence levels

    T.W. Teasdale;David R. Owen

  • A prospective study of young men at high risk for alcoholism: neuropsychological assessment.

    Kirsten Drejer;Alice Theikjaard;Thomas W. Teasdale;Fini Schulsinger

  • Suicide after a stroke: a population study

    Thomas William Teasdale;Aase W. Engberg

  • The Danish draft board's intelligence test, Børge Priens Prøve: psychometric properties and research applications through 50 years.

    Thomas W. Teasdale

  • Forty-Year Secular Trends in Cognitive Abilties

    T.W Teasdale;David R Owen

  • A prospective study of young men at high risk for alcoholism. Social and psychological characteristics.

    F Schulsinger;J Knop;D W Goodwin;T W Teasdale

  • The Copenhagen high-risk project. The diagnosis of maternal schizophrenia and its relation to offspring diagnosis.

    Å. Jørgensen;Thomas W. Teasdale;Josef Parnas;Fini Schulsinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Josef Parnas
Josef Parnas University of Copenhagen
Albert J. Stunkard
Albert J. Stunkard University of Pennsylvania
Sarnoff A. Mednick
Sarnoff A. Mednick University of Southern California
Klaus Willmes
Klaus Willmes RWTH Aachen University
Bente Pakkenberg
Bente Pakkenberg University of Copenhagen
Barbara A. Wilson
Barbara A. Wilson St George's, University of London
Thorkild I. A. Sørensen
Thorkild I. A. Sørensen University of Copenhagen
Mark A. Klebanoff
Mark A. Klebanoff The Ohio State University
Merete Osler
Merete Osler University of Copenhagen
Alexandre Castro-Caldas
Alexandre Castro-Caldas Catholic University of Portugal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online psychology degree opens the door to diverse career paths, including counseling, therapy, and research. Many students are especially interested in becoming marriage and family therapists (MFTs), a growing field with unique requirements depending on location.

For example, those researching how to become a marriage and family therapist in Greensboro will find specific educational and licensing steps that may vary from other cities. It’s important to be aware of local guidelines; Henderson mft certification requirements and mft requirements in Honolulu offer distinct information for students in each region.

Additionally, choosing the right online degree is essential in meeting prerequisites like those outlined in Houston mft education requirements. Consider programs that are accredited and align with your state’s regulations to ensure a smooth path toward licensure and professional success.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas W. Teasdale

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles