World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas W. Teasdale

Thomas W. Teasdale

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6134 5701 20 20 126 9905

Thomas W. Teasdale publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas W. Teasdale between 1979 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas W. Teasdale published across 43 years, from 1979 to 2021, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2006. 4 of the 136 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2006. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 5 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications
1979 2021

136 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas W. Teasdale: publications per year, 1979 to 2021
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 1
1981 2
1982 3
1983 3
1984 5
1985 3
1986 5
1987 3
1988 7
1989 3
1990 0
1991 4
1992 1
1993 5
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 3
1998 2
1999 0
2000 3
2001 4
2002 2
2003 2
2004 4
2005 5
2006 8
2007 7
2008 3
2009 5
2010 1
2011 4
2012 4
2013 8
2014 7
2015 0
2016 5
2017 3
2018 0
2019 2
2020 1
2021 3
Total 136
Download as CSV

Thomas W. Teasdale publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Teasdale sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 126
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas W. Teasdale D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Teasdale sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas W. Teasdale is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research spans several key fields, including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Psychology, and Mathematics. Within these areas, their work touches on specific subfields such as Genetics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Mathematics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Geometry and Topology.

The scientific contributions of Thomas W. Teasdale focus on diverse topics, primarily in cognitive and genetic domains. These include:

  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Point processes and geometric inequalities
  • Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
  • Morphological variations and asymmetry

Their recent published papers cover notable aspects of intelligence trends and brain science, reflecting interests at the intersection of psychology, genetics, and neurodevelopment. Selected papers include:

  • The secular trend of intelligence test scores: The Danish experience for young men born between 1940 and 2000, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Is There a Correlation Between the Number of Brain Cells and IQ?, 2020, Cerebral Cortex
  • The secular trend of intelligence test scores in the present century: The Danish experience, 2021, Intelligence

These publications examine longitudinal intelligence trends using Danish population data and explore neurobiological correlates of IQ. The venues in which Thomas W. Teasdale frequently publishes include:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Intelligence

Collaboration is a feature of their scientific work. Frequent co-authors include Emilie Rune Hegelund, Lonny Stokholm, Merete Osler, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, and Kaare Christensen, indicating interdisciplinary teamwork across epidemiology, genetics, and cognitive science.

Best Publications

  • An adoption study of human obesity.

    Albert J. Stunkard;Thorkild I.A. Sørensen;Thorkild I.A. Sørensen;Thorkild I.A. Sørensen;Craig Hanis;Craig Hanis;Craig Hanis;Thomas W. Teasdale;Thomas W. Teasdale;Thomas W. Teasdale

  • Genetic and environmental influences on premature death in adult adoptees

    Thorkild I.A. Sørensen;Gert G. Nielsen;Per Kragh Andersen;Thomas W. Teasdale

  • Suicide after traumatic brain injury: a population study

    T W Teasdale;A W Engberg

  • Perinatal complications and clinical outcome within the schizophrenia spectrum.

    J. Parnas;F. Schulsinger;T. W. Teasdale;H. Schulsinger

  • Behavioral precursors of schizophrenia spectrum: A prospective study.

    Josef Parnas;Fini Schulsinger;Hanne Schulsinger;Sarnoff A. Mednick

  • Subjective experience in brain-injured patients and their close relatives : A European Brain Injury Questionnaire study

    Thomas W. Teasdale;Anne-Lise Christensen;Klaus Willmes;Gérard Deloche

  • Secular declines in cognitive test scores: A reversal of the Flynn Effect

    Thomas W. Teasdale;David R. Owen

  • Heredity and familial environment in intelligence and educational level—a sibling study

    T. W. Teasdale;David R. Owen

  • Psychometric Properties of the Danish Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: The SDQ Assessed for More than 70,000 Raters in Four Different Cohorts

    Unknown

  • A prospective study of young men at high risk for alcoholism: school behavior and achievement.

    Joachim Knop;Thomas W. Teasdale;Fini Schulsinger;Donald W. Goodwin

  • Psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury in adults: a long-term population-based follow-up.

    A. W. Engberg;T. W. Teasdale

  • A long-term rise and recent decline in intelligence test performance: The Flynn Effect in reverse

    Thomas W. Teasdale;David R. Owen

  • Cerebral ventricular size in the offspring of schizophrenic mothers. A preliminary study.

    Fini Schulsinger;Josef Parnas;Erling T. Petersen;Hanne Schulsinger

  • Intelligence as measured by the WAIS and a military draft board group test

    E. L. Mortensen;J. M. Reinisch;T. W. Teasdale

  • Continuing secular increases in intelligence and a stable prevalence of high intelligence levels

    T.W. Teasdale;David R. Owen

  • A prospective study of young men at high risk for alcoholism: neuropsychological assessment.

    Kirsten Drejer;Alice Theikjaard;Thomas W. Teasdale;Fini Schulsinger

  • Suicide after a stroke: a population study

    Thomas William Teasdale;Aase W. Engberg

  • The Danish draft board's intelligence test, Børge Priens Prøve: psychometric properties and research applications through 50 years.

    Thomas W. Teasdale

  • Forty-Year Secular Trends in Cognitive Abilties

    T.W Teasdale;David R Owen

  • A prospective study of young men at high risk for alcoholism. Social and psychological characteristics.

    F Schulsinger;J Knop;D W Goodwin;T W Teasdale

  • The Copenhagen high-risk project. The diagnosis of maternal schizophrenia and its relation to offspring diagnosis.

    Å. Jørgensen;Thomas W. Teasdale;Josef Parnas;Fini Schulsinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Josef Parnas
Josef Parnas University of Copenhagen
Albert J. Stunkard
Albert J. Stunkard University of Pennsylvania
Sarnoff A. Mednick
Sarnoff A. Mednick University of Southern California
Klaus Willmes
Klaus Willmes RWTH Aachen University
Bente Pakkenberg
Bente Pakkenberg University of Copenhagen
Barbara A. Wilson
Barbara A. Wilson St George's, University of London
Thorkild I. A. Sørensen
Thorkild I. A. Sørensen University of Copenhagen
Mark A. Klebanoff
Mark A. Klebanoff The Ohio State University
Merete Osler
Merete Osler University of Copenhagen
Alexandre Castro-Caldas
Alexandre Castro-Caldas Catholic University of Portugal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online psychology degree opens the door to diverse career paths, including counseling, therapy, and research. Many students are especially interested in becoming marriage and family therapists (MFTs), a growing field with unique requirements depending on location.

For example, those researching how to become a marriage and family therapist in Greensboro will find specific educational and licensing steps that may vary from other cities. It’s important to be aware of local guidelines; Henderson mft certification requirements and mft requirements in Honolulu offer distinct information for students in each region.

Additionally, choosing the right online degree is essential in meeting prerequisites like those outlined in Houston mft education requirements. Consider programs that are accredited and align with your state’s regulations to ensure a smooth path toward licensure and professional success.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas W. Teasdale

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles