World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
12944
World Ranking
12493
National Ranking
969

Thomas S. Churcher publications per year

2005: 1 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publications
2005 2026

203 publications in total across all disciplines

Thomas S. Churcher publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas S. Churcher sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 165 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Thomas S. Churcher D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas S. Churcher sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas S. Churcher is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on medicine and agricultural and biological sciences, with significant contributions to public health, environmental and occupational health, infectious diseases, insect science, and molecular biology.

The scientist's work largely addresses topics related to mosquito-borne diseases and control as well as malaria research and control. Additional areas of expertise include insect pest control strategies, viral infections and vectors, insect resistance and genetics, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, and insect symbiosis and bacterial influences.

Thomas S. Churcher has published extensively, with articles appearing frequently in several scientific venues. The top publication venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Research Square (Research Square), Malaria Journal, Parasites & Vectors, and Nature Communications.

Their collaboration network includes frequent co-authors such as Ellie Sherrard-Smith, Ben Lambert, Joseph D. Challenger, Antoine Sanou, and Mark Rowland.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Thomas S. Churcher include:

  • Potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study (2020), published in The Lancet Global Health
  • The potential public health consequences of COVID-19 on malaria in Africa (2020), published in Nature Medicine
  • Anopheles stephensi Mosquitoes as Vectors of Plasmodium vivax and falciparum, Horn of Africa, 2019 (2021), published in Emerging Infectious Diseases
  • A new WHO bottle bioassay method to assess the susceptibility of mosquito vectors to public health insecticides: results from a WHO-coordinated multi-centre study (2023), published in Parasites & Vectors
  • Inferring the epidemiological benefit of indoor vector control interventions against malaria from mosquito data (2022), published in Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • Potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study.

    Alexandra B Hogan;Britta L Jewell;Ellie Sherrard-Smith;Juan F Vesga

  • Reducing Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Transmission in Africa: A Model-Based Evaluation of Intervention Strategies

    Jamie T. Griffin;T. Deirdre Hollingsworth;Lucy C. Okell;Thomas S. Churcher

  • Hitting Hotspots: Spatial Targeting of Malaria for Control and Elimination

    Teun Bousema;Jamie T. Griffin;Robert W. Sauerwein;David L. Smith

  • A novel multiple-stage antimalarial agent that inhibits protein synthesis

    Beatriz Baragaña;Irene Hallyburton;Marcus C. S. Lee;Marcus C. S. Lee;Neil R. Norcross

  • The importance of mosquito behavioural adaptations to malaria control in Africa.

    Michelle L. Gatton;Michelle L. Gatton;Nakul Chitnis;Nakul Chitnis;Thomas Churcher;Martin J. Donnelly

  • Mosquito feeding behavior and how it influences residual malaria transmission across Africa.

    Ellie Sherrard-Smith;Janetta E Skarp;Andrew D Beale;Christen Fornadel

  • River blindness: a success story under threat?

    María-Gloria Basáñez;Sébastien D. S Pion;Thomas S Churcher;Lutz P Breitling

  • Modelling the impact of vector control interventions on Anopheles gambiae population dynamics.

    Michael T. White;Jamie T. Griffin;Thomas S. Churcher;Neil M. Ferguson

  • The impact of pyrethroid resistance on the efficacy and effectiveness of bednets for malaria control in Africa.

    Thomas S Churcher;Natalie Lissenden;Jamie T Griffin;Jamie T Griffin;Eve Worrall

  • Mosquito feeding assays to determine the infectiousness of naturally infected Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte carriers.

    Teun Bousema;Teun Bousema;Rhoel R Dinglasan;Isabelle Morlais;Louis C. Gouagna

  • Predicting mosquito infection from Plasmodium falciparum gametocyte density and estimating the reservoir of infection

    Thomas S Churcher;Teun Bousema;Teun Bousema;Martin Walker;Chris Drakeley

  • Examining the human infectious reservoir for Plasmodium falciparum malaria in areas of differing transmission intensity

    Bronner P. Gonçalves;Melissa C. Kapulu;Melissa C. Kapulu;Patrick Sawa;Wamdaogo M. Guelbéogo

  • Effect of single-dose ivermectin on Onchocerca volvulus : a systematic review and meta-analysis

    María-Gloria Basáñez;Sébastien D S Pion;Eve Boakes;João A N Filipe

  • Measuring the blockade of malaria transmission – An analysis of the Standard Membrane Feeding Assay

    Thomas S. Churcher;Andrew M. Blagborough;Michael Delves;Chandra Ramakrishnan

  • Association between Response to Albendazole Treatment and β-Tubulin Genotype Frequencies in Soil-transmitted Helminths

    Aïssatou Diawara;Carli M. Halpenny;Thomas S. Churcher;Charles Mwandawiro

  • The potential public health consequences of COVID-19 on malaria in Africa.

    Ellie Sherrard-Smith;Alexandra B. Hogan;Arran Hamlet;Oliver J. Watson

  • The Potential Contribution of Mass Treatment to the Control of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria

    Lucy C. Okell;Jamie T. Griffin;Immo Kleinschmidt;T. Déirdre Hollingsworth

  • Persistence of the emerging pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis outside the amphibian host greatly increases the probability of host extinction

    Kate M Mitchell;Thomas S Churcher;Trenton W.J Garner;Matthew C Fisher

  • A male and female gametocyte functional viability assay to identify biologically relevant malaria transmission-blocking drugs

    A. Ruecker;D. K. Mathias;U. Straschil;T. S. Churcher

  • Anopheles mortality is both age- and Plasmodium-density dependent: implications for malaria transmission

    Emma J Dawes;Thomas S Churcher;Shijie Zhuang;Robert E Sinden

Frequent Co-Authors

Teun Bousema
Teun Bousema Radboud University
Robert E. Sinden
Robert E. Sinden Imperial College London
Chris Drakeley
Chris Drakeley London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Azra C. Ghani
Azra C. Ghani Imperial College London
Isabelle Morlais
Isabelle Morlais Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Robert W. Sauerwein
Robert W. Sauerwein Radboud University
Roger K. Prichard
Roger K. Prichard McGill University
Kjerstin Lanke
Kjerstin Lanke Radboud University
Roch K. Dabiré
Roch K. Dabiré Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé
Parfait Awono-Ambene
Parfait Awono-Ambene Institut de Recherche pour le Développement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Thomas S. Churcher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles