World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 71 1798 1741 908 873 250 17014

Thomas Moscibroda publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Moscibroda between 2004 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Moscibroda published across 21 years, from 2004 to 2024, averaging 12.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2011. 3 of the 263 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2011. 2004: 11 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications
2004 2024

263 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Moscibroda: publications per year, 2004 to 2024
Year Publications
2004 11
2005 9
2006 11
2007 15
2008 18
2009 22
2010 23
2011 26
2012 12
2013 15
2014 5
2015 17
2016 23
2017 17
2018 8
2019 12
2020 10
2021 5
2022 1
2023 1
2024 2
Total 263
Download as CSV

Thomas Moscibroda publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Moscibroda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 242–251 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 250 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408 250
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Moscibroda D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Moscibroda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192 71
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas Moscibroda is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and has contributed research primarily within the fields of Computer Science and Engineering. Their work largely focuses on areas such as Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems, Optimization and Packing Problems, Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization, Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms, and Network Security and Intrusion Detection.

The scientist's publication record includes multiple papers across various prominent venues. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Toward ML-centric cloud platforms", 2020, Communications of the ACM
  • "Solving the Batch Stochastic Bin Packing Problem in Cloud", 2022, Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
  • "RCInvestigator: Towards Better Investigation of Anomaly Root Causes in Cloud Computing Systems", 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "An Advanced Reinforcement Learning Framework for Online Scheduling of Deferrable Workloads in Cloud Computing", 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

Moscibroda's frequent coauthors include Qingwei Lin (3 publications), Saravan Rajmohan (2 publications), Ricardo Bianchini, Marcus Fontoura, and Eli Cortez. These collaborations span work published in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Communications of the ACM, and the ACM SIGKDD Conference.

They have concentrated research efforts in several subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Information Systems and Management, and Artificial Intelligence. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in the diversity of topics covered in their publications.

Key research topics addressed by Moscibroda encompass:

  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Optimization and Packing Problems
  • Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
  • Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection

The scientist has not been listed with any specific awards or book publications. Their publication record and research interests indicate active engagement with emerging computational technologies and methodologies, particularly in the context of cloud computing infrastructure and optimization challenges.

Best Publications

  • Parallelism-Aware Batch Scheduling: Enhancing both Performance and Fairness of Shared DRAM Systems

    Onur Mutlu;Thomas Moscibroda

  • Stall-Time Fair Memory Access Scheduling for Chip Multiprocessors

    Onur Mutlu;Thomas Moscibroda

  • Flikker: saving DRAM refresh-power through critical data partitioning

    Song Liu;Karthik Pattabiraman;Thomas Moscibroda;Benjamin G. Zorn

  • White space networking with wi-fi like connectivity

    Paramvir Bahl;Ranveer Chandra;Thomas Moscibroda;Rohan Murty

  • A case for bufferless routing in on-chip networks

    Thomas Moscibroda;Onur Mutlu

  • What cannot be computed locally

    Fabian Kuhn;Thomas Moscibroda;Rogert Wattenhofer

  • SenseLess: A database-driven white spaces network

    Rohan Murty;Ranveer Chandra;Thomas Moscibroda;Paramvir Bahl

  • A case for adapting channel width in wireless networks

    Ranveer Chandra;Ratul Mahajan;Thomas Moscibroda;Ramya Raghavendra

  • Allocating dynamic time-spectrum blocks in cognitive radio networks

    Yuan Yuan;Paramvir Bahl;Ranveer Chandra;Thomas Moscibroda

  • Walkie-Markie: indoor pathway mapping made easy

    Guobin Shen;Zhuo Chen;Peichao Zhang;Thomas Moscibroda

  • The Complexity of Connectivity in Wireless Networks

    T. Moscibroda;R. Wattenhofer

  • KNOWS: Cognitive Radio Networks Over White Spaces

    Yuan Yuan;P. Bahl;R. Chandra;P.A. Chou

  • Topology control meets SINR: the scheduling complexity of arbitrary topologies

    Thomas Moscibroda;Rogert Wattenhofer;Aaron Zollinger

  • Reducing memory interference in multicore systems via application-aware memory channel partitioning

    Sai Prashanth Muralidhara;Lavanya Subramanian;Onur Mutlu;Mahmut Kandemir

  • Memory performance attacks: denial of memory service in multi-core systems

    Thomas Moscibroda;Onur Mutlu

  • Dynamic Time-Spectrum Block Allocation For Cognitive Radio Networks

    Paramvir Bahl;Ranveer Chandra;Thomas Moscibroda;Gopala Sri Hari Narlanka

  • SenseLess: A database-driven white spaces network

    Unknown

  • Protocol Design Beyond Graph-Based Models.

    Thomas Moscibroda;Roger Wattenhofer;Yves Weber

  • Application-aware prioritization mechanisms for on-chip networks

    Reetuparna Das;Onur Mutlu;Thomas Moscibroda;Chita R. Das

  • Donnybrook: enabling large-scale, high-speed, peer-to-peer games

    Ashwin Bharambe;John R. Douceur;Jacob R. Lorch;Thomas Moscibroda

  • Reducing Memory Interference in Multicore Systems via Application-A ware Memory Channel Partitioning

    Sai Prashanth Muralidhara;Lavanya Subramanian;Onur Mutlu;Mahmut Kandemir

Frequent Co-Authors

Ranveer Chandra
Ranveer Chandra Microsoft (United States)
Onur Mutlu
Onur Mutlu ETH Zurich
Fabian Kuhn
Fabian Kuhn University of Freiburg
Stephen E. Hodges
Stephen E. Hodges Microsoft (United States)
John R. Douceur
John R. Douceur Microsoft (United States)
Paramvir Bahl
Paramvir Bahl Microsoft (United States)
Stefan Schmid
Stefan Schmid Technical University of Berlin
Yongguang Zhang
Yongguang Zhang Microsoft Research Asia (China)
Yossi Azar
Yossi Azar Tel Aviv University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When pursuing Computer Science studies in the USA, online degree options can offer flexibility and affordability to fit different career goals. For those aiming for advanced credentials, the most affordable doctoral programs provide rigorous education at reduced costs, making higher qualifications attainable without accumulating significant debt.

If you’re seeking a quicker route to leadership roles in education or academia, consider 2 year ed d programs online. These fast-track doctoral pathways allow you to accelerate your learning and enter advanced positions sooner.

For those eager to launch their career fast, you might ask, what degree can I get online in 6 months? Accelerated online associate degrees are available, enabling you to develop tech or business skills in a fraction of the usual time.

A popular choice for future tech entrepreneurs is an online business degree. If budgeting is a concern, you can compare online business degree cost to find programs that meet both your educational needs and financial situation.

Exploring these degree options can open up new career pathways in Computer Science and related fields, allowing you to tailor your education to your ambitions and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Moscibroda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles