World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Ecology and Evolution
Israel
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
58
Citations
12325
World Ranking
2559
National Ranking
11

Tamar Dayan publications per year

1986: 1 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publications 1991: 1 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 1 publications
1986 2026

175 publications in total across all disciplines

Tamar Dayan publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamar Dayan sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 158 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Tamar Dayan D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamar Dayan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Ecology and Evolution in Israel Leader Award

Overview

Tamar Dayan is affiliated with the Steinhardt Museum of Natural History in Israel. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a specific emphasis on subfields such as Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Genetics, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Avian ecology and behavior

Tamar Dayan has contributed to a range of peer-reviewed publications. Some recent papers include:

  • "Drivers of Infectious Disease Seasonality: Potential Implications for COVID-19," 2021, Journal of Biological Rhythms
  • "Spatial Scale Mismatches in the EU Agri-Biodiversity Conservation Policy. The Case for a Shift to Landscape-Scale Design," 2021, Land
  • "Exploring scenarios for the food system-zoonotic risk interface," 2023, The Lancet Planetary Health
  • "A model of digestive tooth corrosion in lizards: experimental tests and taphonomic implications," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Recent Evidence of Scale Matches and Mismatches Between Ecological Systems and Management Actions," 2022, Current Landscape Ecology Reports

Their work has been published most frequently in venues such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Biological Rhythms, The Lancet Planetary Health, Current Landscape Ecology Reports, and Land.

Tamar Dayan has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Shlomo Preiss-Bloom
  • Orr Comay
  • Dror Ben-Ami
  • Noga Kronfeld-Schor
  • Francesca Libera Falco

Best Publications

  • Partitioning of Time as an Ecological Resource

    Noga Kronfeld-Schor;Tamar Dayan

  • On the validity of Bergmann's rule

    Shai Meiri;Tamar Dayan

  • Ecological and community‐wide character displacement: the next generation

    Tamar Dayan;Daniel Simberloff

  • Body mass of late Quaternary mammals

    Felisa A. Smith;S. Kathleen Lyons;S. K. Morgan Ernest;Kate E. Jones

  • The Evolution of Maximum Body Size of Terrestrial Mammals

    Felisa A. Smith;Alison G. Boyer;James H. Brown;Daniel P. Costa

  • Character Displacement, Sexual Dimprphism, and Morphological Variation among British and Irish Mustelids

    Tamar Dayan;Daniel Simberloff

  • Chronobiology by moonlight.

    Noga Kronfeld-Schor;Davide M. Dominoni;Horacio de la Iglesia;Oren Levy

  • INTER- AND INTRASPECIFIC CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN MUSTELIDS'

    Tamar Dayan;Daniel Simberloff;Eitan Tchernov;Yoram Yom-Tov

  • Similarity of mammalian body size across the taxonomic hierarchy and across space and time.

    Felisa A. Smith;Felisa A. Smith;James H. Brown;John P. Haskell;S. Kathleen Lyons

  • SIZE PATTERNS AMONG COMPETITORS : ECOLOGICAL CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT AND CHARACTER RELEASE IN MAMMALS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ISLAND POPULATIONS

    Tamar Dayan;Daniel Simberloff

  • Feline Canines: Community-Wide Character Displacement Among the Small Cats of Israel

    Tamar Dayan;Daniel Simberloff;Eitan Tchernov;Yoram Yom-Tov

  • Character displacement and release in the small Indian mongoose, Herpestes javanicus

    Daniel Simberloff;Tamar Dayan;Carl Jones;Go Ogura

  • Carnivores, biases and Bergmann's rule

    Shai Meiri;Tamar Dayan;Daniel Simberloff

  • The generality of the island rule reexamined

    Shai Meiri;Tamar Dayan;Daniel Simberloff

  • Early Domesticated Dogs of the Near East

    Tamar Dayan

  • Body size of insular carnivores: little support for the island rule.

    Shai Meiri;Tamar Dayan;Daniel Simberloff

  • Differential behavioural and hormonal responses of voles and spiny mice to owl calls.

    David Eilam;Tamar Dayan;Shamgar Ben-Eliyahu;Ifat Schulman

  • Time and ecological resilience: can diurnal animals compensate for climate change by shifting to nocturnal activity?

    Ofir Levy;Tamar Dayan;Tamar Dayan;Warren P. Porter;Noga Kronfeld-Schor

  • On the role of phylogeny in determining activity patterns of rodents

    Uri Roll;Tamar Dayan;Noga Kronfeld-Schor

  • COEXISTENCE OF TEMPORALLY PARTITIONED SPINY MICE: ROLES OF HABITAT STRUCTURE AND FORAGING BEHAVIOR

    Menna Jones;Yael Mandelik;Tamar Dayan

  • Supporting Online Material for The Evolution of Maximum Body Size of Terrestrial Mammals

    Felisa A. Smith;Alison G. Boyer;James H. Brown;Daniel P. Costa

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Simberloff
Daniel Simberloff University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Shai Meiri
Shai Meiri Tel Aviv University
Yoram Yom-Tov
Yoram Yom-Tov Tel Aviv University
David Saltz
David Saltz Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Kate E. Jones
Kate E. Jones University College London
Felisa A. Smith
Felisa A. Smith University of New Mexico
James H. Brown
James H. Brown University of New Mexico
Warren P. Porter
Warren P. Porter University of Wisconsin–Madison
S. Kathleen Lyons
S. Kathleen Lyons University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Nava Zisapel
Nava Zisapel Tel Aviv University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution often sparks a passion for understanding complex social, psychological, and behavioral systems. As a result, many students explore interdisciplinary career options such as social work, mental health counseling, or forensic sciences. Earning an advanced degree can open doors to impactful roles—many of which now offer flexible online formats.

For those interested in community engagement and making a difference in individual lives, lcsw online programs equip graduates for licensure and practice in various human services settings. Alternatively, individuals seeking a deeper understanding of human behavior may pursue an accelerated psychology degree online, which allows for an expedited pathway to the field.

Those drawn to mental health can consider fast track mental health counseling programs, designed for quick entry into clinical practice. Meanwhile, students fascinated by the intersection of science and law may explore diverse careers in forensic psychology, where they can contribute valuable ecological and psychological insights within the justice system.

By leveraging these related online degree opportunities, students extend their impact across research, policy, and practice—building dynamic careers that bridge ecology, evolution, and society.

Best Scientists Citing Tamar Dayan

Trending Scientists