World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
52
Citations
9299
World Ranking
3481
National Ranking
385

Stuart B. Piertney publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart B. Piertney sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 155 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Stuart B. Piertney D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart B. Piertney sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stuart B. Piertney is affiliated with the University of Aberdeen in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with significant contributions in earth and planetary sciences. The scientist's work spans fields such as ecology, oceanography, and nature and landscape conservation, with a strong emphasis on marine biology and ecological dynamics within natural environments.

The main topics covered in their research include marine biology and ecology research, environmental DNA in biodiversity studies, bat biology and ecology, primate behavior and ecology, wildlife ecology and conservation, aquatic invertebrate ecology and behavior, and animal behavior and reproduction.

Piertney has authored several research papers published in journals that include Ecology and Evolution, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Marine Biology, Molecular Ecology, and Frontiers in Marine Science. Notable papers include:

  • Surviving winter on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: Pikas suppress energy demands and exploit yak feces to survive winter, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Scavenging amphipods from the Wallaby-Zenith Fracture Zone: Extending the hadal paradigm beyond subduction trenches, 2020, Marine Biology
  • Plasticity is a locally adapted trait with consequences for ecological dynamics in novel environments, 2021, Ecology and Evolution
  • Large effective population size masks population genetic structure in Hirondellea amphipods within the deepest marine ecosystem, the Mariana Trench, 2023, Molecular Ecology
  • Extended Pelagic Life in a Bathybenthic Octopus, 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers such as Alan J. Jamieson, John R. Speakman, Qing-Sheng Chi, Łukasz Ołdakowski, and Haibo Fu. These collaborations reflect interdisciplinary approaches across marine biology, ecology, and genetics.

Their contributions to research venues are distributed with multiple publications in Ecology and Evolution and singular papers appearing in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Marine Biology, Molecular Ecology, and Frontiers in Marine Science.

Overall, Stuart B. Piertney's work concentrates on the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of marine and terrestrial organisms, leveraging genetic and ecological data to understand species adaptation and survival strategies. Their research also explores the behavioral ecology of invertebrates and vertebrates, providing insight into complex environmental interactions and biodiversity conservation.

Best Publications

  • The evolutionary ecology of the major histocompatibility complex.

    S B Piertney;M K Oliver

  • Microplastics and synthetic particles ingested by deep-sea amphipods in six of the deepest marine ecosystems on Earth

    Alan J. Jamieson;L Brooks;Wdk Reid;Stuart Piertney

  • Bioaccumulation of persistent organic pollutants in the deepest ocean fauna.

    Alan J. Jamieson;Tamas Malkocs;Stuart B. Piertney;Toyonobu Fujii

  • Dispersal, intraspecific competition, kin competition, and kin facilitation: A review of the empirical evidence

    Xavier Lambin;J. Aars;Stuart B Piertney

  • Microsatellite primers for the Eurasian otter

    Dallas Jf;Piertney Sb

  • Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) heterozygote superiority to natural multi-parasite infections in the water vole (Arvicola terrestris).

    Matthew Kenneth Oliver;Sandra Elizabeth Telfer;Stuart Brannon Piertney

  • Ecological, morphological and genetic divergence of sympatric North Atlantic killer whale populations

    Andrew David Foote;Andrew David Foote;James Newton;Stuart Brannon Piertney;Eske Willerslev

  • Characterization and PCR multiplexing of novel highly variable tetranucleotide Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) microsatellites

    S. Paterson;Stuart Brannon Piertney;D. J. Knox;J. Gilbey

  • Local genetic structure in red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus): evidence from microsatellite DNA markers

    Stuart B. Piertney;Andrew D. C. Maccoll;Philip J. Bacon;John F. Dallas

  • Rapid diagnostic PCR assays for members of the Culicoides obsoletus and Culicoides pulicaris species complexes, implicated vectors of bluetongue virus in Europe.

    Damien V. Nolan;Simon Carpenter;James Barber;Philip S. Mellor

  • Testosterone, immunocompetence, and honest sexual signaling in male red grouse

    François Mougeot;Justin R. Irvine;Linzi Seivwright;Steve M. Redpath

  • Inbreeding depression and male fitness in black grouse

    Jacob Höglund;Stuart B Piertney;Rauno V Alatalo;Johan Lindell

  • Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix)

    Stuart Brannon Piertney;J. Hoglund

  • Fine-scale genetic structuring on Manacus manacus leks

    Lisa Shorey;Stuart Piertney;Jon Stone;Jacob Höglund

  • Similar estimates of population genetic composition and sex ratio derived from carcasses and faeces of Eurasian otter Lutra lutra

    John F. Dallas;Karen E. Coxon;Tim Sykes;Paul R. F. Chanin

  • Landscape barriers reduce gene flow in an invasive carnivore: geographical and local genetic structure of American mink in Scotland

    Andrzej Zalewski;Stuart Brannon Piertney;Hanna Zalewska;Xavier Lambin

  • Inferring local adaptation from QST–FST comparisons: neutral genetic and quantitative trait variation in European populations of great snipe

    Stein Are Saether;P. Fiske;J.A. Kålås;A. Kuresoo

  • Genetic differentiation among North Atlantic killer whale populations

    Andrew D. Foote;Andrew D. Foote;Julia T. Vilstrup;Renaud De Stephanis;Philippe Verborgh

  • Sex identification of the Eurasian otter Lutra lutra by PCR typing of spraints

    John F. Dallas;David N. Carss;Freda Marshall;Klaus-Peter Koepfli

  • Physiological Stress Mediates the Honesty of Social Signals

    Gary R. Bortolotti;Francois Mougeot;Jesus Martinez-Padilla;Lucy M. I. Webster

  • Honest sexual signalling mediated by parasite and testosterone effects on oxidative balance

    Francois Mougeot;Jesus Martinez-Padilla;Lucy M.I. Webster;Jonathan D. Blount

Frequent Co-Authors

Xavier Lambin
Xavier Lambin University of Aberdeen
François Mougeot
François Mougeot Spanish National Research Council
Jesús Martínez-Padilla
Jesús Martínez-Padilla Spanish National Research Council
Paul A. Racey
Paul A. Racey University of Exeter
Jacob Höglund
Jacob Höglund Uppsala University
Andrew D. C. MacColl
Andrew D. C. MacColl University of Nottingham
Robert A. Moss
Robert A. Moss Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Steve Paterson
Steve Paterson University of Liverpool
Gary R. Carvalho
Gary R. Carvalho Bangor University
Ian M. Davies
Ian M. Davies Marine Scotland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing a path in Ecology and Evolution opens up a diverse range of opportunities in science, research, and education. If you’re considering related online programs, you’ll find that the demand is high for professionals with interdisciplinary skills. For example, a library science degree can be a unique option for those interested in managing scientific data, archives, and educational resources.

Careers in health communication and intervention are also growing rapidly. Accredited asha online slp programs can prepare you for allied health professions addressing communication disorders, often with options to complete your studies online. If your background is in communication sciences, there are specialized SLP bridge pathway for communication sciences graduates that allow for a streamlined transition into the speech-language pathology field.

For those drawn to healthcare with a non-nursing bachelor’s, exploring best online bsn programs for non nurses can provide a fast track to nursing credentials. These flexible, affordable online degrees make it possible to change or advance your career while applying your knowledge of biological sciences and ecology.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart B. Piertney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles