World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 69 1959 1897 38 36 235 21851

Shmuel Peleg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shmuel Peleg between 1977 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shmuel Peleg published across 45 years, from 1977 to 2021, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2000. 7 of the 245 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2000. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 4 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 6 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 6 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 6 publications
1977 2021

245 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shmuel Peleg: publications per year, 1977 to 2021
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 1
1979 4
1980 3
1981 4
1982 1
1983 6
1984 6
1985 6
1986 1
1987 4
1988 8
1989 4
1990 10
1991 6
1992 7
1993 5
1994 5
1995 1
1996 6
1997 9
1998 9
1999 6
2000 14
2001 9
2002 6
2003 1
2004 6
2005 6
2006 10
2007 7
2008 5
2009 5
2010 6
2011 2
2012 3
2013 2
2014 10
2015 10
2016 8
2017 7
2018 6
2019 2
2020 1
2021 6
Total 245
Download as CSV

Shmuel Peleg publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shmuel Peleg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 232–241 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 235 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423 235
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Shmuel Peleg D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shmuel Peleg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213 69
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer vision
  • Geometry

Shmuel Peleg mainly investigates Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Image processing, Computer graphics and Image resolution. His Artificial intelligence study combines topics in areas such as Motion and Time delay and integration. Many of his studies on Computer vision involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Resolution.

The Image processing study combines topics in areas such as Graph, Image segmentation and Image formation. His research in Computer graphics intersects with topics in Object, Panorama, Field of view and Reference frame. His studies in Image resolution integrate themes in fields like Pixel, Subpixel rendering, Superresolution and Image texture.

His most cited work include:

  • Improving resolution by image registration (1602 citations)
  • Motion Analysis for Image Enhancement: Resolution, Occlusion, and Transparency (758 citations)
  • Multiple Resolution Texture Analysis and Classification (693 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Shmuel Peleg spends much of his time researching Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Computer graphics, Image processing and Image. His multidisciplinary approach integrates Artificial intelligence and Process in his work. His work on Image resolution, Motion estimation, Motion field and Optical flow as part of his general Computer vision study is frequently connected to Geography, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.

His Image resolution study also includes

  • Resolution together with Sub-pixel resolution,
  • Image restoration together with Feature detection. His work deals with themes such as Structure from motion and Match moving, which intersect with Motion field. His Computer graphics study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Panorama, Parallax and Video camera.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (75.88%)
  • Computer vision (64.91%)
  • Computer graphics (20.61%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?

  • Artificial intelligence (75.88%)
  • Computer vision (64.91%)
  • Speech recognition (7.46%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Shmuel Peleg focuses on Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Speech recognition, Artificial neural network and Epipolar geometry. His study in Pattern recognition extends to Artificial intelligence with its themes. Computer vision connects with themes related to Similarity measure in his study.

His work is dedicated to discovering how Speech recognition, Noise are connected with Filter and other disciplines. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Subtraction, Roman numerals, Arithmetic and Inference. He interconnects Algorithm and Silhouette in the investigation of issues within Epipolar geometry.

Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Temporal Segmentation of Egocentric Videos (138 citations)
  • Compact CNN for indexing egocentric videos (77 citations)
  • Visual Speech Enhancement. (65 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer vision
  • Algorithm

His scientific interests lie mostly in Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Speech recognition, Convolutional neural network and Video browsing. His work often combines Artificial intelligence and Optical imaging studies. His Computer vision study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Search engine indexing and Automatic summarization.

Shmuel Peleg combines subjects such as Artificial neural network and Noise with his study of Speech recognition. His Convolutional neural network study incorporates themes from Intelligibility, Speech reconstruction and Speechreading. His work carried out in the field of Video browsing brings together such families of science as Computer graphics and Feature.

Best Publications

  • Improving resolution by image registration

    Michal Irani;Shmuel Peleg

  • Multiple Resolution Texture Analysis and Classification

    Shmuel Peleg;Joseph Naor;Ralph Hartley;David Avnir

  • Motion Analysis for Image Enhancement: Resolution, Occlusion, and Transparency

    Michal Irani;Shmuel Peleg

  • Fully automated iris recognition system utilizing wide and narrow fields of view

    Keith James Hanna;Peter J. Burt;Shmuel Peleg;Douglas F. Dixon

  • Seamless Image Stitching in the Gradient Domain

    Anat Levin;Assaf Zomet;Shmuel Peleg;Yair Weiss

  • Computing occluding and transparent motions

    Michal Irani;Benny Rousso;Shmuel Peleg

  • Image sequence enhancement using sub-pixel displacements

    D. Keren;S. Peleg;R. Brada

  • Shift-map image editing

    Yael Pritch;Eitam Kav-Venaki;Shmuel Peleg

  • Symmetry as a continuous feature

    H. Zabrodsky;S. Peleg;D. Avnir

  • Panoramic mosaics by manifold projection

    S. Peleg;J. Herman

  • Robust super-resolution

    A. Zomet;A. Rav-Acha;S. Peleg

  • Nonchronological Video Synopsis and Indexing

    Y. Pritch;A. Rav-Acha;S. Peleg

  • A three-frame algorithm for estimating two-component image motion

    J.R. Bergen;P.J. Burt;R. Hingorani;S. Peleg

  • Omnistereo: panoramic stereo imaging

    S. Peleg;M. Ben-Ezra;Y. Pritch

  • Super resolution from image sequences

    M. Irani;S. Peleg

  • Two motion-blurred images are better than one

    Alex Rav-Acha;Shmuel Peleg

  • Making a Long Video Short: Dynamic Video Synopsis

    A. Rav-Acha;Y. Pritch;S. Peleg

  • Detecting and Tracking Multiple Moving Objects Using Temporal Integration

    Michal Irani;Benny Rousso;Shmuel Peleg

  • Stereo panorama with a single camera

    S. Peleg;M. Ben-Ezra

  • Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing

    Prem K. Kalra;Shmuel Peleg

  • Matching Three-Dimensional Objects Using Silhouettes

    Y. F. Wang;M. J. Magee;J. K. Aggarwal

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Werman
Michael Werman Hebrew University of Jerusalem
David Avnir
David Avnir Hebrew University of Jerusalem
James R. Bergen
James R. Bergen SRI International
Michal Irani
Michal Irani Weizmann Institute of Science
Peter J. Burt
Peter J. Burt SRI International
Azriel Rosenfeld
Azriel Rosenfeld University of Maryland, College Park
Daphna Weinshall
Daphna Weinshall Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Prem Kalra
Prem Kalra Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
Rakesh Kumar
Rakesh Kumar SRI International
Dani Lischinski
Dani Lischinski Hebrew University of Jerusalem

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science opens the door to multiple online degree options for further specialization and advancement. For those wanting to enhance their credentials while balancing work or personal commitments, online education offers flexibility and accessibility.

Master’s programs are a common next step, and finding affordable online masters programs can significantly reduce the financial burden of graduate education. If you’re interested in organizational leadership within tech or higher education, a phd leadership online could equip you for executive and management roles.

For those seeking to enter the job market quickly, pursuing the quickest associates degree can provide foundational skills and a streamlined route into entry-level positions. Additionally, professionals looking to advance into educational leadership or policy roles might consider the cheapest online edd programs to maximize both impact and value.

No matter your career stage, researching these pathways can help you make informed decisions to achieve your academic and professional goals in Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Shmuel Peleg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles