World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
24534
World Ranking
2909
National Ranking
1671

Sandra R. Leiblum publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra R. Leiblum sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Sandra R. Leiblum D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra R. Leiblum sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sandra R. Leiblum is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. This affiliation situates them within a research environment known for diverse academic disciplines.

Although specific publications and recent papers are not listed, this scientist's body of work is connected to Rutgers University, which suggests involvement in the academic and research activities of this institution.

Available data does not include frequent co-authors, which may indicate either a predominantly solo research career or lack of detailed public records on collaborative work.

No information is provided regarding frequent publication venues. This leaves the details about the typical journals or conferences where they publish unspecified.

There are no recorded book publications, which focuses their output primarily on articles or research reports rather than monographs or edited volumes.

The main fields and subfields of study for Sandra R. Leiblum are not specified, leaving the precise academic disciplines and research topics undefined.

Main topics of work are also not detailed, which limits insight into the specific areas of focus or scientific questions addressed in their research.

Details about awards received by Sandra R. Leiblum are not available, so there is no documented recognition or honors listed at this time.

According to available data, Sandra R. Leiblum is not deceased.

Best Publications

  • The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A Multidimensional Self-Report Instrument for the Assessment of Female Sexual Function

    R. Rosen;Candace Brown;J. Heiman;S. Leiblum

  • Report of the International Consensus Development Conference on Female Sexual Dysfunction: Definitions and Classifications

    Rosemary Basson;Jennifer Berman;Arthur Burnett;Leonard Derogatis

  • Transdermal Testosterone Treatment in Women With Impaired Sexual Function After Oophorectomy

    Jan L. Shifren;Glenn D. Braunstein;James A. Simon;Peter R. Casson

  • The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women.

    Leonard R. Derogatis;Raymond Rosen;Sandra Leiblum;Arthur Burnett

  • Definitions of women's sexual dysfunction reconsidered: advocating expansion and revision.

    R. Basson;S. Leiblum;L. Brotto;L. Derogatis

  • Revised Definitions of Women's Sexual Dysfunction

    Rosemary Basson;Sandra Leiblum;Lori Brotto;Leonard Derogatis

  • Female androgen insufficiency: the princeton consensus statement on definition, classification, and assessment

    Gloria Bachmann;John Bancroft;Glenn Braunstein;Henry Burger

  • Hypoactive sexual desire disorder in postmenopausal women: US results from the Women's International Study of Health and Sexuality (WISHeS).

    Sandra R Leiblum;Patricia E Koochaki;Cynthia A Rodenberg;Ian P Barton

  • Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction.

    Marita McCabe;Stanley E. Althof;Pierre Assalian;Marie Chevret-Measson

  • Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women: Results of a survey study of 329 women in an outpatient gynecological clinic

    Raymond C. Rosen;Jennifer F. Taylor;Sandra R. Leiblum;Gloria A. Bachmann

  • Self-report assessment of female sexual function: psychometric evaluation of the Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women.

    Jennifer F. Taylor;Raymond C. Rosen;Sandra R. Leiblum

  • Vaginal Atrophy in the Postmenopausal Woman: The Importance of Sexual Activity and Hormones

    Sandra Leiblum;Gloria Bachmann;Ekkehard Kemmann;Daniel Colburn

  • Principles and practice of sex therapy

    Sandra Risa Leiblum

  • The impact of hormones on menopausal sexuality: a literature review.

    Gloria A. Bachmann;Sandra R. Leiblum

  • Relationship between hypoactive sexual desire disorder and aging.

    Richard D. Hayes;Lorraine Dennerstein;Catherine M. Bennett;Patricia E. Koochaki

  • Women's Sexual Desire and Arousal Disorders

    Lori A. Brotto;Johannes Bitzer;Ellen Laan;Sandra Leiblum

  • Persistent sexual arousal syndrome : A newly discovered pattern of female sexuality

    Sandra R. Leiblum;Sharon G. Nathan

  • ORIGINAL RESEARCH—PSYCHOLOGY: Psychological and Interpersonal Dimensions of Sexual Function and Dysfunction

    Stanley E. Althof;Sandra R. Leiblum;Marie Chevret‐Measson;Uwe Hartmann

  • The brief index of sexual functioning for women (BISF-W): a new scoring algorithm and comparison of normative and surgically menopausal populations.

    Norman A. Mazer;Sandra R. Leiblum;Raymond C. Rosen

  • Sexual Desire Disorders

    Sandra Risa Leiblum;Raymond Rosen

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond C. Rosen
Raymond C. Rosen New England Research Institutes
Julia R. Heiman
Julia R. Heiman Indiana University
Rosemary Basson
Rosemary Basson University of British Columbia
Ellen Laan
Ellen Laan University of Amsterdam
Cindy M. Meston
Cindy M. Meston The University of Texas at Austin
Arthur L. Burnett
Arthur L. Burnett Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Lorraine Dennerstein
Lorraine Dennerstein University of Melbourne
Lori A. Brotto
Lori A. Brotto University of British Columbia
Stanley E. Althof
Stanley E. Althof Case Western Reserve University
Marita P. McCabe
Marita P. McCabe Swinburne University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA unlocks a range of diverse career pathways, both in traditional and emerging fields. Many students opt for online psychology degrees due to their flexibility and accessibility, making higher education more attainable for busy professionals or those balancing other commitments.

When exploring your options, it’s helpful to compare top programs nationwide. Regional rankings can help you identify leading institutions. For example, the best psychology program rankings in Newark showcase programs that emphasize urban psychological services, while the best psychology program rankings in New Hampshire offer insight into schools with strong rural and community psychology focuses.

Similarly, the best psychology program rankings in Orange highlight West Coast options known for research innovation, and the best psychology degree programs ranking in Orlando feature schools preparing graduates for mental health, counseling, and business-related careers.

By researching these top rankings, you can align your online degree choice with your career goals—whether you’re interested in clinical work, research, organizational psychology, or other emerging paths in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra R. Leiblum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles