World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
22
Citations
3456
World Ranking
3098
National Ranking
160

Sam Clark publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sam Clark sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 110 publications β€” 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Sam Clark D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sam Clark sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 22 D-Index β€” 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes.

    Samuel A Clark;John M Hickey;Hans D Daetwyler;Julius H J van der Werf

  • Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation

    Samuel A Clark;Samuel A Clark;John M Hickey;Julius H J van der Werf;Julius H J van der Werf

  • Genome-wide association study of body weight in Australian Merino sheep reveals an orthologous region on OAR6 to human and bovine genomic regions affecting height and weight.

    Hawlader A. Al-Mamun;Paul Kwan;Samuel A. Clark;Mohammad H. Ferdosi

  • Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (gBLUP) for the Estimation of Genomic Breeding Values

    Samuel A. Clark;Julius van der Werf

  • Genome-wide linkage disequilibrium and genetic diversity in five populations of Australian domestic sheep

    Unknown

  • The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs

    Samuel A. Clark;Brian P. Kinghorn;John M. Hickey;Julius H.J. Van Der Werf

  • Increased genetic gains in sheep, beef and dairy breeding programs from using female reproductive technologies combined with optimal contribution selection and genomic breeding values

    Tom Granleese;Tom Granleese;Samuel A. Clark;Andrew A. Swan;Julius H. J. van der Werf;Julius H. J. van der Werf

  • Genomic prediction based on selected variants from imputed whole-genome sequence data in Australian sheep populations

    Nasir Moghaddar;Majid Khansefid;Julius H. J. van der Werf;Sunduimijid Bolormaa

  • Estimation of genomic prediction accuracy from reference populations with varying degrees of relationship.

    S. Hong Lee;S. Hong Lee;Sam Clark;Julius H. J. van der Werf

  • Effect of selection and selective genotyping for creation of reference on bias and accuracy of genomic prediction

    Gopal R. Gowane;Sang Hong Lee;Sam Clark;Nasir Moghaddar

  • Genetic and phenotypic associations of feed efficiency with growth and carcass traits in Australian Angus cattle.

    JosΓ© Antonio Torres-VΓ‘zquez;Julius H J van der Werf;Samuel A Clark

  • Genome-Wide Association Study of Meat Quality Traits in Hanwoo Beef Cattle Using Imputed Whole-Genome Sequence Data.

    Mohammed Bedhane;Julius van der Werf;Cedric Gondro;Naomi Duijvesteijn

  • Genomic evaluations using similarity between haplotypes.

    John Hickey;B P Kinghorn;B Tier;S A Clark;S A Clark

  • Evaluation of partial body weight for predicting body weight and average daily gain in growing beef cattle.

    Michael D MacNeil;Michael D MacNeil;Donagh P Berry;Sam A Clark;John J Crowley

  • Combining information from genome-wide association and multi-tissue gene expression studies to elucidate factors underlying genetic variation for residual feed intake in Australian Angus cattle.

    Sara de las Heras-Saldana;Samuel A. Clark;Naomi Duijvesteijn;Cedric Gondro;Cedric Gondro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education related to Animal Science and Veterinary fields, exploring related disciplines can open up diverse career opportunities. Many students pursue degrees that complement animal care, health, and behavior sciences. For example, a solid foundation in human health and biomechanics can be gained through an exercise science degree online, which shares principles applicable to animal physiology and rehabilitation.

Behavioral analysis is another growing field connected to both human and animal therapeutic practices. Programs offering bcba accredited programs provide rigorous training in behavioral interventions that can be adapted for animal behavior specialists.

Understanding developmental and psychological foundations is also important. For those interested in psychology, pursuing cheapest online school psychology programs offer accessible options for gaining expertise in mental health and educational settings, which can intersect with animal-assisted interventions.

Lastly, for advanced mental health professionals seeking clinical practice, apa-accredited psyd programs provide accredited pathways that prepare graduates for counseling roles, including those that involve working with animal-related therapeutic methods.

Recently Published Articles