World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 67 469 426 23 23 365 15334

S.A. Meguid publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by S.A. Meguid between 1972 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. S.A. Meguid published across 50 years, from 1972 to 2021, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2015. 27 of the 365 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2015. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 5 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 4 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 12 publications
1972 2021

365 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
S.A. Meguid: publications per year, 1972 to 2021
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 5
1978 1
1979 4
1980 0
1981 2
1982 2
1983 5
1984 4
1985 2
1986 4
1987 5
1988 0
1989 4
1990 7
1991 7
1992 5
1993 5
1994 10
1995 11
1996 11
1997 11
1998 10
1999 18
2000 13
2001 17
2002 12
2003 5
2004 11
2005 7
2006 4
2007 6
2008 5
2009 4
2010 9
2011 6
2012 6
2013 7
2014 16
2015 19
2016 12
2017 16
2018 13
2019 15
2020 15
2021 12
Total 365
Download as CSV

S.A. Meguid publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where S.A. Meguid sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 357–366 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 365 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44 365
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

S.A. Meguid D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where S.A. Meguid sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29 67
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Composite material
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Thermodynamics

His scientific interests lie mostly in Composite material, Carbon nanotube, Nanocomposite, Finite element method and Nanotechnology. His work on Material properties, Stress field and Buckling as part of general Composite material study is frequently linked to van der Waals force, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. His Carbon nanotube research integrates issues from Representative elementary volume, Composite number, Epoxy and Polymer.

His study focuses on the intersection of Nanocomposite and fields such as Micromechanics with connections in the field of Surface modification, Stress relaxation, Viscoelasticity and Creep. His study in Finite element method is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Mechanics, Numerical analysis and Geometry. His Structural engineering research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Residual stress, Shot peening, Peening and Shape-memory polymer.

His most cited work include:

  • Shape morphing of aircraft wing: Status and challenges (411 citations)
  • Nonlinear analysis of functionally graded plates and shallow shells (296 citations)
  • Nanomechanics of single and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (273 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Finite element method, Composite material, Mechanics, Structural engineering and Mathematical analysis. His studies in Finite element method integrate themes in fields like Mechanical engineering, Stress, Work and Nonlinear system. His study in Carbon nanotube, Nanocomposite, Composite number, Epoxy and Solid mechanics are all subfields of Composite material.

His Carbon nanotube study incorporates themes from Representative elementary volume and Polymer. His Structural engineering research includes themes of Residual stress, Strain rate and Plasticity. The concepts of his Mathematical analysis study are interwoven with issues in Geometry and Stress intensity factor.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Finite element method (31.61%)
  • Composite material (29.48%)
  • Mechanics (21.28%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Composite material (29.48%)
  • Nanocomposite (10.94%)
  • Finite element method (31.61%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Composite material, Nanocomposite, Finite element method, Mechanics and Graphene. In most of his Composite material studies, his work intersects topics such as Nanowire. His Nanocomposite study combines topics in areas such as Diaphragm, Piezoelectricity, Elastic modulus, Volume fraction and Silicone.

His study on Finite element method is covered under Structural engineering. Shaker A. Meguid interconnects Conical surface, Nonlinear system, Frustum and Timoshenko beam theory in the investigation of issues within Mechanics. Shaker A. Meguid combines subjects such as Line scan and Representative elementary volume with his study of Carbon nanotube.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Strain gradient polarization in graphene (51 citations)
  • Molecular dynamics study of the reinforcement effect of graphene in multilayered polymer nanocomposites (44 citations)
  • Multiscale modeling of regularly staggered carbon fibers embedded in nano-reinforced composites (38 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Composite material
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Thermodynamics

His scientific interests lie mostly in Composite material, Nanocomposite, Graphene, Nanotechnology and Carbon nanotube. His work on Composite number as part of general Composite material study is frequently linked to Multiscale modeling, bridging the gap between disciplines. The Nanocomposite study combines topics in areas such as Volume fraction, Mechanical load, Epoxy and Coating.

Shaker A. Meguid focuses mostly in the field of Mechanical load, narrowing it down to topics relating to Piezoresistive effect and, in certain cases, Finite element method. His work carried out in the field of Graphene brings together such families of science as Crack closure, Stress field and Condensed matter physics. His Carbon nanotube research includes elements of Representative elementary volume and Thermosetting polymer.

Best Publications

  • Shape morphing of aircraft wing: Status and challenges

    A.Y.N. Sofla;S.A. Meguid;K.T. Tan;W.K. Yeo

  • Nonlinear analysis of functionally graded plates and shallow shells

    J. Woo;S.A. Meguid

  • On the tensile and shear strength of nano-reinforced composite interfaces

    S.A Meguid;Y Sun

  • Three—dimensional dynamic finite element analysis of shot-peening induced residual stresses

    S. A. Meguid;G. Shagal;J. C. Stranart;J. Daly

  • 3D FE analysis of peening of strain-rate sensitive materials using multiple impingement model

    S.A. Meguid;G. Shagal;J.C. Stranart

  • Tunneling resistance and its effect on the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube nanocomposites

    W. S. Bao;S. A. Meguid;Z. H. Zhu;G. J. Weng

  • Nonlinear free vibration behavior of functionally graded plates

    J. Woo;S.A. Meguid;L.S. Ong

  • On the mechanical characterization of carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy adhesives

    J.M. Wernik;S.A. Meguid

  • Multiscale modeling of carbon nanotube epoxy composites

    A.R. Alian;S.I. Kundalwal;S.A. Meguid

  • A continuum model with a percolation threshold and tunneling-assisted interfacial conductivity for carbon nanotube-based nanocomposites

    Yang Wang;George J. Weng;Shaker A. Meguid;Abdel Magid Hamouda

  • FE modelling of deformation localization in metallic foams

    S.A. Meguid;S.S. Cheon;N. El-Abbasi

  • Finite element modelling of shot-peening residual stresses

    S.A Meguid;G Shagal;J.C Stranart

  • A novel approach to predict the electrical conductivity of multifunctional nanocomposites

    W. S. Bao;W. S. Bao;S. A. Meguid;Z. H. Zhu;Y. Pan

  • Thermomechanical postbuckling analysis of moderately thick functionally graded plates and shallow shells

    J. Woo;S.A. Meguid;J.C. Stranart;K.M. Liew

  • Development of novel superhydrophobic coatings using siloxane-modified epoxy nanocomposites

    Assem Elzaabalawy;Shaker A. Meguid

  • Determination of the interfacial properties of carbon nanotube reinforced polymer composites using atomistic-based continuum model

    J.M. Wernik;B.J. Cornwell-Mott;S.A. Meguid

  • Three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of dovetail joints in aeroengine discs

    P. Papanikos;S. A. Meguid;Z. Stjepanovic

  • On the electroelastic behaviour of a thin piezoelectric actuator attached to an infinite host structure

    X.D. Wang;S.A. Meguid

  • Strain gradient polarization in graphene

    S. I. Kundalwal;S. A. Meguid;George Weng

  • On the Elastic Field of a Shpherical Inhomogeneity with an Imperfectly Bonded Interface

    Z. Zhong;S. A. Meguid

  • Interface effects on the viscoelastic characteristics of carbon nanotube polymer matrix composites

    Y. Pan;G.J. Weng;S.A. Meguid;W.S. Bao;W.S. Bao

  • Thermomechanical postbuckling analysis of functionally graded plates and shallow cylindrical shells

    J. Woo;S. A. Meguid;K. M. Liew

  • A new shell element accounting for through-thickness deformation

    N. El-Abbasi;S.A. Meguid

  • On the crush behaviour of ultralight foam-filled structures

    S.A. Meguid;M.S. Attia;A. Monfort

  • Modeling and characterization of carbon nanotube agglomeration effect on electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube polymer composites

    S. Gong;Z. H. Zhu;J. Li;S. A. Meguid

  • Asymptotic homogenization of elastic composite materials with a regular structure

    S.A. Meguid;A.L. Kalamkarov

  • Nonlinear finite element analysis of the crush behaviour of functionally graded foam-filled columns

    M. S. Attia;S. A. Meguid;H. Nouraei

  • Crack propagation in the presence of shot-peening residual stresses

    D.W. Hammond;S.A. Meguid

  • Analysis of Conducting Rigid Inclusion at the Interface of Two Dissimilar Piezoelectric Materials

    Wei Deng;S. A. Meguid

  • Percolation threshold and electrical conductivity of a two-phase composite containing randomly oriented ellipsoidal inclusions

    Y. Pan;G. J. Weng;S. A. Meguid;W. S. Bao

  • On the dynamic propagation of a finite crack in functionally graded materials

    S.A. Meguid;X.D. Wang;L.Y. Jiang

  • Interfacial debonding of a circular inhomogeneity in piezoelectric materials

    Z. Zhong;S.A. Meguid

  • On the Influence of Hardening and Anisotropy on the Plane-Strain Compression of Thin Metal Strip

    I. F. Collins;S. A. Meguid

  • A General Treatment of the Elastic Field of an Elliptical Inhomogeneity Under Antiplane Shear

    S. X. Gong;S. A. Meguid

  • Micromechanics modelling of the effective thermoelastic response of nano-tailored composites

    S.I. Kundalwal;S.A. Meguid

Frequent Co-Authors

Zheng H. Zhu
Zheng H. Zhu York University
K.M. Liew
K.M. Liew City University of Hong Kong
George J. Weng
George J. Weng Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Abdel Magid Hamouda
Abdel Magid Hamouda Qatar University
Robert M. Pilliar
Robert M. Pilliar University of Toronto
Xiaoqiao He
Xiaoqiao He City University of Hong Kong
Peng Yu
Peng Yu Southern University of Science and Technology
Teng Yong Ng
Teng Yong Ng Nanyang Technological University
Ming Jen Tan
Ming Jen Tan Nanyang Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in broadening their expertise beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related fields can open new career opportunities. Speech-language pathology, for example, offers a growing demand for specialists who enhance communication abilities. Understanding the slp grad school acceptance rate is crucial for those considering this path, as it helps set realistic expectations for admission.

Many prospective students look for programs with less competitive admissions. Identifying the easiest slp masters to get into can guide applicants toward attainable options without compromising education quality. With rising education costs, evaluating the speech pathology degree online cost is essential for budgeting and financial planning.

Additionally, specialized programs cater to unique groups, such as veterans, providing tailored support and resources. Exploring speech pathology programs online for veterans can help former military personnel transition smoothly into new careers.

By understanding these factors, students can make informed decisions when pursuing related online degrees and expanding their career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing S.A. Meguid

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles