World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
61
Citations
11066
World Ranking
669
National Ranking
290

Ronald Scott Bunker publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald Scott Bunker sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 287 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Ronald Scott Bunker D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald Scott Bunker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald Scott Bunker is affiliated with General Electric in the United States. Their professional activities are centered within this organization and region.

There are no records of recent papers published by Ronald Scott Bunker. Likewise, there are no frequent co-authors or recurring publication venues associated with their work in the available data.

Their research focus does not list any specific main fields of study, subfields, or main topics. Similarly, there is no information on book publications or awards received.

While the specific details of their scientific output and collaborations are not documented here, their connection to General Electric suggests involvement in applied or industrial research fields that align with GE's business areas.

Best Publications

  • A review of shaped hole turbine film-cooling technology

    Ronald S. Bunker

  • Axial Turbine Blade Tips: Function, Design, and Durability

    Ronald S. Bunker

  • Effect of Trench Width and Depth on Film Cooling From Cylindrical Holes Embedded in Trenches

    Yiping Lu;Alok Dhungel;Srinath V. Ekkad;Ronald S. Bunker

  • Gas Turbine Heat Transfer: Ten Remaining Hot Gas Path Challenges

    Ronald S. Bunker

  • Local Heat Transfer in Internally Cooled Turbine Airfoil Leading Edge Regions: Part II—Impingement Cooling With Film Coolant Extraction

    D. E. Metzger;R. S. Bunker

  • Film cooled wall with chevron-shaped cooling holes

    Lee Ching-Pang;Ronald Scott Bunker;Steven Robert Brassfield

  • A Review of Turbine Blade Tip Heat Transfer

    Ronald S. Bunker

  • METHOD FOR IMPROVING COOLING EFFECT OF GASEOUS COOLING MEDIUM FLOW AND RELEVANT PRODUCT

    Bunker Ronald Scott;Bailey Jeremy Clyde;Lee Ching-Pang;Abuaf Nesim

  • Film Cooling Effectiveness Due to Discrete Holes Within a Transverse Surface Slot

    Ronald S. Bunker

  • Heat Transfer and Flow on the First Stage Blade Tip of a Power Generation Gas Turbine: Part 1 — Experimental Results

    Ronald S. Bunker;Jeremy C. Bailey;Ali A. Ameri

  • Cavity Heat Transfer on a Transverse Grooved Wall in a Narrow Flow Channel

    D. E. Metzger;R. S. Bunker;M. K. Chyu

  • Heat Transfer and Flow on the First Stage Blade Tip of a Power Generation Gas Turbine: Part 2 — Simulation Results

    A. A. Ameri;R. S. Bunker

  • Film cooled wall

    Ching-Pang Lee;Ronald Scott Bunker;Nesim Abuaf

  • Turbine stage with scalloped surface platform

    Anna Tam;Ching-Pang Lee;Kevin Richard Kirtley;Ronald Scott Bunker

  • Turbine airfoil with double shell outer wall

    Ronald S. Bunker;Thomas T. Wallace

  • Heat Transfer Coefficients on the Squealer Tip and Near-Tip Regions of a Gas Turbine Blade With Single or Double Squealer

    Jae Su Kwak;Jaeyong Ahn;Je-Chin Han;C. Pang Lee

  • Film cooled blade tip

    Ronald Scott Bunker

  • Cooling for double-wall structures

    Ronald Scott Bunker

  • The Effects of Manufacturing Tolerances on Gas Turbine Cooling

    Ronald S. Bunker

  • Effect of Squealer Geometry Arrangement on a Gas Turbine Blade Tip Heat Transfer

    Gm Salam Azad;Je-Chin Han;Ronald S. Bunker;C. Pang Lee

  • Hot gas path component with mesh and impingement cooling

    Ronald Scott Bunker;Ching-Pang Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Ching-Pang Lee
Ching-Pang Lee Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
Srinath V. Ekkad
Srinath V. Ekkad North Carolina State University
Melvin Robert Jackson
Melvin Robert Jackson General Electric (United States)
Ali Ameri
Ali Ameri The Ohio State University
Je-Chin Han
Je-Chin Han Texas A&M University
David G. Bogard
David G. Bogard The University of Texas at Austin
Sumanta Acharya
Sumanta Acharya Illinois Institute of Technology
Minking K. Chyu
Minking K. Chyu University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring interdisciplinary options alongside Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, considering related fields can be a strategic move. For instance, pursuing an online applied behavior analysis degree accelerated might appeal to those interested in human factors and ergonomics within engineering design.

Similarly, those drawn to communication sciences may explore pathways in Speech-Language Pathology (SLP). Understanding admissions challenges is key; learning about slp grad school acceptance rate helps prospective students set realistic expectations.

Finding the right program is crucial. The list of speech-language pathology graduate programs by state offers valuable insights for those prioritizing accessibility and regional options.

Cost is always a deciding factor. Reviewing online speech pathology degree tuition and fees provides clarity on financial commitments, aiding in informed decision-making.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald Scott Bunker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles