World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert W. Dykes

Robert W. Dykes

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
8032
World Ranking
6222
National Ranking
358

Robert W. Dykes publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Dykes sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 125 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Robert W. Dykes D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Dykes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert W. Dykes is affiliated with McGill University in Canada. Their academic profile encompasses a research career with contributions from this institutional base.

There are no listed recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications associated with Robert W. Dykes in the available data.

Similarly, there are no details on main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work to outline particular areas of research focus.

Information on awards or recognitions has not been provided.

This profile reflects the data available and does not include evaluations or assessments of the scientist's work or impact.

Best Publications

  • Functional role of GABA in cat primary somatosensory cortex: shaping receptive fields of cortical neurons.

    R. W. Dykes;P. Landry;R. Metherate;T. P. Hicks

  • Binaural response-specific bands in primary auditory cortex (AI) of the cat: Topographical organization orthogonal to isofrequency contours

    John C. Middlebrooks;Robert W. Dykes;Michael M. Merzenich

  • "Cold" fiber population innervating palmar and digital skin of the monkey: responses to cooling pulses.

    I Darian-Smith;K O Johnson;R Dykes

  • ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF ACETYLCHOLINE AND THE ROLE OF THE BASAL FOREBRAIN IN THE SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX OF THE CAT. II, CORTICAL NEURONS EXCITED BY SOMATIC STIMULI

    N. Tremblay;R. A. Warren;R. W. Dykes

  • Long-term enhancement of evoked potentials in cat somatosensory cortex produced by co-activation of the basal forebrain and cutaneous receptors.

    D. D. Rasmusson;R. W. Dykes

  • The somatotopic organization of the ventroposterior thalamus of the squirrel monkey, Saimiri sciureus.

    J. H. Kaas;R. J. Nelson;M. Sur;R. W. Dykes

  • Parallel processing of somatosensory information: a theory.

    Robert W. Dykes

  • Acetylcholine permits long-term enhancement of neuronal responsiveness in cat primary somatosensory cortex.

    R. Metherate;N. Tremblay;R.W. Dykes

  • Mechanisms controlling neuronal plasticity in somatosensory cortex.

    R W Dykes

  • Submodality segregation and receptive-field sequences in cuneate, gracile, and external cuneate nuclei of the cat.

    R W Dykes;D D Rasmusson;D Sretavan;N B Rehman

  • Regional segregation of neurons responding to quickly adapting, slowly adapting, deep and pacinian receptors within thalamic ventroposterior lateral and ventroposterior inferior nuclei in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus)

    R.W. Dykes;M. Sur;M.M. Merzenich;J.H. Kaas;J.H. Kaas

  • The effects of acetylcholine on response properties of cat somatosensory cortical neurons.

    Raju Metherate;N. Tremblay;R. W. Dykes

  • Transient and prolonged effects of acetylcholine on responsiveness of cat somatosensory cortical neurons.

    Raju Metherate;N. Tremblay;R. W. Dykes

  • Receptive field size for certain neurons in primary somatosensory cortex is determined by GABA-mediated intracortical inhibition.

    T.P. Hicks;R.W. Dykes

  • A review of current theories and treatments for phantom limb pain

    Kassondra L. Collins;Hannah G. Russell;Patrick J. Schumacher;Katherine E. Robinson-Freeman

  • Differential control of cortical activity by the basal forebrain in rats: a role for both cholinergic and inhibitory influences.

    María E. Jiménez‐Capdeville;Robert W. Dykes;Alexandre A. Myasnikov

  • Organization of primary somatosensory cortex in the cat.

    Unknown

  • Recovery of function in free muscle transplants using microneurovascular anastomoses

    J.K. Terzis;R.C. Sweet;R.C. Sweet;R.W. Dykes;R.W. Dykes;H.B. Williams;H.B. Williams

  • An iontophoretic study of single somatosensory neurons in rat granular cortex serving the limbs: a laminar analysis of glutamate and acetylcholine effects on receptive-field properties.

    Y. Lamour;P. Dutar;A. Jobert;R. W. Dykes

  • Reinnervation of glabrous skin in baboons: properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors subsequent to nerve transection

    J. K. Terzis;R. W. Dykes

  • Basal forebrain lesions with or without reserpine injection inhibit cortical reorganization in rat hindpaw primary somatosensory cortex following sciatic nerve section.

    Webster Hh;Hanisch Uk;Dykes Rw;Biesold D

Frequent Co-Authors

Tomás A. Reader
Tomás A. Reader University of Montreal
Yvon Lamour
Yvon Lamour Grenoble Alpes University
Massimo Avoli
Massimo Avoli McGill University
Pierre Gloor
Pierre Gloor Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Patrick Dutar
Patrick Dutar University of Paris-Saclay
Laurent Descarries
Laurent Descarries University of Montreal
Y. Lamarre
Y. Lamarre University of Montreal
Wolfgang Härtig
Wolfgang Härtig Leipzig University
A.D. (Bud) Craig
A.D. (Bud) Craig Barrow Neurological Institute
Reinhard Schliebs
Reinhard Schliebs Leipzig University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Dykes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles