World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert S. Mittler

Robert S. Mittler

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
12196
World Ranking
14363
National Ranking
6051

Robert S. Mittler publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert S. Mittler sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 117 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Robert S. Mittler D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert S. Mittler sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert S. Mittler is affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their research contributions, collaborations, and publication venues have not been detailed in the available data.

No specific papers, co-authors, or publication venues have been recorded for this scientist. Similarly, there is no information available regarding book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or primary research topics associated with their work.

There are no awards or recognitions listed in the current data.

This overview is based solely on the verified affiliation and identity of Robert S. Mittler without further documented academic outputs or achievements at this time.

Best Publications

  • Monoclonal antibodies against the 4-1BB T-cell activation molecule eradicate established tumors

    Ignacio Melero;Walter W. Shuford;Stephanie Ashe Newby;Alejandro Aruffo

  • 4-1BB costimulatory signals preferentially induce CD8+ T cell proliferation and lead to the amplification in vivo of cytotoxic T cell responses.

    Walter W. Shuford;Kerry Klussman;Douglas D. Tritchler;Deryk T. Loo

  • Intracellular Trafficking of CTLA-4 and Focal Localization Towards Sites of TCR Engagement

    Peter S Linsley;Jeff Bradshaw;JoAnne Greene;Robert Peach

  • Cutting edge: 4-1BB is a bona fide CD8 T cell survival signal.

    Chikara Takahashi;Robert S. Mittler;Anthony T. Vella

  • Eradication of established tumors in mice by a combination antibody-based therapy.

    Tomoyasu Uno;Kazuyoshi Takeda;Kazuyoshi Takeda;Yuko Kojima;Hirohisa Yoshizawa

  • AMPLIFICATION OF TUMOR IMMUNITY BY GENE TRANSFER OF THE CO-STIMULATORY 4-1BB LIGAND : SYNERGY WITH THE CD28 CO-STIMULATORY PATHWAY

    Ignacio Melero;Nathan Bach;Karl Erik Hellström;Alejandro Aruffo

  • Multivalent 4-1BB binding aptamers costimulate CD8+ T cells and inhibit tumor growth in mice

    James O. McNamara;Despina Kolonias;Fernando Pastor;Robert S. Mittler

  • CD137 costimulatory T cell receptor engagement reverses acute disease in lupus-prone NZB × NZW F1 mice

    Juergen Foell;Simona Strahotin;Shawn P. O’Neil;Megan M. McCausland

  • Correction: Corrigendum: Long-lived antigen-induced IgM plasma cells demonstrate somatic mutations and contribute to long-term protection

    Caitlin Bohannon;Ryan Powers;Lakshmipriyadarshini Satyabhama;Ang Cui

  • ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase, CD45, and T cell receptor involvement in UV- and H2O2-induced T cell signal transduction.

    Gary L. Schieven;Robert S. Mittler;Steven G. Nadler;Jean M. Kirihara

  • 4-1BB costimulation is required for protective anti-viral immunity after peptide vaccination.

    Joyce T. Tan;Jason K. Whitmire;Kaja Murali-Krishna;Rafi Ahmed

  • Cytokine-mediated disruption of lymphocyte trafficking, hemopoiesis, and induction of lymphopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia in anti-CD137-treated mice.

    Liguo Niu;Simona Strahotin;Becker Hewes;Benyue Zhang

  • CD134 Plus CD137 Dual Costimulation Induces Eomesodermin in CD4 T Cells To Program Cytotoxic Th1 Differentiation

    Harry Z. Qui;Adam T. Hagymasi;Suman Bandyopadhyay;Marie-Clare St. Rose

  • Cutting Edge: Deficiency in the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Cbl-b Results in a Multifunctional Defect in T Cell TGF-β Sensitivity In Vitro and In Vivo

    Elizabeth A. Wohlfert;Leonid Gorelik;Robert Mittler;Richard A. Flavell

  • 4-1BB and OX40 Dual Costimulation Synergistically Stimulate Primary Specific CD8 T Cells for Robust Effector Function

    Seung-Joo Lee;Lara Myers;Guruprasaadh Muralimohan;Jie Dai

  • In Vivo Triggering Through 4-1BB Enables Th-Independent Priming of CTL in the Presence of an Intact CD28 Costimulatory Pathway

    Linda Diehl;Geertje J. D. van Mierlo;Annemieke T. den Boer;Ellen van der Voort

  • 4‐1BB co‐stimulation enhances human CD8+ T cell priming by augmenting the proliferation and survival of effector CD8+ T cells

    Diego Laderach;Mojgan Movassagh;Anthony Johnson;Robert S. Mittler

  • Peptide-Specific CD8 T Regulatory Cells Use IFN-γ to Elaborate TGF-β-Based Suppression

    Lara Myers;Michael Croft;Byoung S. Kwon;Robert S. Mittler

  • Vaccination with dendritic cells pulsed with apoptotic tumors in combination with anti-OX40 and anti-4-1BB monoclonal antibodies induces T cell-mediated protective immunity in Her-2/neu transgenic mice.

    Camilo Cuadros;Ana Lucia Dominguez;Pier-Luigi Lollini;Michael Croft

  • Immunity to Pre-1950 H1N1 Influenza Viruses Confers Cross-Protection against the Pandemic Swine-Origin 2009 A (H1N1) Influenza Virus

    Ioanna Skountzou;Dimitrios G. Koutsonanos;Jin Hyang Kim;Ryan Powers

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony T. Vella
Anthony T. Vella University of Connecticut Health Center
Byoung S. Kwon
Byoung S. Kwon Tulane University
Rafi Ahmed
Rafi Ahmed Emory University
Michael Croft
Michael Croft La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology
Hideo Yagita
Hideo Yagita Juntendo University
Brian D. Plikaytis
Brian D. Plikaytis Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Conrad P. Quinn
Conrad P. Quinn Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Steven H. Kleinstein
Steven H. Kleinstein Yale University
Adam J. Adler
Adam J. Adler University of Connecticut Health Center
Martin L. Moore
Martin L. Moore Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology or Biochemistry sets the stage for diverse online degrees and emerging career opportunities in healthcare and life sciences. A rapidly growing path for graduates is in health information management, where you can enroll in health information management online programs to gain expertise in both medical data and technology.

Many students also explore medical billing and coding—integral roles in today’s healthcare system. If you’re interested in this direction, it’s helpful to understand the medical coder salary ranges, as well as the medical billing and coding job outlook. Both factors show promising potential and stability, making them a solid choice for science graduates looking for flexible, in-demand careers.

Another rewarding option is advancing into nutrition science. For those wanting to make a difference in health promotion or clinical dietetics, evaluating the cost of masters degree in nutrition can help you plan your next academic step without financial surprises.

Exploring these related online programs can open new doors to meaningful and high-growth careers that build on your foundation in biology and biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Robert S. Mittler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles