World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eun-Cheol Kim

Eun-Cheol Kim

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
9559
World Ranking
12819
National Ranking
144

Eun-Cheol Kim publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eun-Cheol Kim sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 221 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Eun-Cheol Kim D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eun-Cheol Kim sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eun-Cheol Kim is affiliated with Kyung Hee University in South Korea. The scientist's research contributions are associated with this institution.

The scientist's recent publication record does not include any listed papers. There is no available data on frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications.

Information regarding the main fields and subfields of study is not provided for this researcher. Similarly, there are no details about the primary topics of work or research focus areas.

No awards or recognitions have been recorded in the provided data. Eun-Cheol Kim is currently living.

Best Publications

  • Enhanced bone regeneration with a gold nanoparticle-hydrogel complex.

    Dong Nyoung Heo;Wan-Kyu Ko;Min Soo Bae;Jung Bok Lee

  • Magnetic nanocomposite scaffolds combined with static magnetic field in the stimulation of osteoblastic differentiation and bone formation.

    Hyung-Mun Yun;Su-Jin Ahn;Kyung-Ran Park;Mi-Joo Kim

  • Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate on dentin bridge formation and expression of dentin sialoprotein and heme oxygenase-1 in human dental pulp.

    Kyung-San Min;Hyo-Jin Park;Sun-Kyung Lee;Sang-Hyuk Park

  • Electrospun chitosan nanofibers with controlled levels of silver nanoparticles. Preparation, characterization and antibacterial activity

    Sang Jin Lee;Dong Nyoung Heo;Ji-Hoi Moon;Wan-Kyu Ko

  • Cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of melatonin in hydrogen peroxide-stimulated CHON-001 human chondrocyte cell line and rabbit model of osteoarthritis via the SIRT1 pathway.

    Hyun-Dae Lim;Young-Suk Kim;Seok-Ho Ko;In-Jong Yoon

  • The human lysyl oxidase-like 2 protein functions as an amine oxidase toward collagen and elastin

    Young-Mi Kim;Eun-Cheol Kim;Youngho Kim

  • An Overview of Pathogen Recognition Receptors for Innate Immunity in Dental Pulp

    Ji-Hyun Jang;Hee Woong Shin;Jung Min Lee;Hyeon-Woo Lee

  • Human pulp cells response to Portland cement in vitro.

    Kyung-San Min;Hyun-Il Kim;Hyo-Jin Park;Sung-Hee Pi

  • Inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses by piperine.

    Gi-Sang Bae;Min-Sun Kim;Won-Seok Jung;Sang-Wan Seo

  • Effects of nicotine on proliferation, cell cycle, and differentiation in immortalized and malignant oral keratinocytes

    Hwa-Jeong Lee;Han-Young Guo;Sun-Kyung Lee;Byung-Hun Jeon

  • Inhibition of osteoclast differentiation by gold nanoparticles functionalized with cyclodextrin curcumin complexes.

    Dong Nyoung Heo;Wan-Kyu Ko;Ho-Jin Moon;Han-Jun Kim

  • Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells Are More Effective Than Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Cerebral Ischemic Injury.

    Miyeoun Song;Jae-Hyung Lee;Jinhyun Bae;Youngmin Bu

  • Anti-inflammatory effects of apigenin on nicotine- and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human periodontal ligament cells via heme oxygenase-1.

    Gil-Saeng Jeong;Seoung-Hoon Lee;Seong-Nyum Jeong;Youn-Chul Kim

  • In Vitro Biocompatibility, Inflammatory Response, and Osteogenic Potential of 4 Root Canal Sealers: Sealapex, Sankin Apatite Root Sealer, MTA Fillapex, and iRoot SP Root Canal Sealer

    Seok-Woo Chang;So-Youn Lee;Soo-Kyung Kang;Kee-Yeon Kum

  • Identification of Independent Middle Mesial Canal in Mandibular First Molar Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging

    Sung-Ho La;Dong-Ho Jung;Eun-Cheol Kim;Kyung-San Min

  • Evaluation of the radiopacity and cytotoxicity of Portland cements containing bismuth oxide.

    Eun-Cheol Kim;Byung-Cheon Lee;Hoon-Sang Chang;Wan Lee

  • The Combined Effect of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Enamel Matrix Derivative on Odontoblastic Differentiation in Human Dental Pulp Cells

    Kyung-San Min;Seong-Hak Yang;Eun-Cheol Kim

  • The induction of heme oxygenase-1 modulates bismuth oxide-induced cytotoxicity in human dental pulp cells.

    Kyung-San Min;Hoon-Sang Chang;Ji-Myung Bae;Sang-Hyuk Park

  • Effects of calcium silicate endodontic cements on biocompatibility and mineralization-inducing potentials in human dental pulp cells

    Seok-Woo Chang;So-Youn Lee;Hyo-Jung Ann;Kee-Yeon Kum

  • Effects of moderate intensity static magnetic fields on human bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells

    Eun-Cheol Kim;Richard Leesungbok;Suk-Won Lee;Hyeon-Woo Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Chang-Duk Jun
Chang-Duk Jun Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology
Hae-Won Kim
Hae-Won Kim Dankook University
Youn-Chul Kim
Youn-Chul Kim Wonkwang University
Hun-Taeg Chung
Hun-Taeg Chung University of Ulsan
Hyun-Ock Pae
Hyun-Ock Pae Wonkwang University
Il Keun Kwon
Il Keun Kwon Kyung Hee University
Jin Tae Hong
Jin Tae Hong Chungbuk National University
Raekil Park
Raekil Park Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology
Han-Jung Chae
Han-Jung Chae Jeonbuk National University
Eun-Young Choi
Eun-Young Choi Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Biology or Biochemistry in the USA, there are several related online degrees and evolving career options to explore. One increasingly popular field is health information management, which blends life sciences with technology and healthcare administration. Today, many students choose health information management online programs because they offer flexibility and affordable tuition rates.

For those interested in blending biology knowledge with data and coding, medical coding is a rewarding option. Wondering “is medical coding a good job?” This fast-growing profession often allows remote work, job stability, and competitive compensation. According to recent data, the medical coding salary can be attractive even for recent graduates.

Students frequently ask about specialized credentials like the ccs certification, which can help you advance in roles focused on hospital coding and compliance. Whether you prefer life sciences, data analysis, or healthcare systems, online degree pathways offer diverse opportunities to launch a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Eun-Cheol Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles