World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
6023
World Ranking
11194
National Ranking
708

Robert J. Piechocki publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Piechocki sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 311 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Robert J. Piechocki D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Piechocki sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert J. Piechocki is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within engineering and computer science, with a focus on electrical and electronic engineering as well as computer networks and communications.

Their work covers several subfields, including:

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Artificial Intelligence

They have contributed extensively to topics related to indoor and outdoor localization technologies, non-invasive vital sign monitoring, and cooperative communication and network coding. Other key topics in their research portfolio include speech and audio processing, advanced MIMO systems optimization, context-aware activity recognition systems, and IoT and edge/fog computing.

Frequent coauthors in their publications include:

  • Xiaoyang Wang
  • Mohammud Junaid Bocus
  • Raúl Santos-Rodríguez
  • Peizheng Li
  • Arjun Parekh

Their publications often appear in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Scientific Data
  • 2022 IEEE 96th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2022-Fall)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Recent significant papers include:

  • "Passive WiFi Radar for Human Sensing Using a Stand-Alone Access Point", 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • "OPERAnet, a multimodal activity recognition dataset acquired from radio frequency and vision-based sensors", 2022, Scientific Data
  • "On CSI and Passive Wi-Fi Radar for Opportunistic Physical Activity Recognition", 2021, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
  • "TSCH Networks for Health IoT", 2020, ACM Transactions on Internet of Things
  • "Self-play learning strategies for resource assignment in Open-RAN networks", 2022, Computer Networks

Best Publications

  • IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2012

    Andreas C Muller;Dino Sejdinovic;Robert J Piechocki

  • Expanding window fountain codes for unequal error protection

    D. Sejdinovic;D. Vukobratovic;A. Doufexi;V. Senk

  • A Survey on Wireless Body Area Networks for eHealthcare Systems in Residential Environments

    Mohammad Ghamari;Balazs Janko;R. Simon Sherratt;William S. Harwin

  • Sparse Malicious False Data Injection Attacks and Defense Mechanisms in Smart Grids

    Jinping Hao;Robert J. Piechocki;Dritan Kaleshi;Woon Hau Chin

  • Low Throughput Networks for the IoT: Lessons learned from industrial implementations

    George Margelis;Robert Piechocki;Dritan Kaleshi;Paul Thomas

  • Modeling and Design of Millimeter-Wave Networks for Highway Vehicular Communication

    Andrea Tassi;Malcolm Egan;Robert J. Piechocki;Andrew Nix

  • Exploiting WiFi Channel State Information for Residential Healthcare Informatics

    Bo Tan;Qingchao Chen;Kevin Chetty;Karl Woodbridge

  • Expanding Window Fountain Codes for Unequal Error Protection

    D. Sejdinovic;D. Vukobratovic;A. Doufexi;V. Senk

  • N2D: (Not Too) Deep Clustering via Clustering the Local Manifold of an Autoencoded Embedding

    Ryan McConville;Raul Santos-Rodriguez;Robert J Piechocki;Ian Craddock

  • A multi-modal sensor infrastructure for healthcare in a residential environment

    Przemyslaw Woznowski;Xenofon Fafoutis;Terence Song;Sion Hannuna

  • Performance evaluation of BLAST-OFDM enhanced Hiperlan/2 using simulated and measured channel data

    R.J. Piechocki;P.N. Fletcher;A.R. Nix;C.N. Canagarajah

  • Passive WiFi Radar for Human Sensing Using a Stand-Alone Access Point

    Wenda Li;Robert J. Piechocki;Karl Woodbridge;Chong Tang

  • AND-OR tree analysis of distributed LT codes

    Dino Sejdinovic;Robert J. Piechocki;Angela Doufexi

  • An Ultra Low Power Personalizable Wrist Worn ECG Monitor Integrated With IoT Infrastructure

    Christopher Beach;Sammy Krachunov;James Pope;Xenofon Fafoutis

  • SPHERE: A sensor platform for healthcare in a residential environment

    Pete R Woznowski;Alison B Burrows;Tom Diethe;Xenofon Fafoutis

  • Passive Radar for Opportunistic Monitoring in E-Health Applications

    Wenda Li;Bo Tan;Robert Piechocki

  • Gaussian approximation based mixture reduction for near optimum detection in MIMO systems

    Yugang Jia;C. Andrieu;R.J. Piechocki;M. Sandell

  • Simple general formula for PDF of angle of arrival in large cell operational environments

    Robert J Piechocki;G Tsoulos;JP McGeehan

  • Extending the battery lifetime of wearable sensors with embedded machine learning

    Xenofon Fafoutis;Letizia Marchegiani;Atis Elsts;James Pope

  • IEEE Information Theory Workshop on Networking and Information Theory, 2009 (ITW 2009), Volos, Greece

    D Sejdinovic;Robert J Piechocki;Angela Doufexi

  • Beam alignment for millimetre wave links with motion prediction of autonomous vehicles

    Ioannis Mavromatis;Ioannis Mavromatis;Andrea Tassi;Robert J. Piechocki;Andrew R. Nix

  • A new stochastic spatio-temporal propagation model (SSTPM) for mobile communications with antenna arrays

    R.J. Piechocki;J.P. McGeehan;G.V. Tsoulos

  • Enabling Healthcare in Smart Homes: The SPHERE IoT Network Infrastructure

    Atis Elsts;Xenofon Fafoutis;Przemyslaw Woznowski;Emma Tonkin

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew R Nix
Andrew R Nix University of Bristol
Ian J Craddock
Ian J Craddock University of Bristol
Christophe Andrieu
Christophe Andrieu University of Bristol
Joe McGeehan
Joe McGeehan University of Bristol
Karl Woodbridge
Karl Woodbridge University College London
Zhong Fan
Zhong Fan Keele University
Nishan Canagarajah
Nishan Canagarajah University of Bristol
Mark A Beach
Mark A Beach University of Bristol
Ayalvadi Ganesh
Ayalvadi Ganesh University of Bristol
Simon Armour
Simon Armour University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a wide range of online learning and career opportunities. Many students are also drawn to data science degrees, which provide versatile skills for analyzing and interpreting data—skills that are highly valued across industries.

Affordability is an important consideration for many students. If you are interested in engineering fields, it's worth comparing electrical engineering online tuition costs to find programs that fit your budget while still offering a quality education.

For those looking to quickly increase their employability, it can be helpful to research easy certifications to get. These certifications can be completed in a short amount of time and may lead to well-compensated job opportunities in related tech fields.

If you are aiming to advance your education and career rapidly, check out the quickest masters degree online programs. These accelerated degrees can help you earn your credentials faster and enter the workforce sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Robert J. Piechocki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles