World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Reiner A. Veitia

Reiner A. Veitia

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
74
Citations
15437
World Ranking
1986
National Ranking
89

Reiner A. Veitia publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reiner A. Veitia sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 231 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Reiner A. Veitia D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reiner A. Veitia sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Reiner A. Veitia is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France and has contributed extensively to the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their research covers a broad spectrum of topics, focusing primarily on molecular and genetic mechanisms with applications in reproductive biology, chromatin dynamics, and genetic engineering.

The scientist's work prominently involves the study of FOXO transcription factor regulation, DNA repair mechanisms, and genetic and clinical aspects of sex determination and chromosomal abnormalities. Other primary research topics include chromosomal and genetic variations, reproductive biology and fertility, CRISPR and genetic engineering, and genomics and chromatin dynamics.

Frequent co-authors in their body of work include:

  • Anne-Laure Todeschini
  • Luís Aragón
  • Mohan Babu
  • Ronald Berezney
  • Hannah Correia

They have published many articles in a range of scientific journals, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • BioEssays
  • Clinical Genetics
  • Trends in Genetics
  • Human Genetics
  • Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology

Among the recent publications featuring their research contributions are:

  • "Forkhead Transcription Factors in Health and Disease," 2020, Trends in Genetics
  • "One Hundred Years of Gene Balance: How Stoichiometric Issues Affect Gene Expression, Genome Evolution, and Quantitative Traits," 2021, Cytogenetic and Genome Research
  • "Primary ovarian insufficiency, meiosis and DNA repair," 2020, Biomedical Journal
  • "A missense in HSF2BP causing primary ovarian insufficiency affects meiotic recombination by its novel interactor C19ORF57/BRME1," 2020, eLife
  • "The Oncogenic FOXL2 C134W Mutation Is a Key Driver of Granulosa Cell Tumors," 2022, Cancer Research

Veitia's research incorporates elements of molecular biology, genetics, plant science, public health, environmental and occupational health, and reproductive medicine. Their multidisciplinary approach reflects a comprehensive engagement with both fundamental biological processes and clinical applications.

The scientist was recognized with membership in the Academia Europaea in 2015, indicating involvement and acknowledgment within a European scholarly community.

Best Publications

  • Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines

    James A. Birchler;Reiner A. Veitia

  • The gene balance hypothesis: from classical genetics to modern genomics.

    James A. Birchler;Reiner A. Veitia

  • Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications.

    James A. Birchler;Nicole C. Riddle;Donald L. Auger;Reiner A. Veitia

  • The Gene Balance Hypothesis: implications for gene regulation, quantitative traits and evolution

    James A. Birchler;Reiner A. Veitia;Reiner A. Veitia

  • Exploring the etiology of haploinsufficiency.

    Reiner A. Veitia

  • Mutations and sequence variants in GDF9 and BMP15 in patients with premature ovarian failure

    Paul Laissue;Sophie Christin-Maitre;Philippe Touraine;Frederique Kuttenn

  • Evolution and expression of FOXL2

    J Cocquet;E Pailhoux;F Jaubert;N Servel

  • Spectrum of FOXL2 gene mutations in blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus (BPES) families demonstrates a genotype–phenotype correlation

    Elfride De Baere;Michael J. Dixon;Kent W. Small;Ethylin W. Jabs

  • Cellular reactions to gene dosage imbalance: genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic effects

    Reiner A. Veitia;Samuel Bottani;Samuel Bottani;Samuel Bottani;James A. Birchler

  • Mutant Cohesin in Premature Ovarian Failure

    Sandrine Caburet;Valerie A. Arboleda;Elena Llano;Paul A. Overbeek

  • FOXL2 and BPES: Mutational hotspots, phenotypic variability, and revision of the genotype-phenotype correlation

    Elfride De Baere;Diane Beysen;Christine Oley;Birgit Lorenz

  • FOXL2 activates P450 aromatase gene transcription: towards a better characterization of the early steps of mammalian ovarian development.

    Maëlle Pannetier;Stéphane Fabre;Frank Batista;Ayhan Kocer

  • The transience of transient overexpression

    Toby J Gibson;Markus Seiler;Reiner A Veitia

  • An evolutionary and functional analysis of FoxL2 in rainbow trout gonad differentiation.

    Daniel Baron;Julie Cocquet;Xuhua Xia;Marc Fellous

  • Transcription factors: specific DNA binding and specific gene regulation

    Anne-Laure Todeschini;Adrien Georges;Reiner A. Veitia

  • Structure, evolution and expression of the FOXL2 transcription unit

    J. Cocquet;E. De Baere;M. Gareil;M. Pannetier

  • FOXL2: a central transcription factor of the ovary.

    Adrien Georges;Aurelie Auguste;Laurianne Bessière;Anne Vanet

  • Recent male-mediated gene flow over a linguistic barrier in Iberia, suggested by analysis of a Y-chromosomal DNA polymorphism.

    Matthew E. Hurles;Reiner Veitia;Eduardo Arroyo;Manuel Armenteros

  • Gene dosage effects: nonlinearities, genetic interactions, and dosage compensation

    Reiner A. Veitia;Reiner A. Veitia;Samuel Bottani;James A. Birchler

  • Deletions Involving Long-Range Conserved Nongenic Sequences Upstream and Downstream of FOXL2 as a Novel Disease-Causing Mechanism in Blepharophimosis Syndrome

    D. Beysen;J. Raes;B.P. Leroy;B.P. Leroy;A. Lucassen

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Fellous
Marc Fellous Bayer Pharmaceuticals
Daniel Vaiman
Daniel Vaiman Université Paris Cité
Elfride De Baere
Elfride De Baere Ghent University
James A. Birchler
James A. Birchler University of Missouri
Ken McElreavey
Ken McElreavey Institut Pasteur
Elizabeth M. Simpson
Elizabeth M. Simpson University of British Columbia
Ludwine Messiaen
Ludwine Messiaen University of Alabama at Birmingham
Wyeth W. Wasserman
Wyeth W. Wasserman University of British Columbia
Peggy J. Farnham
Peggy J. Farnham University of Southern California
Bruce E. Torbett
Bruce E. Torbett Seattle Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics opens doors to a range of healthcare and science careers. Many students choose to tailor their education with relevant online degrees, making advanced study more accessible and affordable. For those aiming to blend genetics with clinical practice, pursuing an online nurse practitioner program is a popular route. This pathway enables graduates to apply genetic knowledge directly in patient care and personalized medicine.

Online nursing education continues to expand, offering online nursing degree programs that build a strong foundation in biology, research, and clinical skills. Students looking for leadership roles or specialized expertise often consider the best dnp programs online as a step toward nurse leadership and practice innovation.

Cost is a key issue for many prospective students, especially for those transitioning from a registered nurse to a bachelor's degree. Comparing rn to bsn online cost options is crucial to find programs that offer value and flexibility. These online pathways make careers in genetics-related fields more attainable, whether in research, healthcare, or education.

Best Scientists Citing Reiner A. Veitia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles