World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Reiner A. Veitia

Reiner A. Veitia

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 74 1986 1891 89 84 231 15437

Reiner A. Veitia publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Reiner A. Veitia between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Reiner A. Veitia published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 9.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2012. 13 of the 282 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2012. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 10 publications
1996 2025

282 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Reiner A. Veitia: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 5
1998 3
1999 6
2000 7
2001 12
2002 9
2003 8
2004 8
2005 10
2006 9
2007 10
2008 16
2009 12
2010 14
2011 9
2012 17
2013 7
2014 11
2015 9
2016 8
2017 14
2018 8
2019 11
2020 13
2021 12
2022 4
2023 16
2024 3
2025 10
Total 282
Download as CSV

Reiner A. Veitia publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reiner A. Veitia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 225–234 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 231 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143 231
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Reiner A. Veitia D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reiner A. Veitia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136 74
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Reiner A. Veitia is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France and has contributed extensively to the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their research covers a broad spectrum of topics, focusing primarily on molecular and genetic mechanisms with applications in reproductive biology, chromatin dynamics, and genetic engineering.

The scientist's work prominently involves the study of FOXO transcription factor regulation, DNA repair mechanisms, and genetic and clinical aspects of sex determination and chromosomal abnormalities. Other primary research topics include chromosomal and genetic variations, reproductive biology and fertility, CRISPR and genetic engineering, and genomics and chromatin dynamics.

Frequent co-authors in their body of work include:

  • Anne-Laure Todeschini
  • Luís Aragón
  • Mohan Babu
  • Ronald Berezney
  • Hannah Correia

They have published many articles in a range of scientific journals, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • BioEssays
  • Clinical Genetics
  • Trends in Genetics
  • Human Genetics
  • Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology

Among the recent publications featuring their research contributions are:

  • "Forkhead Transcription Factors in Health and Disease," 2020, Trends in Genetics
  • "One Hundred Years of Gene Balance: How Stoichiometric Issues Affect Gene Expression, Genome Evolution, and Quantitative Traits," 2021, Cytogenetic and Genome Research
  • "Primary ovarian insufficiency, meiosis and DNA repair," 2020, Biomedical Journal
  • "A missense in HSF2BP causing primary ovarian insufficiency affects meiotic recombination by its novel interactor C19ORF57/BRME1," 2020, eLife
  • "The Oncogenic FOXL2 C134W Mutation Is a Key Driver of Granulosa Cell Tumors," 2022, Cancer Research

Veitia's research incorporates elements of molecular biology, genetics, plant science, public health, environmental and occupational health, and reproductive medicine. Their multidisciplinary approach reflects a comprehensive engagement with both fundamental biological processes and clinical applications.

The scientist was recognized with membership in the Academia Europaea in 2015, indicating involvement and acknowledgment within a European scholarly community.

Best Publications

  • Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines

    James A. Birchler;Reiner A. Veitia

  • The gene balance hypothesis: from classical genetics to modern genomics.

    James A. Birchler;Reiner A. Veitia

  • Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications.

    James A. Birchler;Nicole C. Riddle;Donald L. Auger;Reiner A. Veitia

  • The Gene Balance Hypothesis: implications for gene regulation, quantitative traits and evolution

    James A. Birchler;Reiner A. Veitia;Reiner A. Veitia

  • Exploring the etiology of haploinsufficiency.

    Reiner A. Veitia

  • Mutations and sequence variants in GDF9 and BMP15 in patients with premature ovarian failure

    Paul Laissue;Sophie Christin-Maitre;Philippe Touraine;Frederique Kuttenn

  • Evolution and expression of FOXL2

    J Cocquet;E Pailhoux;F Jaubert;N Servel

  • Spectrum of FOXL2 gene mutations in blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus (BPES) families demonstrates a genotype–phenotype correlation

    Elfride De Baere;Michael J. Dixon;Kent W. Small;Ethylin W. Jabs

  • Cellular reactions to gene dosage imbalance: genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic effects

    Reiner A. Veitia;Samuel Bottani;Samuel Bottani;Samuel Bottani;James A. Birchler

  • Mutant Cohesin in Premature Ovarian Failure

    Sandrine Caburet;Valerie A. Arboleda;Elena Llano;Paul A. Overbeek

  • FOXL2 and BPES: Mutational hotspots, phenotypic variability, and revision of the genotype-phenotype correlation

    Elfride De Baere;Diane Beysen;Christine Oley;Birgit Lorenz

  • FOXL2 activates P450 aromatase gene transcription: towards a better characterization of the early steps of mammalian ovarian development.

    Maëlle Pannetier;Stéphane Fabre;Frank Batista;Ayhan Kocer

  • The transience of transient overexpression

    Toby J Gibson;Markus Seiler;Reiner A Veitia

  • An evolutionary and functional analysis of FoxL2 in rainbow trout gonad differentiation.

    Daniel Baron;Julie Cocquet;Xuhua Xia;Marc Fellous

  • Transcription factors: specific DNA binding and specific gene regulation

    Anne-Laure Todeschini;Adrien Georges;Reiner A. Veitia

  • Structure, evolution and expression of the FOXL2 transcription unit

    J. Cocquet;E. De Baere;M. Gareil;M. Pannetier

  • FOXL2: a central transcription factor of the ovary.

    Adrien Georges;Aurelie Auguste;Laurianne Bessière;Anne Vanet

  • Recent male-mediated gene flow over a linguistic barrier in Iberia, suggested by analysis of a Y-chromosomal DNA polymorphism.

    Matthew E. Hurles;Reiner Veitia;Eduardo Arroyo;Manuel Armenteros

  • Gene dosage effects: nonlinearities, genetic interactions, and dosage compensation

    Reiner A. Veitia;Reiner A. Veitia;Samuel Bottani;James A. Birchler

  • Deletions Involving Long-Range Conserved Nongenic Sequences Upstream and Downstream of FOXL2 as a Novel Disease-Causing Mechanism in Blepharophimosis Syndrome

    D. Beysen;J. Raes;B.P. Leroy;B.P. Leroy;A. Lucassen

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Fellous
Marc Fellous Bayer Pharmaceuticals
Daniel Vaiman
Daniel Vaiman Université Paris Cité
Elfride De Baere
Elfride De Baere Ghent University
James A. Birchler
James A. Birchler University of Missouri
Ken McElreavey
Ken McElreavey Institut Pasteur
Elizabeth M. Simpson
Elizabeth M. Simpson University of British Columbia
Ludwine Messiaen
Ludwine Messiaen University of Alabama at Birmingham
Wyeth W. Wasserman
Wyeth W. Wasserman University of British Columbia
Peggy J. Farnham
Peggy J. Farnham University of Southern California
Bruce E. Torbett
Bruce E. Torbett Seattle Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics opens doors to a range of healthcare and science careers. Many students choose to tailor their education with relevant online degrees, making advanced study more accessible and affordable. For those aiming to blend genetics with clinical practice, pursuing an online nurse practitioner program is a popular route. This pathway enables graduates to apply genetic knowledge directly in patient care and personalized medicine.

Online nursing education continues to expand, offering online nursing degree programs that build a strong foundation in biology, research, and clinical skills. Students looking for leadership roles or specialized expertise often consider the best dnp programs online as a step toward nurse leadership and practice innovation.

Cost is a key issue for many prospective students, especially for those transitioning from a registered nurse to a bachelor's degree. Comparing rn to bsn online cost options is crucial to find programs that offer value and flexibility. These online pathways make careers in genetics-related fields more attainable, whether in research, healthcare, or education.

Best Scientists Citing Reiner A. Veitia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles