World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 93 969 915 477 447 220 34394

Michael Freeling publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Freeling between 1973 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Freeling published across 52 years, from 1973 to 2024, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 1992. 3 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 1992. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 4 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication
1973 2024

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Freeling: publications per year, 1973 to 2024
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 1
1976 2
1977 1
1978 4
1979 1
1980 3
1981 3
1982 3
1983 2
1984 8
1985 4
1986 6
1987 3
1988 5
1989 6
1990 8
1991 4
1992 13
1993 4
1994 8
1995 4
1996 6
1997 6
1998 6
1999 5
2000 2
2001 5
2002 4
2003 7
2004 3
2005 4
2006 6
2007 2
2008 7
2009 7
2010 6
2011 11
2012 13
2013 3
2014 5
2015 6
2016 2
2017 2
2018 3
2019 3
2020 2
2021 5
2022 2
2023 2
2024 1
Total 231
Download as CSV

Michael Freeling publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Freeling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 215–224 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 220 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134 220
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Freeling D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Freeling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72 93
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1980 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Michael Freeling is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a specific focus on Plant Science and Molecular Biology subfields.

Their work covers several main topics including chromosomal and genetic variations, genomics and phylogenetic studies, plant disease resistance and genetics, plant molecular biology research, plant reproductive biology, and plant nutrient uptake and metabolism.

Freeling has contributed to numerous research articles published in notable scientific venues. These include the journal bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Genome Biology, Genome Research, and Bioinformatics.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Freeling include:

  • Impacts of allopolyploidization and structural variation on intraspecific diversification in Brassica rapa, 2021, Genome Biology
  • Abundant expression of maternal siRNAs is a conserved feature of seed development, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • The contributions from the progenitor genomes of the mesopolyploid Brassiceae are evolutionarily distinct but functionally compatible, 2021, Genome Research
  • qTeller: a tool for comparative multi-genomic gene expression analysis, 2021, Bioinformatics
  • Ovule siRNAs methylate protein-coding genes in trans, 2022, The Plant Cell

Frequent collaborators in their research include Jianli Liang, Jian Wu, Xiaowu Wang, Kang Zhang, and Lingkui Zhang.

Michael Freeling's recognition includes membership in the National Academy of Sciences appointed in 1994 and being named a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1980.

Best Publications

  • The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses

    Andrew H. Paterson;John E. Bowers;Rémy Bruggmann;Inna Dubchak

  • The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa

    Xiaowu Wang;Hanzhong Wang;Jun Wang;Jun Wang;Jun Wang

  • The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants

    Angélique D'hont;Jean Marc Aury;Franc Christophe Baurens

  • The draft genome of the transgenic tropical fruit tree papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus)

    Ray Ming;Shaobin Hou;Yun Feng;Qingyi Yu

  • The maize handbook

    Michael Freeling;Virginia Walbot

  • Bias in Plant Gene Content Following Different Sorts of Duplication: Tandem, Whole-Genome, Segmental, or by Transposition

    Michael Freeling

  • The anaerobic proteins of maize.

    Martin M. Sachs;Michael Freeling;Ronald Okimoto

  • Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss

    James C. Schnable;Nathan M. Springer;Michael Freeling

  • Origin and evolution of the octoploid strawberry genome.

    Patrick P. Edger;Thomas J. Poorten;Robert VanBuren;Michael A. Hardigan

  • The pineapple genome and the evolution of CAM photosynthesis

    Ray Ming;Ray Ming;Robert VanBuren;Robert VanBuren;Robert VanBuren;Ching Man Wai;Ching Man Wai;Haibao Tang;Haibao Tang

  • How to usefully compare homologous plant genes and chromosomes as DNA sequences.

    Eric Lyons;Michael Freeling

  • Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity

    Michael Freeling;Brian C. Thomas

  • Following tetraploidy in an Arabidopsis ancestor, genes were removed preferentially from one homeolog leaving clusters enriched in dose-sensitive genes

    Brian C. Thomas;Brent Pedersen;Michael Freeling

  • Finding and Comparing Syntenic Regions among Arabidopsis and the Outgroups Papaya, Poplar, and Grape: CoGe with Rosids

    Eric Lyons;Brent Pedersen;Josh Kane;Maqsudul Alam

  • Grasses as a single genetic system: genome composition, collinearity and compatibility

    Jeffrey L. Bennetzin;Michael Freeling

  • The Maize rough sheath2 Gene and Leaf Development Programs in Monocot and Dicot Plants

    Miltos Tsiantis;Richard Schneeberger;John F. Golz;Michael Freeling

  • Cytoplasmic acidosis as a determinant of flooding intolerance in plants

    Justin K. M. Roberts;Judy Callis;Oleg Jardetzky;Virginia Walbot

  • Single-molecule sequencing of the desiccation-tolerant grass Oropetium thomaeum.

    Robert VanBuren;Doug Bryant;Patrick P. Edger;Patrick P. Edger;Haibao Tang;Haibao Tang

  • liguleless1 encodes a nuclear-localized protein required for induction of ligules and auricles during maize leaf organogenesis.

    M A Moreno;L C Harper;R W Krueger;S L Dellaporta

  • Extensive gene content variation in the Brachypodium distachyon pan-genome correlates with population structure

    Sean P. Gordon;Bruno Contreras-Moreira;Daniel P. Woods;Daniel P. Woods;David L. Des Marais;David L. Des Marais

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Lyons
Eric Lyons University of Arizona
Damon Lisch
Damon Lisch Purdue University West Lafayette
Haibao Tang
Haibao Tang Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
Sarah Hake
Sarah Hake University of California, Berkeley
J. Chris Pires
J. Chris Pires Colorado State University
Patrick P. Edger
Patrick P. Edger Michigan State University
Xiaowu Wang
Xiaowu Wang Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore
Andrew H. Paterson
Andrew H. Paterson University of Georgia
Xiyin Wang
Xiyin Wang North China University of Science and Technology
Blake C. Meyers
Blake C. Meyers University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in genetics opens doors to a variety of related fields within healthcare and life sciences. Students interested in combining genetics studies with in-demand health sector skills might consider pursuing programs like medical billing and coding. These certifications provide foundational knowledge in healthcare systems, records management, and regulatory compliance, all essential for supporting genomics research and clinical practice.

For those interested in direct patient care, looking into the easiest bsn program to get into can lead to a rewarding nursing career—where genetic knowledge is increasingly valuable in patient education and care planning. Alternatively, if management or policy appeals more, a healthcare administration degree or a health administration degree can position you for leadership roles. These online degrees make it easier to balance professional obligations with education, while offering specialized pathways that complement a background in genetics.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Freeling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles