World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Rebecca M. Flowers publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca M. Flowers sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Rebecca M. Flowers D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca M. Flowers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rebecca M. Flowers is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States, focusing primarily on research within Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work spans several subfields including Geophysics, Atmospheric Science, Artificial Intelligence applications, Paleontology, and Earth-Surface Processes.

The scope of their research covers a variety of main topics such as Geological and Geochemical Analysis, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, earthquake and tectonic studies, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils, Geological formations and processes, and Geological and Geophysical Studies.

Among their published papers, some notable recent works include:

  • (U-Th)/He chronology: Part 2. Considerations for evaluating, integrating, and interpreting conventional individual aliquot data, 2022, Geological Society of America Bulletin
  • Diachronous development of Great Unconformities before Neoproterozoic Snowball Earth, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • (U-Th)/He chronology: Part 1. Data, uncertainty, and reporting, 2022, Geological Society of America Bulletin
  • The Late Great Unconformity of the Central Canadian Shield, 2021, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
  • River patterns reveal two stages of landscape evolution at an oblique convergent margin, Marlborough Fault System, New Zealand, 2020, Earth Surface Dynamics

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Francis A. Macdonald, James R. Metcalf, Liam Courtney-Davies, Barra A. Peak, and C. S. Siddoway. These collaborations highlight a network of research within geological and geophysical sciences.

Their work has appeared in a variety of academic venues. Predominantly, publications have been featured in:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Geochronology
  • Geological Society of America Bulletin

Best Publications

  • Apatite (U-Th)/He thermochronometry using a radiation damage accumulation and annealing model

    Rebecca M. Flowers;Richard A. Ketcham;David L. Shuster;Kenneth A. Farley

  • The influence of natural radiation damage on helium diffusion kinetics in apatite

    David L. Shuster;Rebecca M. Flowers;Kenneth A. Farley

  • Unroofing, incision, and uplift history of the southwestern Colorado Plateau from apatite (U-Th)/He thermochronometry

    R.M. Flowers;B.P. Wernicke;K.A. Farley

  • Radiation damage control on apatite (U-Th)/He dates from the Grand Canyon region, Colorado Plateau

    R.M. Flowers;D.L. Shuster;B.P. Wernicke;K.A. Farley

  • New zircon shock phenomena and their use for dating and reconstruction of large impact structures revealed by electron nanobeam (EBSD, CL, EDS) and isotopic U–Pb and (U–Th)/He analysis of the Vredefort domeThis article is one of a series of papers published in this Special Issue on the theme of Geochronology in honour of Tom Krogh.

    Unknown

  • Interpreting data dispersion and “inverted” dates in apatite (U–Th)/He and fission-track datasets: An example from the US midcontinent

    Rebecca M. Flowers;Shari A. Kelley

  • Exploiting radiation damage control on apatite (U–Th)/He dates in cratonic regions

    Rebecca M. Flowers

  • Apatite 4He/3He and (U-Th)/He Evidence for an Ancient Grand Canyon

    R. M. Flowers;K. A. Farley

  • A reporting protocol for thermochronologic modeling illustrated with data from the Grand Canyon

    Rebecca M. Flowers;Kenneth A. Farley;Richard A. Ketcham

  • Birth of the Kaapvaal Tectosphere 3.08 Billion Years Ago

    D. E. Moser;R. M. Flowers;R. J. Hart

  • (U-Th)/He thermochronometry constraints on unroofing of the eastern Kaapvaal craton and significance for uplift of the southern African Plateau

    Rebecca M. Flowers;Blair Schoene

  • Is apatite U–Th zonation information necessary for accurate interpretation of apatite (U–Th)/He thermochronometry data?

    Alexis K. Ault;Rebecca M. Flowers

  • Timescales and significance of high-pressure, high-temperature metamorphism and mafic dike anatexis, Snowbird tectonic zone, Canada

    R. M. Flowers;R. M. Flowers;S. A. Bowring;M. L. Williams

  • (U-Th)/He chronology: Part 2. Considerations for evaluating, integrating, and interpreting conventional individual aliquot data

    Unknown

  • (U-Th)/He chronology: Part 1. Data, uncertainty, and reporting

    Unknown

  • Multistage exhumation and juxtaposition of lower continental crust in the western Canadian Shield: Linking high‐resolution U‐Pb and 40Ar/39Ar thermochronometry with pressure‐temperature‐deformation paths

    R. M. Flowers;R. M. Flowers;K. H. Mahan;K. H. Mahan;S. A. Bowring;M. L. Williams

  • Tempo of burial and exhumation within the deep roots of a magmatic arc, Fiordland, New Zealand

    R.M. Flowers;S.A. Bowring;A.J. Tulloch;K.A. Klepeis

  • (U–Th)/Ne and multidomain (U–Th)/He systematics of a hydrothermal hematite from eastern Grand Canyon

    K. A. Farley;R. M. Flowers

  • Kimberlite (U-Th)/He dating links surface erosion with lithospheric heating, thinning, and metasomatism in the southern African Plateau

    Jessica R. Stanley;Rebecca M. Flowers;David R. Bell

  • Low long-term erosion rates and extreme continental stability documented by ancient (U-Th)/He dates

    R.M. Flowers;S.A. Bowring;P.W. Reiners

  • “Inverted” zircon and apatite (U–Th)/He dates from the Front Range, Colorado: High-damage zircon as a low-temperature (<50 °C) thermochronometer

    Joshua E. Johnson;Rebecca M. Flowers;Graham B. Baird;Kevin H. Mahan

  • Phanerozoic burial and unroofing history of the western Slave craton and Wopmay orogen from apatite (U–Th)/He thermochronometry

    Alexis K. Ault;Rebecca M. Flowers;Samuel A. Bowring

  • Geochronological constraints on the Legs Lake shear zone with implications for regional exhumation of lower continental crust, western Churchill Province, Canadian Shield

    K. H. Mahan;K. H. Mahan;M. L. Williams;R. M. Flowers;M. J. Jercinovic

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth A. Farley
Kenneth A. Farley California Institute of Technology
Gregory E. Tucker
Gregory E. Tucker University of Colorado Boulder
Brian P. Wernicke
Brian P. Wernicke California Institute of Technology
Stephen J. Mojzsis
Stephen J. Mojzsis University of Bayreuth
Francis A. Macdonald
Francis A. Macdonald University of California, Santa Barbara
Shijie Zhong
Shijie Zhong University of Colorado Boulder
David L. Shuster
David L. Shuster University of California, Berkeley
Blair Schoene
Blair Schoene Princeton University
Richard A. Ketcham
Richard A. Ketcham The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, often complemented by additional skills and knowledge from other fields. For instance, language proficiency can enhance communication in global environmental projects, making an online degree in Spanish a valuable asset.

Veterans interested in expanding their expertise may find supportive options like Spanish programs online for veterans, which provide tailored guidance and flexible learning environments.

Creative professionals passionate about environmental topics can also explore interdisciplinary avenues such as an online MFA visual arts, blending scientific insights with artistic expression to raise awareness through compelling visuals.

Those aspiring to leadership roles within environmental organizations might consider an accredited online masters degree in human resource management to develop essential management skills that complement their scientific expertise.

Combining Earth Science with these related online degrees can enhance career flexibility and open new opportunities in research, education, conservation, and industry.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca M. Flowers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles