World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
30573
World Ranking
4281
National Ranking
2382

Ralph M. Reitan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralph M. Reitan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 171 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ralph M. Reitan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralph M. Reitan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1974 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Ralph M. Reitan was affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their contributions to neuropsychology include work on test batteries used for clinical assessment.

Among their recent papers is "Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery," published in 2021 in PsycTESTS Dataset.

  • Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (2021), PsycTESTS Dataset

Reitan frequently collaborated with Ward C. Halstead, a notable co-author in their research efforts.

  • Ward C. Halstead

Their publications appeared in venues including:

  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Ralph M. Reitan was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1974.

Best Publications

  • Validity of the Trail Making Test as an Indicator of Organic Brain Damage

    Ralph M. Reitan

  • The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation

    Ralph M. Reitan;Deborah Wolfson

  • The relation of the Trail Making Test to organic brain damage.

    Ralph M. Reitan

  • Clinical neuropsychology: Current status and applications.

    Ralph M. Reitan;Leslie A. Davison

  • Investigation of the validity of Halstead's measures of biological intelligence.

    Ralph M. Reitan

  • Category test and trail making test as measures of frontal lobe functions

    Ralph M. Reitan;Deborah Wolfson

  • Certain differential effects of left and right cerebral lesions in human adults.

    Ralph M. Reitan

  • A Research Program on the Psychological Effects of Brain Lesions in Human Beings1

    Ralph M. Reitan

  • A selective and critical review of neuropsychological deficits and the frontal lobes.

    Ralph M. Reitan;Deborah Wolfson

  • Adaptive abilities and intellectual functioning of hospitalized alcoholics: further considerations.

    Loren C. Fitzhugh;Kathleen B. Fitzhugh;Ralph M. Reitan

  • The Trail Making Test as an initial screening procedure for neuropsychological impairment in older children.

    Ralph M. Reitan;Deborah Wolfson

  • Adaptive abilities and intellectual functioning in hospitalized alcoholics.

    Loren C. Fitzhugh;Kathleen B. Fitzhugh;Ralph M. Reitan

  • Differential effects of lateralized brain lesions on the trail making test.

    Ralph M. Reitan;Elaine L. Tarshes

  • The comparative effects of brain damage on the halstead impairment index and the wechsler‐bellevue scale

    Ralph M. Reitan

  • INFLUENCE OF CEREBRAL LESIONS ON PSYCHOLOGICAL TEST PERFORMANCES OF OLDER CHILDREN.

    Homer B. C. Reed Jr.;Ralph M. Reitan;Hallgrim KłOve

  • Influence of age and education on neuropsychological test results

    Ralph M. Reitan;Deborah Wolfson

  • An application of discriminant functions to the problem of predicting brain damage using behavioral variables.

    Lawrence Wheeler;Cletus J. Burke;Ralph M. Reitan

  • Wechsler-Bellevue comparisons in groups with 'chronic' and 'current' lateralized and diffuse brain lesions.

    Kathleen B. Fitzhugh;Loren C. Fitzhugh;Ralph M. Reitan

  • Rules for neuropsychological diagnosis: classification of brain function in older children.

    Marion Selz;Ralph M. Reitan

  • Neuropsychological correlates of rapidly vs. slowly growing intrinsic cerebral neoplasms.

    Jim Hom;Ralph M. Reitan

  • 3/The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery and Aging

    Ralph M. Reitan;Deborah Wolfson

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert K. Heaton
Robert K. Heaton University of California, San Diego
Kenneth M. Adams
Kenneth M. Adams University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Linas A. Bieliauskas
Linas A. Bieliauskas University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas A. Hammeke
Thomas A. Hammeke Medical College of Wisconsin
Carl B. Dodrill
Carl B. Dodrill University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens diverse pathways in mental health, counseling, and therapy. One of the most popular specializations is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), which requires both academic credentials and state-specific certifications.

If you are interested in this field, begin by researching educational qualifications in your area. For instance, Bakersfield mft education requirements highlight the importance of acquiring a relevant graduate degree, such as a Master’s in Marriage and Family Therapy. Similarly, Baltimore mft certification requirements detail the steps necessary for licensure, including supervised clinical hours and passing a recognized exam.

Not every city or state has the same process. For a regional perspective, see how to progress in Idaho with how to become a marriage and family therapist in Boise. For Massachusetts, review Boston mft education requirements to understand local licensure demands.

Online psychology degrees can help you start or advance your career, but always confirm state-specific requirements for clinical licensure. Researching paths in your target location ensures you meet all standards to practice as a qualified therapist.

Best Scientists Citing Ralph M. Reitan

Recently Published Articles