World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 42 6744 6513 120 120 181 5316

Rajib Chowdhury publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rajib Chowdhury between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rajib Chowdhury published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2010. 22 of the 204 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2010. 1970: 3 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 9 publications
1970 2025

204 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rajib Chowdhury: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 3
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 1
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 2
1985 4
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 0
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 1
2006 1
2007 3
2008 5
2009 8
2010 19
2011 17
2012 10
2013 8
2014 4
2015 8
2016 9
2017 17
2018 7
2019 12
2020 7
2021 2
2022 8
2023 9
2024 13
2025 9
Total 204
Download as CSV

Rajib Chowdhury publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rajib Chowdhury sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 181 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421 181
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Rajib Chowdhury D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rajib Chowdhury sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426 42
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Rajib Chowdhury is affiliated with the Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee in India. Their research primarily focuses on engineering, particularly within the subfields of civil and structural engineering, mechanics of materials, computational mechanics, materials chemistry, and mechanical engineering.

Their work spans several topics in engineering including:

  • Topology Optimization in Engineering
  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
  • Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • Cellular and Composite Structures
  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques

Chowdhury has a collection of recent papers illustrating their contributions to these topics. Selected papers include:

  • Anti-impact behavior of auxetic sandwich structure with braided face sheets and 3D re-entrant cores, 2020, Composite Structures
  • An adaptive mesh refinement algorithm for phase-field fracture models: Application to brittle, cohesive, and dynamic fracture, 2022, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • A length scale insensitive phase field model for brittle fracture of hyperelastic solids, 2020, Engineering Fracture Mechanics
  • Robust topology optimization of negative Poisson's ratio metamaterials under material uncertainty, 2021, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design
  • An auto-adaptive sub-stepping algorithm for phase-field modeling of brittle fracture, 2020, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics

Their frequent coauthors include Abhinav Gupta, Anupam Chakrabarti, U. Meenu Krishnan, Arya Prakash Padhi, and Praveen Verma, reflecting collaborative efforts across their body of work.

Rajib Chowdhury's publications often appear in specific venues that highlight the focus of their research. The frequent publication venues include:

  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Engineering Fracture Mechanics
  • Composite Structures
  • Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics

Best Publications

  • Effective mechanical properties of hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets

    L Boldrin;FL Scarpa;Chowdhury R;S Adhikari

  • Risk factors for kala-azar in Bangladesh.

    Caryn Bern;Allen W. Hightower;Rajib Chowdhury;Mustakim Ali

  • Vibrating carbon nanotube based bio-sensors

    R. Chowdhury;S. Adhikari;J. Mitchell

  • A Critical Review of Surrogate Assisted Robust Design Optimization

    Tanmoy Chatterjee;Souvik Chakraborty;Rajib Chowdhury

  • A molecular mechanics approach for the vibration of single-walled carbon nanotubes

    R. Chowdhury;S. Adhikari;C.Y. Wang;F. Scarpa

  • The epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in Bangladesh: prospects for improved control.

    Caryn Bern;Rajib Chowdhury

  • High-dimensional model representation for structural reliability analysis

    Rajib Chowdhury;B. N. Rao;A. Meher Prasad

  • A critical assessment of Kriging model variants for high-fidelity uncertainty quantification in dynamics of composite shells

    T. Mukhopadhyay;S. Chakraborty;S. Dey;Sondipon Adhikari

  • THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF VISCERAL LEISHMANIASIS AND ASYMPTOMATIC LEISHMANIAL INFECTION IN A HIGHLY ENDEMIC BANGLADESHI VILLAGE

    Caryn Bern;Rashidul Haque;Rajib Chowdhury;Mustakim Ali

  • VISCERAL LEISHMANIASIS: CONSEQUENCES OF A NEGLECTED DISEASE IN A BANGLADESHI COMMUNITY

    Indu B. Ahluwalia;Caryn Bern;Cristiane Costa;Tangin Akter

  • Curved-layer fused deposition modelling

    S. Singamneni;O. Diegel;B. Huang;I. Gibson

  • Chemical and environmental vector control as a contribution to the elimination of visceral leishmaniasis on the Indian subcontinent: cluster randomized controlled trials in Bangladesh, India and Nepal

    Anand B Joshi;Murari L Das;Shireen Akhter;Rajib Chowdhury

  • Anti-impact behavior of auxetic sandwich structure with braided face sheets and 3D re-entrant cores

    Rohit Raju Madke;Rajib Chowdhury

  • The economic impact of visceral leishmaniasis on households in Bangladesh.

    D. Anoopa Sharma;Caryn Bern;Beena Varghese;Rajib Chowdhury

  • Assessment of high dimensional model representation techniques for reliability analysis

    Rajib Chowdhury;B.N. Rao

  • An adaptive mesh refinement algorithm for phase-field fracture models: Application to brittle, cohesive, and dynamic fracture

    Unknown

  • Vibration frequency of graphene based composites: A multiscale approach

    Y. Chandra;R. Chowdhury;F. Scarpa;S. Adhikari

  • Graphene-based biosensor using transport properties

    R. Chowdhury;S. Adhikari;P. Rees;S. P. Wilks

  • Transverse vibration of single-layer graphene sheets

    R Chowdhury;S Adhikari;Fabrizio Scarpa;MI Friswell

  • Structural Damage Identification Using Response Surface-Based Multi-objective Optimization: A Comparative Study

    Tanmoy Mukhopadhyay;Tushar Kanti Dey;Rajib Chowdhury;Anupam Chakrabarti

  • Hybrid High Dimensional Model Representation for reliability analysis

    Rajib Chowdhury;B.N. Rao

  • The calibration of carbon nanotube based bionanosensors

    S. Adhikari;R. Chowdhury

  • Reliability model of progressive slope failure

    R N Chowdhury;W H Tang;I Sidi

  • Boron-Nitride Nanotubes as Zeptogram-Scale Bionanosensors: Theoretical Investigations

    R. Chowdhury;S. Adhikari

  • Compression and Degradation of Railway Ballast Under One-Dimensional Loading

    Buddhima Indraratna;D. Ionescu;D. Christie;R. Chowdhury

  • $F^2$Dock: Fast Fourier Protein-Protein Docking

    Chandrajit L. Bajaj;Rezaul Chowdhury;Vinay Siddahanavalli

Frequent Co-Authors

Sondipon Adhikari
Sondipon Adhikari University of Glasgow
Fabrizio Scarpa
Fabrizio Scarpa University of Bristol
R. Jayaganthan
R. Jayaganthan Indian Institute of Technology Madras
Caryn Bern
Caryn Bern University of California, San Francisco
Anupam Chakrabarti
Anupam Chakrabarti Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
Aditya P. Dash
Aditya P. Dash Central University of Tamil Nadu
Dinesh Mondal
Dinesh Mondal International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research
Rashidul Haque
Rashidul Haque International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research
Robert F. Breiman
Robert F. Breiman Emory University
Tanmoy Mukhopadhyay
Tanmoy Mukhopadhyay University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology in the USA can open the door to many interdisciplinary options and flexible career paths—especially through online degree programs. Today’s market demands professionals who can combine technical skill with specialized industry knowledge. For example, a bachelors in social media marketing can enhance your ability to apply analytical and creative digital strategies, complementing an engineering background.

For students interested in service industries, an online hospitality management degree offers management training relevant to technology-driven businesses and event operations. Those aiming for leadership can pursue advancement through the cheapest online mba aacsb programs, which provide a strong foundation in business management and technical decision-making.

Finally, there’s also strong demand for professionals well-versed in legal and regulatory issues in tech. Completing an aba approved paralegal programs online can develop your expertise in compliance and intellectual property. All these pathways make it easier to diversify your skill set and expand your career options in today’s dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Rajib Chowdhury

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles