World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 51 5615 5163 330 300 202 7070

Philippe Sarret publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philippe Sarret between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philippe Sarret published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2021. 24 of the 217 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2021. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 11 publications
1996 2025

217 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philippe Sarret: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 4
1999 3
2000 2
2001 2
2002 3
2003 2
2004 2
2005 2
2006 1
2007 4
2008 5
2009 3
2010 11
2011 10
2012 8
2013 11
2014 10
2015 9
2016 13
2017 10
2018 14
2019 18
2020 15
2021 19
2022 4
2023 6
2024 13
2025 11
Total 217
Download as CSV

Philippe Sarret publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Sarret sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 198–207 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 202 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306 202
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Philippe Sarret D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Sarret sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425 51
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Philippe Sarret is affiliated with the Université de Sherbrooke in Canada and has contributed extensively to fields that include Medicine, Neuroscience, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research encompasses various subfields such as Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Pharmacology, and Surgery.

Their primary research topics involve Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology, Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling, Pain Mechanisms and Treatments, Apelin-related biomedical research, Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research, Chemical Synthesis and Analysis, and Nuclear Receptors and Signaling.

Philippe Sarret has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Jean-Michel Longpré (29 collaborations)
  • Jérôme Côté (20 collaborations)
  • Rebecca L. Brouillette (16 collaborations)
  • Élie Besserer-Offroy (16 collaborations)
  • Éric Marsault (16 collaborations)

Their publications have appeared in key scientific venues, most notably:

  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (8 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (6 publications)
  • Pharmacological Research (4 publications)
  • Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy (2 publications)
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences (2 publications)

Selected recent papers include:

  • "Mechanistic insights into the role of the chemokine CCL2/CCR2 axis in dorsal root ganglia to peripheral inflammation and pain hypersensitivity," 2021, Journal of Neuroinflammation
  • "Optogenetic stimulation of glutamatergic neurons in the cuneiform nucleus controls locomotion in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Brain irradiation leads to persistent neuroinflammation and long-term neurocognitive dysfunction in a region-specific manner," 2020, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
  • "Freely Behaving Mice Can Brake and Turn During Optogenetic Stimulation of the Mesencephalic Locomotor Region," 2021, Frontiers in Neural Circuits
  • "Structural insight into apelin receptor-G protein stoichiometry," 2022, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Best Publications

  • Structure, functional expression, and cerebral localization of the levocabastine-sensitive neurotensin/neuromedin N receptor from mouse brain.

    Jean Mazella;Jean-Marie Botto;Eric Guillemare;Thierry Coppola

  • CCL2 Released from Neuronal Synaptic Vesicles in the Spinal Cord Is a Major Mediator of Local Inflammation and Pain after Peripheral Nerve Injury

    Juliette Van Steenwinckel;Annabelle Reaux-Le Goazigo;Blandine Pommier;Annie Mauborgne

  • Spinal CCL2 pronociceptive action is no longer effective in CCR2 receptor antagonist-treated rats

    Marc-André Dansereau;Romain-Daniel Gosselin;Michel Pohl;Blandine Pommier

  • Distribution of NTS3 receptor/sortilin mRNA and protein in the rat central nervous system

    Philippe Sarret;Pascale Krzywkowski;Laura Segal;Morten S. Nielsen

  • Identification of the Receptor Subtype Involved in the Analgesic Effect of Neurotensin

    Isabelle Dubuc;Philippe Sarret;Catherine Labbé-Jullié;Jean-Marie Botto

  • Increased anxiety-like behaviors in rats experiencing chronic inflammatory pain.

    Alexandre J. Parent;Nicolas Beaudet;Hélène Beaudry;Jenny Bergeron

  • Combination of high-fat/high-fructose diet and low-dose streptozotocin to model long-term type-2 diabetes complications.

    David André Barrière;Christophe Noll;Geneviève Roussy;Farah Lizotte

  • Neurochemokines: a menage a trois providing new insights on the functions of chemokines in the central nervous system.

    William Rostène;Marc-André Dansereau;David Godefroy;Juliette Van Steenwinckel

  • Developmental motor deficits induced by combined fetal exposure to lipopolysaccharide and early neonatal hypoxia/ischemia: A novel animal model for cerebral palsy in very premature infants

    Sylvie Girard;Hazim Kadhim;Nicolas Beaudet;Philippe Sarret

  • Immunohistochemical distribution of NTS2 neurotensin receptors in the rat central nervous system.

    Philippe Sarret;Amélie Perron;Thomas Stroh;Alain Beaudet

  • Discovery and Structure–Activity Relationship of a Bioactive Fragment of ELABELA that Modulates Vascular and Cardiac Functions

    Alexandre Murza;Xavier Sainsily;David Coquerel;Jérôme Côté

  • Conjugation of a brain-penetrant peptide with neurotensin provides antinociceptive properties

    Michel Demeule;Nicolas Beaudet;Anthony Régina;Élie Besserer-Offroy

  • Postnatal administration of IL-1Ra exerts neuroprotective effects following perinatal inflammation and/or hypoxic-ischemic injuries

    Sylvie Girard;Hugues Sébire;Marie-Elsa Brochu;Sinziana Briota

  • Involvement of the neurotensin receptor subtype NTR3 in the growth effect of neurotensin on cancer cell lines.

    Claude Dal Farra;Philippe Sarret;Valérie Navarro;Jean‐Marie Botto

  • Elucidating the active δ-opioid receptor crystal structure with peptide and small-molecule agonists

    Tobias Claff;Tobias Claff;Jing Yu;Véronique Blais;Nilkanth Patel

  • The Chemokine CCL2 Increases Nav1.8 Sodium Channel Activity in Primary Sensory Neurons through a Gβγ-Dependent Mechanism

    Mounir Belkouch;Marc-André Dansereau;Annabelle Réaux-Le Goazigo;Juliette Van Steenwinckel

  • Weight bearing evaluation in inflammatory, neuropathic and cancer chronic pain in freely moving rats.

    Pascal Tétreault;Marc-André Dansereau;Louis Doré-Savard;Nicolas Beaudet

  • Structure-based mechanism of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor inhibition by antiasthmatic drugs

    Aleksandra Luginina;Anastasiia Gusach;Egor Marin;Alexey Mishin

  • Elucidation of the structure-activity relationships of apelin: influence of unnatural amino acids on binding, signaling, and plasma stability.

    Alexandre Murza;Alexandre Parent;Elie Besserer-Offroy;Hugo Tremblay

  • Chemokine network in the nervous system: a new target for pain relief.

    R. D. Gosselin;M. A. Dansereau;M. Pohl;P. Kitabgi

  • Stable Expression of the Mouse Levocabastine-Sensitive Neurotensin Receptor in HEK 293 Cell Line: Binding Properties, Photoaffinity Labeling, and Internalization Mechanism☆

    Jean-Marie Botto;Joëlle Chabry;Philippe Sarret;Jean-Pierre Vincent

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Mazella
Jean Mazella Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Pierre Vincent
Jean-Pierre Vincent Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean Martinez
Jean Martinez University of Montpellier
Richard Leduc
Richard Leduc Université de Sherbrooke
Vadim Cherezov
Vadim Cherezov University of Southern California
Patrick Kitabgi
Patrick Kitabgi Grenoble Alpes University
Serge Marchand
Serge Marchand Université de Sherbrooke
Martin Lepage
Martin Lepage Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Vsevolod Katritch
Vsevolod Katritch University of Southern California
Hans-Jürgen Kreienkamp
Hans-Jürgen Kreienkamp Universität Hamburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re fascinated by Neuroscience, there are several related online degrees and career paths to consider. For those interested in the intersection of Neuroscience and social work, pursuing a Master of Social Work can be a great option. Some of the cheapest msw programs online make advanced education accessible while helping you develop skills for a variety of people-centered roles.

Behavioral science is another growing area. Completing bcba coursework online can lead to careers in behavior analysis—key for working with individuals with developmental or behavioral disorders.

If you want to fast-track your education, you can look into accelerated masters in social work programs, which enable you to complete your degree in less time than traditional routes. Similarly, an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology is ideal for those wanting to begin a career quickly in psychology or related fields.

Exploring these online degrees expands your options and gives you flexibility to pursue diverse, in-demand careers connected to Neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Philippe Sarret

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles